2-0
13-10
13-9
Xeppaa
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
stax
VS
|
12
11
+1
|
7
11
-4
|
9
9
+0
|
13
4
+9
|
12
14
-2
|
Rb
VS
|
7
10
-3
|
7
15
-8
|
7
6
+1
|
8
6
+2
|
13
9
+4
|
BuZz
VS
|
8
11
-3
|
7
9
-2
|
17
10
+7
|
10
7
+3
|
12
18
-6
|
k1Ng
VS
|
9
12
-3
|
11
9
+2
|
9
4
+5
|
7
8
-1
|
7
9
-2
|
MaKo
VS
|
13
11
+2
|
12
9
+3
|
6
3
+3
|
5
8
-3
|
6
14
-8
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
stax
VS
|
3
1
+2
|
1
1
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
4
-3
|
Rb
VS
|
1
2
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
BuZz
VS
|
3
2
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
7
3
+4
|
1
0
+1
|
3
7
-4
|
k1Ng
VS
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
0
2
-2
|
MaKo
VS
|
1
2
-1
|
0
2
-2
|
|
0
1
-1
|
2
4
-2
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
stax
VS
|
|
0
4
-4
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
Rb
VS
|
|
1
3
-2
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
BuZz
VS
|
|
1
2
-1
|
3
0
+3
|
2
0
+2
|
5
1
+4
|
k1Ng
VS
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
MaKo
VS
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
stax
VS
|
|
10
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
8
|
1
|
Rb
VS
|
|
7
|
4
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
40
|
3
|
2
|
k1Ng
VS
|
|
4
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
5
|
2
|
BuZz
VS
|
|
4
|
6
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
2
|
0
|
MaKo
VS
|
|
12
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
3
|
1
|
xeta
C9
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
10
|
2
|
mitch
C9
|
|
13
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
2
|
1
|
vanity
C9
|
|
6
|
1
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
2
|
2
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
|
7
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
2
|
1
|
leaf
C9
|
|
11
|
5
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
2
|
2
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
stax
VS
|
4
4
+0
|
2
1
+1
|
5
3
+2
|
7
2
+5
|
6
9
-3
|
Rb
VS
|
1
4
-3
|
3
6
-3
|
2
2
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
2
2
+0
|
BuZz
VS
|
3
4
-1
|
2
3
-1
|
4
4
+0
|
4
4
+0
|
4
5
-1
|
k1Ng
VS
|
3
4
-1
|
4
3
+1
|
1
2
-1
|
2
1
+1
|
3
5
-2
|
MaKo
VS
|
4
5
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
0
5
-5
|
1
5
-4
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
stax
VS
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
Rb
VS
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
BuZz
VS
|
0
2
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
4
1
+3
|
1
0
+1
|
0
4
-4
|
k1Ng
VS
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
MaKo
VS
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
0
2
-2
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
stax
VS
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
Rb
VS
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
BuZz
VS
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
k1Ng
VS
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
MaKo
VS
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
stax
VS
|
|
1
Round 22
mitch
vanity
|
2
Round 20
leaf
vanity
xeta
Round 23
xeta
leaf
Xeppaa
|
1
Round 14
leaf
xeta
mitch
vanity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
1
|
0
|
Rb
VS
|
|
|
1
Round 19
xeta
leaf
mitch
|
|
|
|
|
1
Round 19
xeta
mitch
leaf
|
|
|
31
|
2
|
1
|
k1Ng
VS
|
|
1
Round 18
mitch
vanity
|
1
Round 22
Xeppaa
xeta
leaf
|
|
|
2
Round 13
leaf
Round 15
Xeppaa
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
0
|
1
|
BuZz
VS
|
|
1
Round 21
xeta
leaf
|
2
Round 15
xeta
leaf
mitch
Round 17
vanity
Xeppaa
xeta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
1
|
0
|
MaKo
VS
|
|
4
Round 9
mitch
Xeppaa
Round 13
mitch
Xeppaa
Round 16
Xeppaa
vanity
Round 21
vanity
Xeppaa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
0
|
0
|
xeta
C9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
2
|
0
|
mitch
C9
|
|
4
Round 1
Rb
k1Ng
Round 5
MaKo
k1Ng
Round 6
MaKo
Rb
Round 10
Rb
stax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
1
|
1
|
vanity
C9
|
|
3
Round 4
Rb
stax
Round 10
k1Ng
MaKo
Round 23
Rb
stax
|
|
|
|
1
Round 23
stax
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
0
|
0
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
|
4
Round 2
stax
MaKo
Round 7
MaKo
Rb
Round 12
k1Ng
Rb
Round 18
Rb
k1Ng
|
2
Round 8
BuZz
stax
MaKo
Round 11
k1Ng
Rb
MaKo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
1
|
1
|
leaf
C9
|
|
5
Round 4
BuZz
k1Ng
Round 7
stax
k1Ng
Round 12
stax
MaKo
Round 13
Rb
stax
Round 15
MaKo
stax
|
2
Round 3
BuZz
MaKo
Rb
Round 19
MaKo
stax
BuZz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
0
|
1
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
stax
VS
|
4
2
+2
|
3
4
-1
|
2
3
-1
|
2
1
+1
|
3
1
+2
|
Rb
VS
|
3
2
+1
|
1
5
-4
|
3
2
+1
|
4
2
+2
|
7
3
+4
|
BuZz
VS
|
4
2
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
7
3
+4
|
4
1
+3
|
5
8
-3
|
k1Ng
VS
|
2
4
-2
|
4
2
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
1
3
-2
|
1
2
-1
|
MaKo
VS
|
6
4
+2
|
6
1
+5
|
1
1
+0
|
3
1
+2
|
1
3
-2
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
stax
VS
|
3
0
+3
|
|
|
|
|
Rb
VS
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
1
1
+0
|
BuZz
VS
|
3
0
+3
|
|
3
1
+2
|
|
1
2
-1
|
k1Ng
VS
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
MaKo
VS
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
|
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
stax
VS
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
|
Rb
VS
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
|
BuZz
VS
|
|
|
|
|
|
k1Ng
VS
|
|
|
|
|
|
MaKo
VS
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
stax
VS
|
|
4
Round 10
Xeppaa
mitch
Round 11
Xeppaa
mitch
Round 13
Xeppaa
leaf
Round 22
Xeppaa
leaf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
2
|
0
|
Rb
VS
|
|
4
Round 5
leaf
Xeppaa
Round 14
mitch
xeta
Round 17
leaf
xeta
Round 18
Xeppaa
leaf
|
2
Round 12
leaf
vanity
xeta
Round 15
vanity
leaf
xeta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
1
|
0
|
k1Ng
VS
|
|
1
Round 18
xeta
mitch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
4
|
0
|
BuZz
VS
|
|
1
Round 11
leaf
xeta
|
4
Round 3
vanity
leaf
mitch
Round 6
Xeppaa
vanity
xeta
Round 7
Xeppaa
leaf
xeta
Round 20
vanity
Xeppaa
xeta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
1
|
0
|
MaKo
VS
|
|
5
Round 13
xeta
mitch
Round 15
mitch
Xeppaa
Round 16
mitch
Xeppaa
Round 17
Xeppaa
mitch
Round 22
xeta
mitch
|
1
Round 9
leaf
Xeppaa
xeta
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
0
|
1
|
xeta
C9
|
|
3
Round 4
Rb
k1Ng
Round 10
k1Ng
BuZz
Round 13
stax
Rb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
1
|
2
|
mitch
C9
|
|
2
Round 10
MaKo
Rb
Round 19
Rb
stax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
1
|
0
|
vanity
C9
|
|
|
1
Round 9
BuZz
MaKo
k1Ng
|
|
|
1
Round 9
k1Ng
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
1
|
1
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
|
|
1
Round 1
MaKo
stax
BuZz
|
|
1
Round 2
k1Ng
BuZz
MaKo
stax
Rb
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
0
|
0
|
leaf
C9
|
|
3
Round 4
BuZz
MaKo
Round 8
BuZz
Rb
Round 17
BuZz
MaKo
|
2
Round 16
BuZz
MaKo
stax
Round 20
Rb
k1Ng
BuZz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
0
|
0
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
stax
VS
|
4
5
-1
|
2
6
-4
|
2
3
-1
|
4
1
+3
|
3
4
-1
|
Rb
VS
|
3
4
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
2
2
+0
|
3
2
+1
|
4
4
+0
|
BuZz
VS
|
1
5
-4
|
3
6
-3
|
6
3
+3
|
2
2
+0
|
3
5
-2
|
k1Ng
VS
|
4
4
+0
|
3
4
-1
|
5
1
+4
|
4
4
+0
|
3
2
+1
|
MaKo
VS
|
3
2
+1
|
3
6
-3
|
3
1
+2
|
2
2
+0
|
4
6
-2
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
stax
VS
|
|
1
1
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
2
-1
|
Rb
VS
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
BuZz
VS
|
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
2
1
+1
|
k1Ng
VS
|
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
0
1
-1
|
MaKo
VS
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
2
2
+0
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
mitch
C9
|
vanity
C9
|
xeta
C9
|
leaf
C9
|
|
stax
VS
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
Rb
VS
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
BuZz
VS
|
|
0
2
-2
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
3
0
+3
|
k1Ng
VS
|
|
|
|
|
|
MaKo
VS
|
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
stax
VS
|
|
5
Round 1
Xeppaa
xeta
Round 2
leaf
xeta
Round 12
Xeppaa
xeta
Round 14
Xeppaa
vanity
Round 22
mitch
leaf
|
1
Round 16
mitch
xeta
Xeppaa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
5
|
1
|
Rb
VS
|
|
3
Round 17
mitch
leaf
Round 21
vanity
Xeppaa
Round 22
Xeppaa
xeta
|
1
Round 8
Xeppaa
mitch
xeta
|
|
|
1
Round 13
mitch
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
0
|
1
|
k1Ng
VS
|
|
2
Round 14
leaf
xeta
Round 23
mitch
vanity
|
2
Round 9
mitch
Xeppaa
xeta
Round 18
xeta
vanity
Xeppaa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
1
|
1
|
BuZz
VS
|
|
2
Round 6
leaf
vanity
Round 21
xeta
mitch
|
|
1
Round 19
leaf
vanity
xeta
mitch
|
|
1
Round 19
mitch
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
0
|
0
|
MaKo
VS
|
|
3
Round 13
xeta
Xeppaa
Round 23
Xeppaa
leaf
Round 24
mitch
vanity
|
1
Round 10
mitch
xeta
vanity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
3
|
0
|
xeta
C9
|
|
2
Round 17
k1Ng
Rb
Round 22
k1Ng
stax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
7
|
0
|
mitch
C9
|
|
7
Round 3
MaKo
stax
Round 10
stax
Rb
Round 13
MaKo
Rb
mitch
Round 15
MaKo
k1Ng
Round 17
stax
MaKo
Round 19
stax
MaKo
Round 24
stax
BuZz
|
1
Round 1
Rb
MaKo
BuZz
|
|
|
1
Round 12
k1Ng
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
0
|
0
|
vanity
C9
|
|
3
Round 3
Rb
BuZz
Round 8
stax
MaKo
Round 20
k1Ng
BuZz
|
|
|
|
1
Round 16
stax
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
1
|
1
|
Xeppaa
C9
|
|
3
Round 13
stax
k1Ng
Round 16
MaKo
k1Ng
Round 19
Rb
k1Ng
|
2
Round 2
Rb
BuZz
stax
Round 7
MaKo
BuZz
stax
|
1
Round 6
stax
BuZz
Rb
k1Ng
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
1
|
0
|
leaf
C9
|
|
3
Round 5
stax
MaKo
Round 15
stax
BuZz
Round 24
Rb
MaKo
|
1
Round 20
MaKo
Rb
stax
|
1
Round 12
MaKo
Rb
BuZz
stax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
2
|
1
|
CongoBat [#3]why do you never say the teams
because without the teams I already have less than a 0.02% chance of getting it right (yes i've done the math). If i included teams that'd be more like 1 in a million
crazy_igel_fan [#11]Long awaited FNC C9 rematch will be here
Orrrr fnatic can decide they can hit shots again, wtf wp fnc
s1mple_valorant_killer69 [#41]vision striker remember just dont bring lakia and bench him it will be easy win if not it will be like fnatic where u lose okay
Hard to admit but true lmao, the team composition is already perfect even without lakia
baik1216 [#52]VS 2:1 C9
VS ban fracture, C9 ban breeze
VS pick heaven, will win 13:8
C9 pick bind, will win 13:11
VS ban ascent, C9 ban bind
split remains
VS win 13:10
Ehhh bind I think will still go to c9 but score a little closer maybe 30-28
baik1216 [#52]VS 2:1 C9
VS ban fracture, C9 ban breeze
VS pick heaven, will win 13:8
C9 pick bind, will win 13:11
VS ban ascent, C9 ban bind
split remains
VS win 13:10
c9 pick bind . c9 ban bind
random_predictions [#4]because without the teams I already have less than a 0.02% chance of getting it right (yes i've done the math). If i included teams that'd be more like 1 in a million
BIG BRAIN DUDE
random_predictions [#4]because without the teams I already have less than a 0.02% chance of getting it right (yes i've done the math). If i included teams that'd be more like 1 in a million
Fucking Chad
random_predictions [#4]because without the teams I already have less than a 0.02% chance of getting it right (yes i've done the math). If i included teams that'd be more like 1 in a million
Not wrong for the first game💀💀
random_predictions [#4]because without the teams I already have less than a 0.02% chance of getting it right (yes i've done the math). If i included teams that'd be more like 1 in a million
are you one of those 2 chads who got pickems correct for every champs game til now
Heavon [#104]That k1ng KJ ult last round took 50004 years to be used for some fcking reason? WHY?
Kay/o knife.
random_predictions [#4]because without the teams I already have less than a 0.02% chance of getting it right (yes i've done the math). If i included teams that'd be more like 1 in a million
What if they get to overtime?
random_predictions [#4]because without the teams I already have less than a 0.02% chance of getting it right (yes i've done the math). If i included teams that'd be more like 1 in a million
.
Coopertin0 [#115]Ranbeer "Rb" Basher is an Indian electronic sports player who plays for VS( Visakhapatnam Soldiers ), a team in Andhra Pradesh, India. He is well known for his Ramen Noodle shop in Mumbai and his unmatched fast-food chain KFC(Korean fried chicken).
lol
random_predictions [#4]because without the teams I already have less than a 0.02% chance of getting it right (yes i've done the math). If i included teams that'd be more like 1 in a million
It wasn't a 2-0 but sheesh u got the scores spot on
Coopertin0 [#115]Ranbeer "Rb" Basher is an Indian electronic sports player who plays for VS( Visakhapatnam Soldiers ), a team in Andhra Pradesh, India. He is well known for his Ramen Noodle shop in Mumbai and his unmatched fast-food chain KFC(Korean fried chicken).
Korean Fried Chicken lmfao
random_predictions [#4]because without the teams I already have less than a 0.02% chance of getting it right (yes i've done the math). If i included teams that'd be more like 1 in a million
If u say t'he teams it Will be only a half of probability inside of t'he probability u hace now 0.02% - > 0.01% because in of t'he probability u get t'he right scores u only have two more options: team 1 win or team 2 win. So u have less t'han 1 in 10000 to getting right with telling t'he teams
Kepin [#84]sentinels got eliminated, made others NA team rising. nice. after c9 win this 2-0, we will see envy 2-0 patiphan+4. 13-0 13-0
ga begitu konsepnya kepin
Narot [#145]VS icebox was not that bad they should not have banned. it might cost them badly.
vs should play icebox.breeze is a aim map.
random_predictions [#1]2-0
13-10
13-9
13-10....13-9...good gusse.. Unfortunately(fortunate for me) it's 1-1 😅🙌
raka_gg [#154]VS is so fucking bad lmao, just uninstall at this point
Aaah yes, classic raka 1head take
raka_gg [#154]VS is so fucking bad lmao, just uninstall at this point
Aaah yes, classic raka 1head take my day wouldn't be the same without it
onmyodo [#157]Leaf and Xeppa played pretty nice today. Congrats to them. Vanity is still a shit and the loudest one among them. Cant get warm to this guy since M1
mitch too lol, never seen him frag that much with his role.
onmyodo [#157]Leaf and Xeppa played pretty nice today. Congrats to them. Vanity is still a shit and the loudest one among them. Cant get warm to this guy since M1
just bc vanity doesnt get kills doesnt mean hes shit, in fact he is the most important player in c9
Thund4h [#156]VS just gave liquid an easy semifinal spot
C9 is washing lulquid, lulquid almost lost to SEN worst team
pewpew [#160]mitch too lol, never seen him frag that much with his role.
Mitch's oping was really good
onmyodo [#157]Leaf and Xeppa played pretty nice today. Congrats to them. Vanity is still a shit and the loudest one among them. Cant get warm to this guy since M1
cloud9 was shit before vanity bro
AyeSuMwanKEvin [#59]i think c9 will win. xeppa n leaf r overpower
2:1
9:13 VS
13:10 C9
13:8 C9
where korea. fan. Vs.have they win?
xaboff [#159]Aaah yes, classic raka 1head take my day wouldn't be the same without it
more like 0head
SenWinChampions [#24]C9 2-1
I have been saying long time (before start of Champions) that VS is overrated
you heard it here first.
AS I SAID.
Gud [#168]VS need more explosive duelist, buzz is good but sometimes not really impactful
Maybe buzz out seoldam in, i dunno
Sounds pretty good
Gud [#168]VS need more explosive duelist, buzz is good but sometimes not really impactful
Maybe buzz out seoldam in, i dunno
surely you’re trolling
Kepin [#84]sentinels got eliminated, made others NA team rising. nice. after c9 win this 2-0, we will see envy 2-0 patiphan+4. 13-0 13-0
Tolol kali, ini aja 2-1, sekarang bukan eranya NA lagi mas, mereka dapet 13-0 mustahil
Donotgood [#175]Going to Playoffs nice doesnt matter cause any EU Team is about to crush C9
Aggre, TL gonna smash them