2-0 TS I still believe no matter what happens
Misc updates
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAS
|
2
|
2 (2)
|
2 (1)
|
4 (2)
|
11 (8)
|
TS
|
0
|
4 (0)
|
2 (1)
|
5 (2)
|
8 (3)
|
(BANK)
OAS
TS
(BANK)
|
1
0.3k
0.4k
|
2
3.5k
$$
8.7k
|
3
12.3k
$$
$$$
0.4k
|
4
1.4k
$$$
$$$
5.9k
|
5
7.5k
$
$$$
8.2k
|
6
5.0k
$$$
$
10.2k
|
7
16.3k
$$$
$$$
2.2k
|
8
16.6k
$$$
$
11.2k
|
9
6.1k
$$$
$$$
9.3k
|
10
6.1k
$$$
$$
8.8k
|
11
10.7k
$$$
$$$
1.1k
|
12
13.0k
$$$
$$
1.0k
|
(BANK)
OAS
TS
(BANK)
|
13
0.2k
0.6k
|
14
1.4k
$$
8.3k
|
15
13.3k
$$
$$
0.6k
|
16
3.0k
$$$
$$
3.2k
|
17
8.1k
$
$$$
7.6k
|
18
2.4k
$$$
$$$
7.5k
|
19
8.6k
$$$
$$
0.3k
|
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAS
|
0
|
3 (0)
|
3 (0)
|
2 (0)
|
5 (0)
|
TS
|
2
|
2 (2)
|
0 (0)
|
2 (2)
|
9 (9)
|
(BANK)
OAS
TS
(BANK)
|
1
0.4k
0.1k
|
2
9.5k
$$
2.5k
|
3
0.3k
$$$
$$
8.9k
|
4
8.7k
$
$$$
13.9k
|
5
1.6k
$$$
$$$
16.9k
|
6
8.1k
$
$$$
17.2k
|
7
2.3k
$$$
$$$
24.4k
|
8
7.7k
$$
$$$
19.5k
|
9
0.7k
$$$
$$$
31.3k
|
10
8.4k
$
$$$
30.1k
|
11
0.9k
$$$
$$$
36.4k
|
12
0.7k
$$
$$$
18.7k
|
(BANK)
OAS
TS
(BANK)
|
13
0.2k
0.1k
|
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAS
|
2
|
5 (2)
|
5 (1)
|
6 (2)
|
16 (8)
|
TS
|
2
|
6 (2)
|
2 (1)
|
7 (4)
|
17 (12)
|
13-0-------13-013-0----------------------------------13-013-013-0
13-0-------13-013-0----------------------------------13-013-013-0
13-0-----13-0------13-0---------------------------- 13-0---------13-0
13-0------------------13-0----------------------------13-0------------13-0
13-0-----------13-0-13-0------13-013-0------13-0-------------13-0
13-0-------------------13-0------13-013-0------13-0-------------13-0
13-0-------------------13-0---------------------------13-0-----------13-0
13-0-----13-0-------13-0----------------------------13-0---------13-0
13-0---------13-013-0--------------------------------13-013-013-0
It'll be counted by map wins first, not rounds I believe. By no means TS profited fully from this. They're still in last place. Rounds or not, they still need to win their last match against Bren and APH if they want to go to the playoffs. By far, they're not out of the gutter.
Edit: It's still counted as a 13-0, but it's still map wins first, not round differentials.
Hypothetically, if it were a 4-way tie, it would be in the strategic interest of the 1st, 2nd or 3rd team to forfeit against the 4th team(which happens to be one of the better teams), as it would give less chances for the 4th team to increase their round differential and therefore topple the top 3 by that avenue, because as it seems currently, no map score is awarded or taken. If OAS ties with TS, the best play for OAS may be to forfeit, if they indeed do not lose rounds by doing so, ensuring a max 13 round differential on the Split.
Not at all accusing of OAS of doing that here, the scenarios are highly unlikely, but plausible, so I don't see a reason for them to orchestrate metagaming on this level, but it's something to be aware of. That's why I think map score should be both subtracted from the forfeiter and added to their adversary to not incentivize such metagaming, in general.
Edit: Scratch the first part, both scenarios are possible. If APH loses both of their games, TS wins both of their games and BRN vs OAS goes to BRN, which would be the 4 way tie scenario.. And if APH wins OAS, BRN wins TS, TS wins APH, BRN wins OG, it's a 2 way tie with OAS and TS. I still don't think it's reasonable to imply, that OAS intentionally forfeited, it's too big of a stretch, but it could be a valid tactical move in some of the scenarios.
Edit2: Useless comment, VLR baited me into assuming, that a point/series win system was the only relevant system.