Champions vs Masters discussion

whats the correct comparison between the two in your opinion? I think 1 Champions = 2 Masters personally, but other ppl seem to disagree.

1 Champs = 4 Masters

nihso [#2]

1 Champs = 4 Masters

ok you glaze TenZ but then say this so im kinda confused here

1 champs = 1.5 masters

fenis said hes rather get 2 masters than a champs bc then people would be able to call it a fluke but imo 2 champs > 4 masters for sure

1 champs = 1.5 masters

1 Champs = 3 masters

teilwal [#5]

fenis said hes rather get 2 masters than a champs bc then people would be able to call it a fluke but imo 2 champs > 4 masters for sure

2 champs over 3 masters, 4 masters definitely better than 2 champs

sensucks [#3]

ok you glaze TenZ but then say this so im kinda confused here

i dont even believe what i said. Also I glaze johnqt more than tenz

3 champs = 4 masters

1 champs=1.5 masters. though some masters are more impressive than some champs.

I think 1 champs = 1.5 masters is a solid comparison

beaver_man [#4]

1 champs = 1.5 masters

unless it’s ch0na EDG flukers

ch1na > amer0cas

GambleNats [#13]

ch1na > amer0cas

We got 2 champs and they are not flukes, how many do Australia got

Champs > Masters obvs but in the case of Masters depends on how many teams are playing, ie. Madrid (8 teams) is lesser than Shanghai (12 teams).

1.25-1.5 imo

zephyrara [#8]

2 champs over 3 masters, 4 masters definitely better than 2 champs

not at all

ain’t this the guy who said 2024 EDG > 2024 GENG?

nobody___100 [#18]

ain’t this the guy who said 2024 EDG > 2024 GENG?

this iteration of edg matches up with them but i think geng is slightly better