0

You can win 3 Masters

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
Azzelastia

But being a World Champion is a feeling that you will never experience.

#2
BulkyLettuce
25
Frags
+

you are correct, c0m is the goat

#26
ctabust
0
Frags
+

c1m

#3
n1cf
4
Frags
+

you are correct, cNed is the goat

#60
UvuvwevwevweOnyetenyevwe
1
Frags
+

Being "THE FIRST VALORANT CHAMPION" is more special, the first page of the book is a historical moment.

#62
Galactc
0
Frags
+

Only one on that team that deserves it

#63
n1cf
0
Frags
+

nah, starxo and zeek was also valid back in the day

#4
DeyahAlAjarma
-13
Frags
+

you are correct, Rb is the goat

#14
Subreezy
7
Frags
+

one of these things is not like the other

#19
EzWinz
0
Frags
+

erm, what the what

#22
SomeoneLikeU
-6
Frags
+

Why is he getting downvoted but not the cShit guy or the C0M guy.

#23
HiroshimaLover45
10
Frags
+

because rb hasn't won champs?

#57
SomeoneLikeU
-1
Frags
+

Yea but he wasn’t one of the worst on his team ever.

#39
GYKM
0
Frags
+

did this really deserve all those downvotes?

#59
K4ziuHa
2
Frags
+

yea

#5
EzWinz
-2
Frags
+

Winning 3 masters is better then winning champions as masters is an INTERNATIONAL tournament so as Champions so you would experience the same feeling

#7
n1cf
2
Frags
+

no

#8
Azzelastia
-13
Frags
+

Being a World Champion (VCT Champs Winner) is worth more than winning 3 Masters

#9
EzWinz
1
Frags
+

Usually the rates is this winning 2 masters = champions
Winning 3 masters = champions + master

#10
flanador
-15
Frags
+

Retarded ass take

#11
EzWinz
1
Frags
+

Did your team win a champs nah i dont think so

#13
flanador
-6
Frags
+

My team doesn’t need to win champs to refute some retarded ass shit

#15
EzWinz
-1
Frags
+

If you understand what i am saying is that there is 3 international tournaments 2 masters and 1 champions
Champions is equalvent to 2 masters as they will reach equal supply.

#21
flanador
-4
Frags
+

Thanks for the yap session and all, but equating 2 masters to a champs is stupid. Even more so 3 masters to a champs/masters.

You’re simply devaluing/inflating the worth of said trophies. 3 masters being the equal to a champs would be fair at best.

Acend as a whole fluked that trophy so at least choose comparable players. Lock/In doesn’t have the same worth as a masters/champions to add onto my point.

#24
EzWinz
0
Frags
+

Explain 2 masters is the default in riot, and one champs is default so value wise it is 2 master - 1 champions
Mr. Yappington

#25
flanador
-3
Frags
+

You're equating 2 masters = 1 champs because riot holds 2 masters and 1 champs only? Seriously? Actual smooth brain

#16
EzWinz
0
Frags
+

Clearly you don't understand valorant esports and all other esports

#18
EzWinz
0
Frags
+

Alright let's just say this who is more valueable Chronicle who won berlin, sao paulo, and tokyo or BoneCold who won champs

#46
c4rrotstix
1
Frags
+

So Sacy > Chronicle All time?

Chronicle won 2021 masters and 2023 masters which = Sacy's 2022 champs, and single elim lock in << Masters 2024

So Sacy > chronicle?

#49
EzWinz
0
Frags
+

No like valueabilty not players but in trophies

#6
Simp4S0m
2
Frags
+

you are correct, s0m is the goat

#12
SmithAndWinston
8
Frags
+

Why value champs so high when right before every champs there are always huge meta changes and a new map introduced into the pool

#17
EzWinz
1
Frags
+

on god bro

#33
juju112
3
Frags
+

way more money, more teams way more valuable.

#48
SmithAndWinston
1
Frags
+

Good argument, the prize pool difference is pretty massive but that means we would have to start devaluing the first masters of the year when its prize pool is only 500k to the 1mil of the 2nd masters of the year.

The main problem comes from Riot doing a poor job of making the distinction between masters and champs in the first place back in 2021. Now all fans just naturally value both events as a major in their eyes since 2021. I think its still poorly advertised between the difference of the events. Champs just feels like its just marketing the champs bundle or whatever new agent or map they're releasing, and the hype from fans dont feel immensely different.

#61
juju112
1
Frags
+

masters 1 should be less impressive than masters 2; 8 team event with a shorter qualification span allows flukes or teams without actual long standing skill to be better. (KC was able to make masters off really good set plays and comps) also the better teams aren't necessarily the teams that have outstanding play but rather teams that have gotten a stable base on the game before others. (NRG wasn't good but was able to pull through fine in kickoff due to being a team that already had chemistry between 2 groups of players.) Even a team like sentinels wasn't necessarily better at the time than any 2023 champs contender as much as they just had so many reps in and was simply ahead of other teams. The rule normally is either more teams = more prestigious (except for lock-in which had no qualification process) or later in the season = more prestigious

#37
LouBag
0
Frags
+

dude has never played real sports and it shows.

same reason the Olympics are valued more than any other international competition

#45
SmithAndWinston
0
Frags
+

I can't believe a couch potato who types on VLR is trying to tell another user they haven't played sports before😂😂😂

Most casual fans/normies do not care about or feel for the hype difference between masters and champs. Both events are just a marketing ploy for riot to promote skins, new maps, or new agents.

If Riot cared for the competitive integrity and prestige value between champs and masters. They wouldn't make so many questionable changes to schedules, formats, and huge meta-shifts in the middle of the season.

The Olympics is an event every 4 years to promote world peace and unity through a worldwide showcase of various sporting competitions with teams based on countries. Champs comes nowhere close to what the Olympics is trying to promote or is in principle.

BTW certain sports like soccer value the World Cup as a more prestigious and bigger event than the Olympics.

And there's no way you're trying to say that a masters in valorant is like the In Season Tournament in the NBA and champs in valorant equates to the NBA Finals

#47
LouBag
1
Frags
+

yes, that is what I am saying.

it's the END OF THE YEAR TOURNAMENT

you gain CHAMPIONS POINTS from the lower tier tournaments

just because you can't seem to see the difference between the two events doesn't mean there isn't one.

1 champ every year. it's the biggest tournament. period. end of story.

#50
Azzelastia
-2
Frags
+

Masters are glorified qualifiers for Champs

#54
Tryeue2
0
Frags
+

this is just copium speaking because the ex eg players couldnt find their form this year

#20
DaM1
0
Frags
+

.

#27
Kirya
4
Frags
+

Champs event is 1.5 of masters MAXIMUM
Champs are not rly that much different from masters

#52
emirerays
0
Frags
+

Bro prize pool is 2.250.000 million what you sayin

#53
Kirya
1
Frags
+

so? Winning 2 masters events is way harder and more impressive

#55
emirerays
0
Frags
+

Not really

#29
amonsus
0
Frags
+

Correct, Havoc is the goat

#51
cyk
0
Frags
+

Kiles the best sentinel itw without any doubt

#56
ShuGo
1
Frags
+

Being a Champion >>> being a Master

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment