GenG 2-1 C9
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.14 1.18 1.11 | 179 169 189 | 16 8 8 | / 15 7 8 / | 7 5 2 | +1 +1 0 | 67% 67% 67% | 131 124 139 | 16% 16% 17% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.98 0.96 0.99 | 255 267 243 | 21 11 10 | / 21 11 10 / | 4 4 0 | 0 0 0 | 67% 67% 67% | 168 179 157 | 32% 24% 45% | 5 2 3 | 5 2 3 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.93 0.82 1.04 | 229 191 269 | 19 7 12 | / 20 8 12 / | 3 2 1 | -1 -1 0 | 63% 67% 58% | 130 120 140 | 24% 11% 37% | 7 5 2 | 2 2 0 | +5 +3 +2 | |
|
0.79 0.97 0.61 | 166 179 155 | 15 8 7 | / 18 8 10 / | 5 3 2 | -3 0 -3 | 58% 67% 50% | 105 100 109 | 28% 27% 29% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.65 0.85 0.44 | 135 166 104 | 8 6 2 | / 17 8 9 / | 10 6 4 | -9 -2 -7 | 67% 75% 58% | 106 123 90 | 13% 15% 11% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.22 1.53 0.90 | 197 212 183 | 16 9 7 | / 15 6 9 / | 10 8 2 | +1 +3 -2 | 67% 75% 58% | 139 159 118 | 21% 23% 19% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.19 1.13 1.25 | 187 185 189 | 16 8 8 | / 13 7 6 / | 7 3 4 | +3 +1 +2 | 75% 83% 67% | 135 122 147 | 35% 44% 29% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
1.19 1.15 1.22 | 247 238 256 | 21 11 10 | / 17 9 8 / | 7 5 2 | +4 +2 +2 | 79% 67% 92% | 169 167 170 | 29% 32% 26% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
1.12 0.80 1.44 | 255 208 303 | 20 8 12 | / 17 9 8 / | 7 3 4 | +3 -1 +4 | 83% 75% 92% | 163 146 180 | 26% 22% 30% | 5 1 4 | 0 0 0 | +5 +1 +4 | |
|
0.94 1.27 0.61 | 202 283 121 | 18 13 5 | / 17 8 9 / | 5 2 3 | +1 +5 -4 | 54% 58% 50% | 125 167 82 | 19% 19% 19% | 3 3 0 | 4 1 3 | -1 +2 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.84 1.27 1.05 | 232 207 257 | 59 25 34 | / 55 30 25 / | 11 8 3 | +4 -5 +9 | 65% 69% 61% | 152 141 162 | 29% 23% 36% | 13 7 6 | 14 7 7 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.35 0.76 1.05 | 222 256 191 | 55 33 22 | / 51 22 29 / | 22 9 13 | +4 +11 -7 | 69% 69% 69% | 145 160 130 | 20% 20% 21% | 7 4 3 | 8 3 5 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
1.14 0.91 1.02 | 168 188 148 | 42 24 18 | / 42 21 21 / | 20 15 5 | 0 +3 -3 | 70% 77% 64% | 119 127 111 | 20% 16% 25% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.87 1.11 0.99 | 211 195 227 | 54 24 30 | / 51 25 26 / | 11 6 5 | +3 -1 +4 | 75% 80% 69% | 137 132 141 | 28% 33% 24% | 9 5 4 | 8 6 2 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.91 0.65 0.78 | 160 174 146 | 37 21 16 | / 51 24 27 / | 25 14 11 | -14 -3 -11 | 75% 80% 69% | 115 117 114 | 18% 22% 15% | 2 0 2 | 7 2 5 | -5 -2 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.38 0.96 1.17 | 238 257 218 | 59 34 25 | / 51 23 28 / | 17 10 7 | +8 +11 -3 | 72% 72% 71% | 150 162 138 | 24% 22% 27% | 8 4 4 | 6 2 4 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
1.20 0.98 1.09 | 186 172 202 | 47 22 25 | / 48 22 26 / | 28 19 9 | -1 0 -1 | 70% 75% 66% | 130 127 134 | 21% 23% 19% | 4 2 2 | 4 2 2 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.03 1.05 1.04 | 183 183 184 | 43 22 21 | / 44 22 22 / | 21 9 12 | -1 0 -1 | 72% 69% 74% | 127 123 131 | 30% 40% 24% | 5 3 2 | 7 2 5 | -2 +1 -3 | |
|
0.85 1.13 0.99 | 222 199 248 | 53 24 29 | / 53 27 26 / | 21 10 11 | 0 -3 +3 | 80% 78% 83% | 141 123 160 | 23% 17% 30% | 13 6 7 | 5 4 1 | +8 +2 +6 | |
|
0.89 0.85 0.87 | 186 197 177 | 48 26 22 | / 51 26 25 / | 13 9 4 | -3 0 -3 | 58% 56% 60% | 117 125 110 | 14% 14% 14% | 9 6 3 | 10 5 5 | -1 +1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.14 0.46 1.75 | 221 143 294 | 21 6 15 | / 15 10 5 / | 1 0 1 | +6 -4 +10 | 70% 64% 75% | 139 100 176 | 33% 26% 38% | 4 1 3 | 4 3 1 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
1.12 1.09 1.14 | 194 199 190 | 16 8 8 | / 12 7 5 / | 5 3 2 | +4 +1 +3 | 87% 91% 83% | 129 119 139 | 24% 20% 29% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.10 0.76 1.41 | 210 178 239 | 17 7 10 | / 15 9 6 / | 4 2 2 | +2 -2 +4 | 91% 91% 92% | 149 132 165 | 16% 25% 10% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
1.09 1.55 0.68 | 219 267 176 | 18 11 7 | / 15 6 9 / | 8 2 6 | +3 +5 -2 | 74% 64% 83% | 149 177 123 | 28% 38% 19% | 3 2 1 | 4 2 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
1.02 1.13 0.92 | 205 198 213 | 17 8 9 | / 15 7 8 / | 6 3 3 | +2 +1 +1 | 78% 73% 83% | 146 135 156 | 17% 35% 7% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.35 1.72 0.95 | 275 327 221 | 21 13 8 | / 17 8 9 / | 6 3 3 | +4 +5 -1 | 74% 75% 73% | 163 192 131 | 24% 23% 27% | 4 1 3 | 1 0 1 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.02 1.07 0.97 | 188 163 216 | 16 7 9 | / 17 9 8 / | 5 4 1 | -1 -2 +1 | 61% 58% 64% | 129 121 139 | 22% 36% 14% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.72 0.45 1.01 | 181 131 237 | 13 4 9 | / 19 11 8 / | 5 5 0 | -6 -7 +1 | 61% 50% 73% | 123 101 146 | 13% 7% 19% | 2 0 2 | 3 3 0 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
0.71 0.61 0.83 | 161 148 176 | 12 6 6 | / 18 10 8 / | 6 3 3 | -6 -4 -2 | 70% 67% 73% | 103 81 127 | 21% 13% 29% | 3 2 1 | 5 4 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.69 0.31 1.11 | 157 108 211 | 10 3 7 | / 18 11 7 / | 4 0 4 | -8 -8 0 | 57% 33% 82% | 112 84 142 | 24% 29% 22% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.27 1.54 1.01 | 282 322 243 | 22 14 8 | / 18 8 10 / | 9 4 5 | +4 +6 -2 | 75% 75% 75% | 181 203 158 | 12% 7% 18% | 2 1 1 | 4 1 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
1.05 1.05 1.06 | 220 206 234 | 17 8 9 | / 19 9 10 / | 6 4 2 | -2 -1 -1 | 58% 75% 42% | 147 141 154 | 25% 19% 29% | 4 4 0 | 5 2 3 | -1 +2 -3 | |
|
0.96 1.02 0.89 | 194 216 174 | 18 10 8 | / 16 8 8 / | 4 2 2 | +2 +2 0 | 71% 83% 58% | 132 145 119 | 53% 73% 38% | 0 0 0 | 4 2 2 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.81 1.14 0.48 | 130 196 64 | 10 8 2 | / 15 7 8 / | 8 7 1 | -5 +1 -6 | 58% 75% 42% | 96 137 55 | 21% 13% 31% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.68 0.78 0.58 | 140 160 122 | 12 7 5 | / 19 9 10 / | 9 5 4 | -7 -2 -5 | 79% 92% 67% | 96 96 96 | 28% 19% 44% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.23 1.66 0.81 | 204 256 154 | 17 11 6 | / 13 4 9 / | 10 6 4 | +4 +7 -3 | 83% 92% 75% | 135 164 105 | 32% 43% 19% | 4 3 1 | 1 0 1 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
1.13 1.15 1.11 | 249 240 258 | 21 10 11 | / 18 8 10 / | 8 4 4 | +3 +2 +1 | 88% 92% 83% | 156 142 169 | 22% 14% 31% | 5 3 2 | 0 0 0 | +5 +3 +2 | |
|
1.04 1.01 1.07 | 174 142 207 | 15 6 9 | / 16 7 9 / | 13 7 6 | -1 -1 0 | 83% 92% 75% | 123 101 145 | 20% 13% 28% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.99 1.28 0.71 | 192 207 177 | 17 10 7 | / 17 6 11 / | 4 2 2 | 0 +4 -4 | 63% 75% 50% | 120 128 111 | 20% 14% 29% | 3 2 1 | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.94 0.94 0.93 | 176 175 179 | 17 9 8 | / 15 7 8 / | 3 2 1 | +2 +2 0 | 58% 58% 58% | 105 106 104 | 12% 17% 7% | 4 3 1 | 3 1 2 | +1 +2 -1 |
There's no way the team that:
vnvodich [#17]There's no way the team that:
- Has 3 CSGO veterans, 1 cracked Ukrainian, 1 coach, 2 analysts
- Has a massive facility in Texas for ping advantage
- Has beaten Gambit and Acend in a single tournament
- Is consistently second only to Sentinels in NA scene
is going to lose to a team of tier-3 ex-CSGO/Overwatch players... right?
Their facility is in LA and (I believe) they're playing from home
vnvodich [#17]There's no way the team that:
- Has 3 CSGO veterans, 1 cracked Ukrainian, 1 coach, 2 analysts
- Has a massive facility in Texas for ping advantage
- Has beaten Gambit and Acend in a single tournament
- Is consistently second only to Sentinels in NA scene
is going to lose to a team of tier-3 ex-CSGO/Overwatch players... right?
Well, they consistently lose to a team with no coach
Magel [#19]Their facility is in LA and (I believe) they're playing from home
they do have a facility in Texas that they used for Berlin qualifier though
geopoo [#21]Well, they consistently lose to a team with no coach
to be fair, most of NA teams (minus BBG) did
vnvodich [#22]they do have a facility in Texas that they used for Berlin qualifier though
that was complexity's not 100T's
100T were only using it for texas ping + nadeshot is good friends with the complexity owner
Ryan9500 [#24]that was complexity's not 100T's
100T were only using it for texas ping + nadeshot is good friends with the complexity owner
Oh right, my bad
100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
Lol shanks was -5 v leaf
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
dude let people hype whoever they want, i see u in many threads arguing that rise has no chance etc. Tmrw we'll find out whos better
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
Excuse me did you watch the matches where c9 played? Leaf jett diffed both penny and shanks. Leaf might be their strongest player.
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
wtf u braindead or what dude. c9 was missing everything BUT a strong duelist lol
LifeIsALie [#42]Odds are 1.3 in favour of 100t
I doubt rise win this but maybe shanks pops off
are you looking at betting odds? where?
redlight [#54]100T 2-0 RISE
Rise is pretty good, imo the Top 3 team at NA LCQ, but 100T is a step above them. 100T, despite losing Steel, has looked quite good.
we will see
PotatoCh1ps [#51]Tbh rise doesn't look coordinated in their set plays and defaults. The call-outs seemed disoriented and they won because c9b was not polished enough and didn't had good micro plays.
Just say "I'm a 100T fan and I want 100T to win". Don't make up all this bs.
vnvodich [#17]There's no way the team that:
- Has 3 CSGO veterans, 1 cracked Ukrainian, 1 coach, 2 analysts
- Has a massive facility in Texas for ping advantage
- Has beaten Gambit and Acend in a single tournament
- Is consistently second only to Sentinels in NA scene
is going to lose to a team of tier-3 ex-CSGO/Overwatch players... right?
you're dumb
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
ur dumb buddy
Kepin [#80]i mean it wouldn't be this close if rise didn't throw some rounds on defender side. man, seems like rise know how to exposed boi. this might be 2-0 for them.
yeah rise are both good in ascent and haven
WashedUpCsgoStar [#72]Nearly takes down Gambit... lets add a random and remove our IGL. lul
they did take down gambit?
AsianSensation [#78]100T getting beaten by Asians KEKW
why do we have to make it a race thing? can't we just be happy for rise? they played a great game
AsianSensation [#85]they did take down gambit?
i meant take them down in the whole event, they were close to winning it all.
OKMAN [#82]yeah rise are both good in ascent and haven
i personally love to watch shanks on haven but they should take ascent. i dont think give a momentum to team like 100t is a good idea.
egirl84yearoldrussianman [#87]why do we have to make it a race thing? can't we just be happy for rise? they played a great game
Rise is vietnamese asian american team, what's wrong with that?
AsianSensation [#98]wouldnt be suprised if Nitr0 alone get paid more than half the Rise team lol, 100T is seriously overpaid for how they play
i heard somewhere that nitr0 gets paid 250k a year
HaSanity [#96]Steel saw one whiff from derrek and said one word. Overwatch. nuff said. please come watch his streams
I laughed so hard when he said that lmao
HaSanity [#96]Steel saw one whiff from derrek and said one word. Overwatch. nuff said. please come watch his streams
More Context pls? Sounds funny but I missed the stream
FsuJordan [#105]No matter the outcome hoping for a entertaining map 3.
and we get that 'cause Nitr0 is using cypher
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
LifeIsALie [#9]100t 2-0 C9B People think ti would be easy for C9 but they get absolutely destroyed on ascent but the second map goes into double OT with 100t just taking it 15-13. Asuna drops 24 each map
Your life is a lie
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
im sad
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
My man single handedly jinxed 100t. Hope you're happy
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
KEKW
redlight [#54]100T 2-0 RISE
Rise is pretty good, imo the Top 3 team at NA LCQ, but 100T is a step above them. 100T, despite losing Steel, has looked quite good.
Aged well.
AsianSensation [#100]lmao that's overpaid af
I used to have this name a long time ago lmao. Did you play bloons?
PotatoCh1ps [#51]Tbh rise doesn't look coordinated in their set plays and defaults. The call-outs seemed disoriented and they won because c9b was not polished enough and didn't had good micro plays.
didnt age well
ktran [#142]like steel?
steel is different. He's already payed the time, while Shanks and Poised ran away from it by switching to Valorant. Besides, he's not even on 100T now.