this is gonna be close, i got SEN 2-1 though
Minor updates to observing
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
283 129 | 20 12 8 | / 12 4 8 / | 5 3 2 | +8 +8 0 | 173 74 | 19% 21% 15% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
243 162 | 20 10 10 | / 14 7 7 / | 4 3 1 | +6 +3 +3 | 123 67 | 19% 24% 16% | 5 3 2 | 5 2 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |||
|
205 144 | 15 5 10 | / 12 6 6 / | 9 3 6 | +3 -1 +4 | 129 90 | 13% 4% 20% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
170 119 | 11 3 8 | / 16 10 6 / | 6 3 3 | -5 -7 +2 | 114 73 | 11% 22% 5% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 | |||
|
145 92 | 11 5 6 | / 15 6 9 / | 6 2 4 | -4 -1 -3 | 98 68 | 20% 7% 28% | 3 1 2 | 1 2 -1 | +2 -1 +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
383 175 | 26 14 12 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 2 2 | +10 +5 +5 | 221 87 | 27% 26% 29% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |||
|
249 102 | 19 11 8 | / 16 9 7 / | 5 2 3 | +3 +2 +1 | 137 45 | 30% 38% 23% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
199 105 | 14 6 8 | / 17 10 7 / | 6 4 2 | -3 -4 +1 | 132 68 | 30% 22% 40% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
109 45 | 5 3 2 | / 14 7 7 / | 6 2 4 | -9 -4 -5 | 77 31 | 0% 0% 0% | 3 1 2 | 6 1 5 | -3 0 -3 | |||
|
70 35 | 4 2 2 | / 14 7 7 / | 5 3 2 | -10 -5 -5 | 56 27 | 15% 8% 29% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
288 132 | 39 22 17 | / 24 14 10 / | 9 6 3 | +15 +8 +7 | 172 76 | 19% 17% 22% | 4 1 3 | 3 1 2 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
219 133 | 32 16 16 | / 22 14 8 / | 9 4 5 | +10 +2 +8 | 115 55 | 21% 30% 14% | 8 5 3 | 9 3 6 | -1 +2 -3 | |||
|
210 123 | 29 11 18 | / 26 19 7 / | 10 5 5 | +3 -8 +11 | 122 71 | 16% 19% 14% | 3 1 2 | 4 3 1 | -1 -2 +1 | |||
|
191 96 | 26 13 13 | / 22 14 8 / | 13 7 6 | +4 -1 +5 | 126 60 | 19% 13% 26% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
183 60 | 24 17 7 | / 25 13 12 / | 12 6 6 | -1 +4 -5 | 115 41 | 16% 12% 23% | 5 3 2 | 1 2 -1 | +4 +1 +3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
281 165 | 35 17 18 | / 32 15 17 / | 6 2 4 | +3 +2 +1 | 171 90 | 22% 23% 21% | 5 2 3 | 4 1 3 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
215 122 | 30 13 17 | / 31 15 16 / | 6 2 4 | -1 -2 +1 | 134 72 | 29% 34% 26% | 2 2 0 | 1 2 -1 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
205 160 | 23 5 18 | / 26 12 14 / | 14 4 10 | -3 -7 +4 | 113 85 | 8% 0% 11% | 5 1 4 | 8 3 5 | -3 -2 -1 | |||
|
200 135 | 25 8 17 | / 33 16 17 / | 9 4 5 | -8 -8 0 | 137 94 | 24% 19% 27% | 6 2 4 | 6 3 3 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
51 31 | 5 2 3 | / 28 13 15 / | 10 5 5 | -23 -11 -12 | 36 18 | 12% 6% 20% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
293 135 | 19 10 9 | / 12 10 2 / | 4 3 1 | +7 0 +7 | 172 79 | 20% 13% 33% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |||
|
250 128 | 18 8 10 | / 10 9 1 / | 4 2 2 | +8 -1 +9 | 131 69 | 23% 17% 30% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
220 23 | 13 12 1 | / 10 7 3 / | 6 4 2 | +3 +5 -2 | 135 9 | 13% 14% 0% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |||
|
195 98 | 12 6 6 | / 8 7 1 / | 5 1 4 | +4 -1 +5 | 107 41 | 24% 35% 11% | 3 2 1 | 4 1 3 | -1 +1 -2 | |||
|
177 40 | 11 8 3 | / 10 8 2 / | 4 4 0 | +1 0 +1 | 124 26 | 27% 20% 67% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
301 295 | 18 2 16 | / 12 5 7 / | 8 2 6 | +6 -3 +9 | 156 150 | 13% 0% 14% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |||
|
200 169 | 11 2 9 | / 16 6 10 / | 3 0 3 | -5 -4 -1 | 143 124 | 18% 13% 19% | 3 1 2 | 4 2 2 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
180 145 | 11 2 9 | / 15 6 9 / | 1 0 1 | -4 -4 0 | 131 104 | 28% 25% 29% | 0 0 0 | 1 2 -1 | -1 -2 +1 | |||
|
178 153 | 9 3 6 | / 16 6 10 / | 2 0 2 | -7 -3 -4 | 113 93 | 14% 11% 15% | 2 0 2 | 3 0 3 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
31 26 | 1 0 1 | / 14 6 8 / | 5 2 3 | -13 -6 -7 | 12 8 | 0% 0% 0% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 |
Sentinels have been trolling a lot of their games so it's a little hard to rate them. However assuming it's still the same Sentinels that we've been used to, they should roll over Faze.
Faze has shown some good play. They looked pretty good at the beginning of their TSM games. However as soon as TSM made an adaptation they rolled over Faze. I expect the same to happen here.
Wealth_and_Taste [#2]Sentinels have been trolling a lot of their games so it's a little hard to rate them. However assuming it's still the same Sentinels that we've been used to, they should roll over Faze.
Faze has shown some good play. They looked pretty good at the beginning of their TSM games. However as soon as TSM made an adaptation they rolled over Faze. I expect the same to happen here.
The only games they have trolled were seeding matches tbf. I think the main question for their performance will be if shahzam will be able to perform as well as he usually can considering his dad just passed and as a result they haven't practiced as a team for a while. Either way should be a good match as faze are in good form so far.
NimbuS [#10]I wouldnt be too sure, Tailored said they havent practiced recently due to the passing of Shaz's father. FaZe could pull an upset, 2-1 FaZe
See that’s the thing, sentinels don’t scrim a lot compared to other teams. Regardless of Shazam’s situation, they haven’t prepared for so long to have a first round exit against FaZe. No chance for FaZe 2-1 lmfao
arnav [#13]See that’s the thing, sentinels don’t scrim a lot compared to other teams. Regardless of Shazam’s situation, they haven’t prepared for so long to have a first round exit against FaZe. No chance for FaZe 2-1 lmfao
you also said "its gonna be close 2-1" earlier lmfao make up your mind
xdee1234 [#14]you also said "its gonna be close 2-1" earlier lmfao make up your mind
My guy said 2-1 for faze, which I said there’s no chance for. You must have seen previous sentinels games such as vs T1. They might drop a super close OT map, but that’s about it. Nice try!
arnav [#15]My guy said 2-1 for faze, which I said there’s no chance for. You must have seen previous sentinels games such as vs T1. They might drop a super close OT map, but that’s about it. Nice try!
so faze wins a map but they have no chance. gotcha
hekzy [#22]holy fuck this is just radiant matchmaking
No executes, no refrags/trades, no comms. Sen is the best in NA? Then NA is lost.
How are you thinking about this website so far ?
NimbuS [#10]I wouldnt be too sure, Tailored said they havent practiced recently due to the passing of Shaz's father. FaZe could pull an upset, 2-1 FaZe
lol 2-1 faze he said
Philosopher_Stone [#24]How are you thinking about this website so far ?
It's nice, like a second HLTV. Although I'd prefer if there was more off topic threads and banter.
I think I remember your name, have I seen you somewhere?
xdee1234 [#26]lol 2-1 sentinels close game you said
that's what i wanted bruh, would have been so entertaining. i expected this, faze are not experienced at all. you just wanna mald so hard huh?
arnav [#28]that's what i wanted bruh, would have been so entertaining. i expected this, faze are not experienced at all. you just wanna mald so hard huh?
lmfao you said 2-1 expected 2-0 MAKE UP YOUR Mind lmFAO
hekzy [#22]holy fuck this is just radiant matchmaking
No executes, no refrags/trades, no comms. Sen is the best in NA? Then NA is lost.
I'm sorry but this is a stupid take. I've watched most of the NA and EU matches and there is no comparison, the quality of teams in NA in every aspect is superior on average. With that said, G2 is the best team for me.
hekzy [#27]It's nice, like a second HLTV. Although I'd prefer if there was more off topic threads and banter.
I think I remember your name, have I seen you somewhere?
I used a lot of “the spike.gg” but idk, starting to like this website more.
Philosopher_Stone [#31]I used a lot of “the spike.gg” but idk, starting to like this website more.
Right! Yeah, me too. But it seems like that website doesn't have a lot of traction.
sport2793 [#30]I'm sorry but this is a stupid take. I've watched most of the NA and EU matches and there is no comparison, the quality of teams in NA in every aspect is superior on average. With that said, G2 is the best team for me.
Yeah, no. I have yet to see an execute from NA. Seems like no matter how much money gets pumped in NA will always be pugteams and content creators. Just because you have more orgs rushing to buy teams in NA doesn't mean it's not an overinflated cesspool of garbage teams.
SUMN FC showed to be a better team than any NA team I've seen. So have heretics.
hekzy [#33]Yeah, no. I have yet to see an execute from NA. Seems like no matter how much money gets pumped in NA will always be pugteams and content creators. Just because you have more orgs rushing to buy teams in NA doesn't mean it's not an overinflated cesspool of garbage teams.
SUMN FC showed to be a better team than any NA team I've seen. So have heretics.
So basically you haven't watched NA's first strike main event
hekzy [#22]holy fuck this is just radiant matchmaking
No executes, no refrags/trades, no comms. Sen is the best in NA? Then NA is lost.
i think if you like executes then probably t1 from na is up your alley. they run a lot of executes but their attack side is really lacking due to their passiveness as a team (and also because they're easy to read)
Fat_Lard [#34]So basically you haven't watched NA's first strike main event
Literally watched all of First Strike. Show me ONE execute that is above puglevel from any team other than T1.
hekzy [#36]Literally watched all of First Strike. Show me ONE execute that is above puglevel from any team other than T1.
You're a clown, Heretics won today without any real tactical nous, largely due to "pug" qualities i.e. players clutching. You clearly have an agenda. Any good team at this level needs to be able to adjust on the fly and go away from preset executes and other tactical plays. Sentinels is the best and most consistent at this between NA and EU.
jayy [#35]i think if you like executes then probably t1 from na is up your alley. they run a lot of executes but their attack side is really lacking due to their passiveness as a team (and also because they're easy to read)
T1 is the perfect example why you can't use "executes" as a measure of a team's ability. Any team can read T1 like a book if they stick to pre-programmed maneuvers, the VOD on all of the teams is plenty at this point. That's why T1 started off so hot and then got decimated against 100T. It's not rocket science.
sport2793 [#37]You're a clown, Heretics won today without any real tactical nous, largely due to "pug" qualities i.e. players clutching. You clearly have an agenda. Any good team at this level needs to be able to adjust on the fly and go away from preset executes and other tactical plays. Sentinels is the best and most consistent at this between NA and EU.
Heretics literally executed even on retakes. Are you out of your mind? I won't speak with silvers. If you can't understand what a difference between 2 smokes and 50 raw duels against literally cohesively throwing all your utility at the enemy to make him the least comfortable on his duels and win then no matter how much you watch of this game, you will never learn. Heretics were outstanding, especially on retakes. They put more thought and strategy towards their map control and simple territory pushes than what NA teams put on their entire gameplan.
Also, there is no need to adjust when there is nothing to adjust to. Much like in matchmaking.
sport2793 [#38]T1 is the perfect example why you can't use "executes" as a measure of a team's ability. Any team can read T1 like a book if they stick to pre-programmed maneuvers, the VOD on all of the teams is plenty at this point. That's why T1 started off so hot and then got decimated against 100T. It's not rocket science.
Because T1 is very slow and has really passive players. There is a difference between raw aggression (NA teams), set pieces (T1) and proactive strategy.