GenG 2-1 C9
completed
... 11 more matches
Friday, October 29th
9:30 PM EDT
Patch 3.07
100T ban Bind; Rise ban Icebox; 100T pick Breeze; Rise pick Ascent; 100T pick Haven
Betting
$100 on
Rise
returned
$269 at 2.69 pre-match odds
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Maps/Stats
All Kills
First Kills
Op Kills
Shanks
Rise
|
neptune
Rise
|
Derrek
Rise
|
supamen
Rise
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
11
10
+1
|
8
14
-6
|
9
11
-2
|
9
10
-1
|
17
6
+11
|
|
b0i
100T
|
7
10
-3
|
11
9
+2
|
3
12
-9
|
10
8
+2
|
6
12
-6
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
12
9
+3
|
8
9
-1
|
9
4
+5
|
10
12
-2
|
3
8
-5
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
10
8
+2
|
16
11
+5
|
14
11
+3
|
11
10
+1
|
8
15
-7
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
11
11
+0
|
8
16
-8
|
9
5
+4
|
8
7
+1
|
19
12
+7
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
neptune
Rise
|
Derrek
Rise
|
supamen
Rise
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
4
1
+3
|
2
1
+1
|
2
2
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
0
2
-2
|
|
b0i
100T
|
0
3
-3
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
2
2
+0
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
1
1
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
3
1
+2
|
2
4
-2
|
3
2
+1
|
3
2
+1
|
2
5
-3
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
2
3
-1
|
2
1
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
|
1
4
-3
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
neptune
Rise
|
Derrek
Rise
|
supamen
Rise
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
4
0
+4
|
|
3
0
+3
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
|
b0i
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
5
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
47
|
5
|
1
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
10
|
6
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
6
|
0
|
|
b0i
100T
|
|
5
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
47
|
4
|
1
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
11
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
56
|
2
|
0
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
8
|
4
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
10
|
1
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
|
9
|
2
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
1
|
3
|
|
supamen
Rise
|
|
10
|
|
1
|
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
|
55
|
8
|
1
|
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
7
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
6
|
2
|
|
Derrek
Rise
|
|
8
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
4
|
2
|
|
neptune
Rise
|
|
11
|
4
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
58
|
2
|
0
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
neptune
Rise
|
Derrek
Rise
|
supamen
Rise
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
5
6
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
3
5
-2
|
2
2
+0
|
6
3
+3
|
|
b0i
100T
|
1
5
-4
|
2
2
+0
|
1
5
-4
|
3
2
+1
|
1
3
-2
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
6
2
+4
|
3
4
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
4
4
+0
|
2
4
-2
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
2
1
+1
|
7
5
+2
|
4
4
+0
|
5
5
+0
|
3
6
-3
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
3
4
-1
|
2
6
-4
|
4
1
+3
|
1
3
-2
|
5
4
+1
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
neptune
Rise
|
Derrek
Rise
|
supamen
Rise
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
|
b0i
100T
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
2
0
+2
|
1
1
+0
|
|
2
1
+1
|
0
3
-3
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
neptune
Rise
|
Derrek
Rise
|
supamen
Rise
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
4
0
+4
|
|
2
0
+2
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
b0i
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
2
Round 18
neptune Derrek
Round 19
Shanks POISED |
1
Round 8
Shanks neptune supamen |
|
|
1
Round 13
neptune |
|
1
Round 8
Shanks neptune supamen |
|
|
49
|
1
|
0
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
4
Round 5
Shanks POISED
Round 11
supamen POISED
Round 15
Derrek neptune
Round 22
Derrek neptune |
2
Round 6
supamen neptune POISED
Round 12
supamen Derrek neptune |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
1
|
0
|
|
b0i
100T
|
|
|
1
Round 10
Shanks neptune Derrek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
2
|
1
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
5
Round 3
Derrek Shanks
Round 13
Shanks POISED
Round 14
supamen POISED
Round 17
neptune POISED
Round 18
supamen Shanks |
1
Round 21
Derrek POISED neptune |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
1
|
0
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
2
Round 3
neptune POISED
Round 14
Shanks Derrek |
1
Round 9
neptune supamen POISED |
|
|
1
Round 6
Shanks |
|
|
|
|
38
|
5
|
0
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
|
1
Round 19
Ethan nitr0 |
2
Round 6
nitr0 Asuna b0i
Round 17
Ethan Hiko nitr0 |
1
Round 22
Hiko nitr0 b0i Ethan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
0
|
0
|
|
supamen
Rise
|
|
4
Round 7
nitr0 Asuna
Round 9
b0i Hiko
Round 15
Hiko Asuna
Round 21
Hiko nitr0 |
|
|
|
2
Round 15
Asuna
Round 21
nitr0 |
|
|
|
|
56
|
3
|
0
|
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
4
Round 1
Asuna b0i
Round 2
nitr0 Ethan
Round 7
b0i Hiko
Round 16
Asuna Hiko |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
3
|
1
|
|
Derrek
Rise
|
|
2
Round 9
nitr0 Ethan
Round 12
b0i nitr0 |
1
Round 23
Asuna nitr0 Hiko |
|
|
1
Round 9
Ethan |
|
|
|
|
52
|
2
|
2
|
|
neptune
Rise
|
|
5
Round 2
Hiko Asuna
Round 13
b0i nitr0
Round 15
Ethan nitr0
Round 18
Asuna nitr0
Round 24
Ethan Hiko |
1
Round 11
b0i Ethan Hiko |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
1
|
0
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
neptune
Rise
|
Derrek
Rise
|
supamen
Rise
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
3
3
+0
|
1
5
-4
|
3
2
+1
|
4
4
+0
|
6
1
+5
|
|
b0i
100T
|
2
3
-1
|
4
6
-2
|
2
1
+1
|
5
3
+2
|
4
2
+2
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
4
1
+3
|
4
2
+2
|
4
3
+1
|
3
5
-2
|
1
1
+0
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
4
4
+0
|
6
4
+2
|
7
2
+5
|
2
2
+0
|
2
3
-1
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
6
2
+4
|
2
4
-2
|
2
2
+0
|
3
2
+1
|
5
5
+0
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
neptune
Rise
|
Derrek
Rise
|
supamen
Rise
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
2
0
+2
|
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
b0i
100T
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
2
0
+2
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
0
2
-2
|
2
0
+2
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
1
3
-2
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
neptune
Rise
|
Derrek
Rise
|
supamen
Rise
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
b0i
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
2
Round 13
 supamen Derrek
Round 20
neptune Shanks |
1
Round 4
Derrek Shanks supamen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
1
|
1
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
3
Round 8
neptune Derrek
Round 9
POISED neptune
Round 11
POISED Shanks |
2
Round 1
Derrek Shanks neptune
Round 7
supamen neptune Derrek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
1
|
0
|
|
b0i
100T
|
|
4
Round 10
neptune supamen
Round 11
neptune Derrek
Round 14
Shanks neptune
Round 23
Derrek supamen |
|
|
|
|
1
Round 23
supamen Derrek |
|
|
|
57
|
1
|
0
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
2
Round 2
supamen Derrek
Round 14
supamen POISED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
1
|
0
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
2
Round 13
neptune Shanks
Round 15
Shanks POISED |
|
1
Round 18
Derrek supamen POISED Shanks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
3
|
1
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
|
4
Round 12
Hiko b0i
Round 15
b0i Asuna
Round 19
Ethan nitr0
Round 20
nitr0 Asuna |
|
|
|
1
Round 18
Ethan |
|
|
|
|
44
|
1
|
0
|
|
supamen
Rise
|
|
2
Round 9
Hiko nitr0
Round 12
Asuna nitr0 |
|
1
Round 17
nitr0 b0i Asuna Hiko |
|
1
Round 15
Ethan |
1
Round 9
Hiko nitr0 |
|
|
|
56
|
2
|
1
|
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
|
2
Round 1
Ethan b0i nitr0
Round 16
Ethan Asuna b0i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
1
|
1
|
|
Derrek
Rise
|
|
3
Round 18
Hiko b0i
Round 19
Hiko Asuna
Round 23
Ethan Hiko |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
1
|
0
|
|
neptune
Rise
|
|
3
Round 3
b0i nitr0
Round 5
Ethan b0i
Round 13
Asuna nitr0 |
1
Round 21
nitr0 Asuna b0i |
1
Round 6
b0i Asuna Hiko nitr0 |
|
|
1
Round 6
Hiko nitr0 |
|
|
|
68
|
1
|
0
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
neptune
Rise
|
Derrek
Rise
|
supamen
Rise
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
3
1
+2
|
4
5
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
3
4
-1
|
5
2
+3
|
|
b0i
100T
|
4
2
+2
|
5
1
+4
|
0
6
-6
|
2
3
-1
|
1
7
-6
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
2
6
-4
|
1
3
-2
|
4
0
+4
|
3
3
+0
|
0
3
-3
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
4
3
+1
|
3
2
+1
|
3
5
-2
|
4
3
+1
|
3
6
-3
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
2
5
-3
|
4
6
-2
|
3
2
+1
|
4
2
+2
|
9
3
+6
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
neptune
Rise
|
Derrek
Rise
|
supamen
Rise
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
b0i
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
2
-2
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
1
2
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
neptune
Rise
|
Derrek
Rise
|
supamen
Rise
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b0i
100T
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
1
Round 6
supamen Derrek |
1
Round 7
Shanks  neptune Derrek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
3
|
0
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
3
Round 8
supamen  POISED
Round 15
Shanks supamen
Round 21
Derrek Shanks |
2
Round 4
Shanks Derrek supamen
Round 18
POISED Shanks supamen |
|
|
1
Round 4
supamen |
|
|
|
|
58
|
4
|
0
|
|
b0i
100T
|
|
1
Round 8
Shanks neptune |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
1
|
0
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
4
Round 5
Shanks supamen
Round 6
Shanks POISED
Round 15
POISED Derrek
Round 21
POISED supamen |
|
|
|
|
1
Round 15
POISED Derrek |
|
|
|
54
|
0
|
0
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
4
Round 5
POISED neptune
Round 9
POISED supamen
Round 11
neptune POISED
Round 22
Shanks POISED |
3
Round 3
neptune Derrek POISED
Round 12
supamen neptune Derrek
Round 16
Shanks Derrek supamen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
2
|
0
|
|
Shanks
Rise
|
|
4
Round 2
Ethan Hiko
Round 12
Hiko Ethan
Round 14
nitr0 b0i
Round 20
Hiko Ethan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
0
|
3
|
|
supamen
Rise
|
|
4
Round 4
nitr0 Hiko
Round 10
Hiko b0i
Round 13
Ethan nitr0
Round 23
Hiko Asuna |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
3
|
0
|
|
POISED
Rise
|
|
3
Round 1
Asuna b0i
Round 3
nitr0 b0i
Round 18
b0i nitr0 |
1
Round 17
Asuna Ethan b0i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
2
|
0
|
|
Derrek
Rise
|
|
3
Round 13
Asuna b0i
Round 20
Asuna b0i
Round 23
nitr0 b0i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
1
|
0
|
|
neptune
Rise
|
|
3
Round 10
Ethan nitr0
Round 14
Ethan Hiko
Round 24
Ethan nitr0 |
2
Round 11
nitr0 Hiko b0i
Round 19
Ethan nitr0 Hiko |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
0
|
0
|
Head-to-head
Past Matches
There's no way the team that:
- Has 3 CSGO veterans, 1 cracked Ukrainian, 1 coach, 2 analysts
- Has a massive facility in Texas for ping advantage
- Has beaten Gambit and Acend in a single tournament
- Is consistently second only to Sentinels in NA scene
is going to lose to a team of tier-3 ex-CSGO/Overwatch players... right?
vnvodich [#17]There's no way the team that:
- Has 3 CSGO veterans, 1 cracked Ukrainian, 1 coach, 2 analysts
- Has a massive facility in Texas for ping advantage
- Has beaten Gambit and Acend in a single tournament
- Is consistently second only to Sentinels in NA scene
is going to lose to a team of tier-3 ex-CSGO/Overwatch players... right?
Their facility is in LA and (I believe) they're playing from home
vnvodich [#17]There's no way the team that:
- Has 3 CSGO veterans, 1 cracked Ukrainian, 1 coach, 2 analysts
- Has a massive facility in Texas for ping advantage
- Has beaten Gambit and Acend in a single tournament
- Is consistently second only to Sentinels in NA scene
is going to lose to a team of tier-3 ex-CSGO/Overwatch players... right?
Well, they consistently lose to a team with no coach
Magel [#19]Their facility is in LA and (I believe) they're playing from home
they do have a facility in Texas that they used for Berlin qualifier though
geopoo [#21]Well, they consistently lose to a team with no coach
to be fair, most of NA teams (minus BBG) did
vnvodich [#22]they do have a facility in Texas that they used for Berlin qualifier though
that was complexity's not 100T's
100T were only using it for texas ping + nadeshot is good friends with the complexity owner
Ryan9500 [#24]that was complexity's not 100T's
100T were only using it for texas ping + nadeshot is good friends with the complexity owner
Oh right, my bad
100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
Lol shanks was -5 v leaf
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
dude let people hype whoever they want, i see u in many threads arguing that rise has no chance etc. Tmrw we'll find out whos better
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
Excuse me did you watch the matches where c9 played? Leaf jett diffed both penny and shanks. Leaf might be their strongest player.
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
wtf u braindead or what dude. c9 was missing everything BUT a strong duelist lol
LifeIsALie [#42]Odds are 1.3 in favour of 100t
I doubt rise win this but maybe shanks pops off
are you looking at betting odds? where?
redlight [#54]100T 2-0 RISE
Rise is pretty good, imo the Top 3 team at NA LCQ, but 100T is a step above them. 100T, despite losing Steel, has looked quite good.
we will see
PotatoCh1ps [#51]Tbh rise doesn't look coordinated in their set plays and defaults. The call-outs seemed disoriented and they won because c9b was not polished enough and didn't had good micro plays.
Just say "I'm a 100T fan and I want 100T to win". Don't make up all this bs.
vnvodich [#17]There's no way the team that:
- Has 3 CSGO veterans, 1 cracked Ukrainian, 1 coach, 2 analysts
- Has a massive facility in Texas for ping advantage
- Has beaten Gambit and Acend in a single tournament
- Is consistently second only to Sentinels in NA scene
is going to lose to a team of tier-3 ex-CSGO/Overwatch players... right?
you're dumb
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
ur dumb buddy
Kepin [#80]i mean it wouldn't be this close if rise didn't throw some rounds on defender side. man, seems like rise know how to exposed boi. this might be 2-0 for them.
yeah rise are both good in ascent and haven
WashedUpCsgoStar [#72]Nearly takes down Gambit... lets add a random and remove our IGL. lul
they did take down gambit?
AsianSensation [#78]100T getting beaten by Asians KEKW
why do we have to make it a race thing? can't we just be happy for rise? they played a great game
AsianSensation [#85]they did take down gambit?
i meant take them down in the whole event, they were close to winning it all.
OKMAN [#82]yeah rise are both good in ascent and haven
i personally love to watch shanks on haven but they should take ascent. i dont think give a momentum to team like 100t is a good idea.
egirl84yearoldrussianman [#87]why do we have to make it a race thing? can't we just be happy for rise? they played a great game
Rise is vietnamese asian american team, what's wrong with that?
AsianSensation [#98]wouldnt be suprised if Nitr0 alone get paid more than half the Rise team lol, 100T is seriously overpaid for how they play
i heard somewhere that nitr0 gets paid 250k a year
HaSanity [#96]Steel saw one whiff from derrek and said one word. Overwatch. nuff said. please come watch his streams
I laughed so hard when he said that lmao
HaSanity [#96]Steel saw one whiff from derrek and said one word. Overwatch. nuff said. please come watch his streams
More Context pls? Sounds funny but I missed the stream
FsuJordan [#105]No matter the outcome hoping for a entertaining map 3.
and we get that 'cause Nitr0 is using cypher
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
b0i supremacy
LifeIsALie [#9]100t 2-0 C9B People think ti would be easy for C9 but they get absolutely destroyed on ascent but the second map goes into double OT with 100t just taking it 15-13. Asuna drops 24 each map
Your life is a lie
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
im sad
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
My man single handedly jinxed 100t. Hope you're happy
LifeIsALie [#37]100t 2-1 RISE
STOP overhyping rise!!
Earlier so many C9B fanboys were saying because C9 managed to 2-0 V1, they would beat 100t , XSET and win LCQ lmfao.
Fact of the matter is:
C9B is still not a complete team. They still do not have a strong duelist. Leaf was getting jett diffed all of the time. IT was not that hard for rise to beat C9.
100t will beat rise 2-0 or 2-1 if haven comes into play and will go on to win the LCQ.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is on massive amounts of hopium
KEKW
redlight [#54]100T 2-0 RISE
Rise is pretty good, imo the Top 3 team at NA LCQ, but 100T is a step above them. 100T, despite losing Steel, has looked quite good.
Aged well.
AsianSensation [#100]lmao that's overpaid af
I used to have this name a long time ago lmao. Did you play bloons?
PotatoCh1ps [#51]Tbh rise doesn't look coordinated in their set plays and defaults. The call-outs seemed disoriented and they won because c9b was not polished enough and didn't had good micro plays.
didnt age well
ktran [#142]like steel?
steel is different. He's already payed the time, while Shanks and Poised ran away from it by switching to Valorant. Besides, he's not even on 100T now.
Discord