These frauds would never win a round
Your arguments? You tell me it's different, sure, both require aim, but the other one, with the addition of new characters, seems more like a hero shooter with 300 abilities that carry your aim rather than a game that requires skill. I'll let you guess which game I'm talking about...
Did CS fans insult your mother or something to make you so mad? Otherwise, play Quake or Unreal. Sure, they're not the same type of game, but I think they require a lot more skill than Val or CS.
What I said was totally rage bait and I stand by it. Under no circumstances can CS players on Valo beat Val players on Val, and vice versa. The two are different, and both are suited to the style of game they play. After all, it's no coincidence that when Valorant was released, the majority of good players on the game were former CS players...
Plus, you're talking about two different styles of aim, but that doesn't mean one is better than the other. Both require skill. In CS, you need good tracking and accuracy to spray (a bit like in Apex, roughly speaking). In Val, you need accuracy if you want to one-tap, but in essence, the two are similar, so the braindead who say that CS has no aim are just people who have never played the game, that's all. But the spells in val clearly helps a little if "you don't have a good aim" (roughly speaking), when in CS, you are kinda fucked up. But if Riot starts adding totally broken characters, we'll end up with a hero shooter and not a tactical game.