SRG ban Fracture; FUN ban Split; SRG pick Lotus; FUN pick Haven; SRG pick Icebox; FUN pick Pearl; Ascent remains
Betting
Anonymous Betting & Instant Crypto Withdrawals
Ended
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Maps/Stats
All Maps
1 Lotus
2 Haven
3 Icebox
4 Pearl
5 Ascent
Pistol Won Eco (won) $ (won) $$ (won) $$$ (won)
SRG
0
4 (0)
0 (0)
4 (3)
15 (7)
FUN
2
2 (2)
1 (0)
5 (3)
15 (8)
Eco: 0-5k $ Semi-eco: 5-10k $$ Semi-buy: 10-20k $$$ Full buy: 20k+
(BANK)
SRG
FUN
(BANK)
1
0.4k
0.2k
2
8.9k
$$
3.5k
3
1.0k
$$$
$$$
13.2k
4
8.4k
$$$
$$$
2.9k
5
6.8k
$$$
$$
7.7k
6
8.7k
$$$
$$$
2.2k
7
9.7k
$$
$$$
15.1k
8
14.2k
$$$
$$$
5.0k
9
5.8k
$$$
$$$
5.6k
10
8.8k
$$
$$$
10.7k
11
3.2k
$$$
$$$
22.9k
12
0.4k
$$
$$$
26.4k
(BANK)
SRG
FUN
(BANK)
13
0.2k
0.2k
14
8.3k
$$
1.8k
15
0.8k
$$$
$$
12.6k
16
7.7k
$$
$$$
18.8k
17
12.4k
$$$
$$$
6.5k
18
17.6k
$$$
$$
7.8k
19
27.0k
$$$
$$$
1.4k
20
14.2k
$$$
$$$
4.9k
21
5.0k
$$$
$$$
5.5k
22
14.1k
$$$
$
7.9k
23
15.8k
$$$
$$$
1.4k
Pistol Won Eco (won) $ (won) $$ (won) $$$ (won)
SRG
1
3 (1)
3 (0)
3 (2)
17 (11)
FUN
1
3 (1)
4 (2)
2 (1)
17 (8)
Eco: 0-5k $ Semi-eco: 5-10k $$ Semi-buy: 10-20k $$$ Full buy: 20k+
(BANK)
SRG
FUN
(BANK)
1
0.2k
0.5k
2
5.1k
$$
8.6k
3
12.7k
$$$
$$$
0.4k
4
3.5k
$$$
$
11.8k
5
6.9k
$
$$$
18.0k
6
2.0k
$$$
$$$
15.0k
7
3.7k
$$$
$$$
3.6k
8
7.7k
$$$
$
7.7k
9
12.9k
$$$
$$$
1.7k
10
15.3k
$$$
$$
0.5k
11
16.0k
$$$
$
7.8k
12
5.6k
$$$
$$$
6.6k
(BANK)
SRG
FUN
(BANK)
13
0.2k
0.3k
14
7.8k
$$
1.6k
15
0.6k
$$$
$
12.3k
16
5.6k
$$$
$$$
1.9k
17
1.4k
$$
$$$
16.0k
18
7.2k
$
$$$
29.5k
19
0.6k
$$$
$$$
36.1k
20
5.4k
$$$
$$$
21.4k
21
10.2k
$
$$$
20.3k
22
1.5k
$$$
$$$
24.4k
23
4.0k
$$$
$$$
12.2k
24
0.8k
$$
$$$
18.9k
(BANK)
SRG
FUN
(BANK)
25
1.7k
$$$
$$$
1.2k
26
1.4k
$$$
$$$
1.5k
Pistol Won Eco (won) $ (won) $$ (won) $$$ (won)
SRG
1
3 (1)
1 (0)
7 (2)
8 (3)
FUN
1
3 (1)
0 (0)
5 (3)
11 (9)
Eco: 0-5k $ Semi-eco: 5-10k $$ Semi-buy: 10-20k $$$ Full buy: 20k+
(BANK)
SRG
FUN
(BANK)
1
0.2k
0.4k
2
8.6k
$$
4.5k
3
0.4k
$$$
$$$
12.9k
4
9.1k
$
$$$
12.7k
5
1.6k
$$$
$$$
19.2k
6
7.1k
$$
$$$
27.3k
7
1.7k
$$$
$$$
28.7k
8
3.6k
$$
$$$
32.4k
9
0.9k
$$
$$$
26.7k
10
5.6k
$$
$$$
33.5k
11
3.4k
$$
$$$
32.4k
12
1.4k
$$
$$$
32.8k
(BANK)
SRG
FUN
(BANK)
13
0.4k
0.1k
14
3.0k
$$
7.6k
15
13.8k
$$$
$$
0.6k
16
2.9k
$$$
$$$
6.9k
17
5.9k
$$$
$$
7.2k
18
15.0k
$$$
$$
3.1k
19
15.0k
$$$
$$
7.6k
Pistol Won Eco (won) $ (won) $$ (won) $$$ (won)
SRG
0
3 (0)
2 (1)
5 (1)
5 (0)
FUN
2
2 (2)
0 (0)
4 (4)
9 (7)
Eco: 0-5k $ Semi-eco: 5-10k $$ Semi-buy: 10-20k $$$ Full buy: 20k+
(BANK)
SRG
FUN
(BANK)
1
0.2k
0.2k
2
7.9k
$$
3.7k
3
0.9k
$$$
$$
14.8k
4
6.7k
$
$$$
18.4k
5
11.3k
$$$
$$$
6.0k
6
8.2k
$$
$$$
16.9k
7
0.6k
$$$
$$$
26.4k
8
6.9k
$$
$$$
20.9k
9
1.2k
$$$
$$$
28.6k
10
6.5k
$$
$$$
30.8k
11
1.0k
$$$
$$$
32.3k
12
0.8k
$$
$$$
29.0k
(BANK)
SRG
FUN
(BANK)
13
0.1k
0.5k
14
0.6k
$
$$
1.5k
15
0.9k
$$
$$
13.4k
Stats from this map are not available yet
Pistol Won Eco (won) $ (won) $$ (won) $$$ (won)
SRG
2
13 (2)
6 (1)
19 (8)
45 (21)
FUN
6
10 (6)
5 (2)
16 (11)
52 (32)
Eco: 0-5k $ Semi-eco: 5-10k $$ Semi-buy: 10-20k $$$ Full buy: 20k+
Head-to-head
Past Matches
Comments:
Hide Pre-match
Threaded Linear
#1
Kuuu
-2
Frags
+

uwu

#2
Ternal
0
Frags
+

what is non verbal

#3
Quack23456
0
Frags
+

Ig its a funhavers rebrand?

#7
EthanLock6
14
Frags
+

prior to funhavers. non-verbal was the name of a t3 free agent team. that team made stage 3 of challengers 2024 and were signed by funhavers where they rebranded.

since they didnt make it in CQ to 2025 split 1, they've had to go back to premier where they have been using the name of their original team, non-verbal. this is because it is not possible to change the name of a premier team and making a new team would mean the team couldn't play in invite right away.

vlr is using the name of their premier team since that is their official name but should they win this match and make split 2 they will go back to funhavers.

tl;dr: this is still funhavers and there hasnt been a rebrand

#4
raezuha
0
Frags
+

MEEEEOOOOOWWWWWWW

#5
bobwoblob
2
Frags
+

watch NV get gatekept by the same team again

#6
Epicfail909
-2
Frags
+

I think 2-1 SRG wins.

Edit: oh it was a BO5 3-2 SRG wins (it’s 1-1 currently)

#26
Epicfail909
-1
Frags
+

Damn

#8
fayewars
0
Frags
+

ah shit here we go again

#9
cinnastick
0
Frags
+

srg squeaks it out in OT map 3

#10
DBStudios
1
Frags
+

tim goes +30 redemption from last time

#11
Subwaywang
0
Frags
+

Round 6 map 1

#12
ggd12345
0
Frags
+

i did not know this was a best of 5, SRG losing their map pick tho...

#13
Ghostjinn
1
Frags
+

alexis has to lock in, she's not been great recently

#38
Tetrodotoxin
1
Frags
+

The vibes are not enough to carry a team to Challengers and I hope they consider more initiator players in the scene as I have rarely ever seen her frag when it truly mattered

#14
localkoolkid
1
Frags
+

Stoppable Force vs Moveable Object

Battle for the privilege to go 0-4

#15
ggd12345
3
Frags
+

coughing baby vs hydrogen balloon

#16
Kaust
-3
Frags
+

Non Verbal? Didn't know Verno had a Challengers team :/

#17
XtraChrxs
4
Frags
+

another 13-0 incoming?

#18
XtraChrxs
11
Frags
+

wow sr fans will downvote anything i guess

#19
LouBag
0
Frags
+

at least they had fun...

#20
fictional
7
Frags
+

this SR team saving strat for GC finals

#21
cameran
-21
Frags
+

SRG losing isnt their fault, they had to show 5 weeks worth of maps/footage to funhavers, while also having a rematch, of course funhavers will figure out their mistakes
yall acting like SRG are bad when they arent, funhavers just had wayy more footage to anti strat

#22
bobwoblob
22
Frags
+

holy cope. Maybe the fully salaried team should know how to anti strat an unpaid premier team. Or maybe not be so ass that they're in relegation in the first place.

#23
cameran
-11
Frags
+

young talent is of course going to be better than SRG, your acting like its a huge deal of them losing when its literally just a team having more footage

also not sure why ur trying to mention NV being a unpaid team, most premiere teams are better than some paid teams

#24
bobwoblob
13
Frags
+

you're acting like having more footage is why SRG are losing when they lost to 4 separate challengers teams with equal footage. They just fucking suck

#25
cameran
-6
Frags
+

yeah and im talking about funhavers not the teams SRG played

#27
bobwoblob
6
Frags
+

funhavers are clearly way better than SRG so...

#29
shrike-
-6
Frags
+

i wouldn’t pay too much mind to him, bobwoblob actively prays on the downfall of any gc player/team in tier 2 or above

#31
ggd12345
6
Frags
+

praying on downfall = "they suck, i hope they lose". analysis = "they suck because they lost badly". hope this helps

#32
shrike-
0
Frags
+

that’s like precisely what he’s done for months lmao

#33
ggd12345
1
Frags
+

maybe, but not here

#34
shrike-
1
Frags
+

Fair

#28
bobwoblob
8
Frags
+

Paid a salary for this?

#30
kohta7
0
Frags
+

nvm

#35
Ronyko23
4
Frags
+

Thank you funhaver hahahahahah

#36
Ronyko23
5
Frags
+

Every tier 2 pug stack is farming GC champions lol.

#37
rStellar
-1
Frags
+

have more ego srg you dont even deserve tier 3

#39
Ryzeee
-1
Frags
+

huhh

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment