naTs for 50 frags
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.22 1.04 1.40 | 271 232 312 | 25 11 14 | / 20 9 11 / | 2 1 1 | +5 +2 +3 | 69% 69% 69% | 156 131 181 | 31% 29% 33% | 4 1 3 | 4 2 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.06 0.97 1.15 | 221 202 241 | 20 9 11 | / 18 8 10 / | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | 69% 69% 69% | 147 140 154 | 34% 31% 36% | 0 0 0 | 4 4 0 | -4 -4 0 | |
|
1.00 1.28 0.73 | 236 334 139 | 20 15 5 | / 20 11 9 / | 11 6 5 | 0 +4 -4 | 81% 92% 69% | 165 231 99 | 37% 53% 20% | 3 2 1 | 5 2 3 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.92 0.96 0.88 | 167 191 143 | 15 9 6 | / 16 8 8 / | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | 62% 77% 46% | 108 118 97 | 25% 24% 26% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.81 1.08 0.55 | 152 150 154 | 13 7 6 | / 19 7 12 / | 12 7 5 | -6 0 -6 | 65% 77% 54% | 104 97 110 | 32% 54% 20% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.15 1.52 0.78 | 183 213 154 | 16 10 6 | / 14 5 9 / | 9 7 2 | +2 +5 -3 | 69% 77% 62% | 120 140 101 | 33% 33% 32% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.00 1.25 0.75 | 227 294 161 | 20 13 7 | / 19 9 10 / | 6 4 2 | +1 +4 -3 | 69% 85% 54% | 151 195 107 | 20% 17% 25% | 2 1 1 | 4 3 1 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.97 1.07 0.87 | 223 191 256 | 19 10 9 | / 19 7 12 / | 8 7 1 | 0 +3 -3 | 62% 77% 46% | 140 119 162 | 21% 24% 19% | 4 0 4 | 2 1 1 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
0.97 0.90 1.04 | 243 257 229 | 23 12 11 | / 22 11 11 / | 3 0 3 | +1 +1 0 | 65% 69% 62% | 157 164 150 | 39% 47% 33% | 6 4 2 | 5 2 3 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.91 0.58 1.23 | 162 109 215 | 15 5 10 | / 19 10 9 / | 9 3 6 | -4 -5 +1 | 81% 85% 77% | 105 60 150 | 29% 13% 38% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.59 1.30 1.45 | 312 355 245 | 50 31 19 | / 30 17 13 / | 16 9 7 | +20 +14 +6 | 89% 96% 82% | 198 234 157 | 35% 50% 21% | 8 6 2 | 5 2 3 | +3 +4 -1 | |
|
0.90 1.49 1.17 | 206 165 257 | 35 14 21 | / 28 16 12 / | 11 7 4 | +7 -2 +9 | 74% 68% 82% | 142 123 165 | 29% 25% 31% | 2 1 1 | 4 4 0 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.97 1.28 1.12 | 223 216 243 | 37 19 18 | / 32 18 14 / | 5 3 2 | +5 +1 +4 | 77% 76% 77% | 139 127 152 | 32% 35% 29% | 10 5 5 | 5 3 2 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
1.05 0.97 1.01 | 200 203 189 | 34 19 15 | / 30 16 14 / | 6 4 2 | +4 +3 +1 | 68% 76% 59% | 123 130 115 | 23% 21% 26% | 7 3 4 | 2 1 1 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
0.90 0.74 0.83 | 155 152 158 | 25 14 11 | / 34 17 17 / | 21 10 11 | -9 -3 -6 | 72% 76% 68% | 117 119 114 | 27% 38% 18% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.73 1.32 1.05 | 226 159 272 | 37 13 24 | / 37 18 19 / | 13 4 9 | 0 -5 +5 | 77% 77% 76% | 131 84 172 | 28% 32% 26% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.63 1.25 0.99 | 232 197 259 | 17 6 11 | / 18 9 9 / | 5 1 4 | -1 -3 +2 | 71% 56% 83% | 143 129 155 | 27% 29% 26% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.07 0.87 0.97 | 223 191 256 | 19 10 9 | / 19 7 12 / | 8 7 1 | 0 +3 -3 | 62% 77% 46% | 140 119 162 | 21% 24% 19% | 4 0 4 | 2 1 1 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
1.05 0.82 0.93 | 158 181 144 | 25 13 12 | / 30 13 17 / | 13 8 5 | -5 0 -5 | 66% 64% 68% | 106 118 95 | 28% 28% 28% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.84 0.73 0.78 | 158 202 134 | 27 15 12 | / 35 17 18 / | 10 6 4 | -8 -2 -6 | 60% 73% 48% | 112 131 96 | 14% 14% 14% | 2 1 1 | 10 7 3 | -8 -6 -2 | |
|
0.63 0.69 0.66 | 171 181 177 | 29 13 16 | / 42 20 22 / | 9 4 5 | -13 -7 -6 | 60% 64% 56% | 120 119 120 | 39% 42% 36% | 6 4 2 | 10 2 8 | -4 +2 -6 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2.01 1.92 2.13 | 387 378 399 | 30 16 14 | / 10 6 4 / | 5 3 2 | +20 +10 +10 | 100% 100% 100% | 240 238 242 | 33% 47% 21% | 5 4 1 | 0 0 0 | +5 +4 +1 | |
|
1.32 0.82 1.98 | 191 125 280 | 15 5 10 | / 10 8 2 / | 9 6 3 | +5 -3 +8 | 81% 67% 100% | 137 104 181 | 23% 16% 26% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.12 1.15 1.09 | 232 216 256 | 19 10 9 | / 14 8 6 / | 4 4 0 | +5 +2 +3 | 76% 75% 78% | 142 142 141 | 21% 18% 26% | 4 1 3 | 1 1 0 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.99 0.90 1.11 | 175 199 143 | 12 8 4 | / 12 9 3 / | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | 86% 83% 89% | 118 123 110 | 35% 44% 14% | 6 4 2 | 1 1 0 | +5 +3 +2 | |
|
0.84 0.70 1.02 | 157 154 163 | 12 7 5 | / 15 10 5 / | 9 3 6 | -3 -3 0 | 81% 75% 89% | 133 143 120 | 24% 30% 17% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.22 0.96 1.42 | 289 232 333 | 22 8 14 | / 18 8 10 / | 4 1 3 | +4 0 +4 | 71% 67% 75% | 163 118 196 | 27% 58% 19% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.99 0.63 1.25 | 232 197 259 | 17 6 11 | / 18 9 9 / | 5 1 4 | -1 -3 +2 | 71% 56% 83% | 143 129 155 | 27% 29% 26% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.66 0.38 0.87 | 133 135 132 | 9 3 6 | / 16 8 8 / | 4 1 3 | -7 -5 -2 | 62% 44% 75% | 88 85 90 | 21% 15% 24% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 | |
|
0.52 0.25 0.72 | 89 69 105 | 7 2 5 | / 16 8 8 / | 4 2 2 | -9 -6 -3 | 48% 56% 42% | 64 39 83 | 4% 0% 6% | 0 0 0 | 6 4 2 | -6 -4 -2 | |
|
0.28 0.23 0.31 | 98 70 121 | 6 1 5 | / 20 9 11 / | 6 4 2 | -14 -8 -6 | 52% 56% 50% | 73 54 87 | 38% 33% 42% | 0 0 0 | 5 0 5 | -5 0 -5 |
raka_gg [#8]Gambit 2:0 surely?
This did not age well LOL. Steel played alright but his 5head plays were unmatched. Hiko clutched and also had massive impact. Please rethink your comment LOL
raka_gg [#8]Gambit 2:0 surely?
You do realize it says "edited" right? We can tell you said 100T instead of Gambit and you're just too shameless with no backbone.
sicktank [#15]GMB Gamblers gonna eat ramen for the rest of the Tourney XD
and nats provent to be a rat wannabe. XD. but GMB should win this one EZ. i mean who's gonna lose to HL? Slapping CR, and Winning HL to get to playoff is a n achievement to brag about XD.
sicktank [#17]and nats provent to be a rat wannabe. XD. but GMB should win this one EZ. i mean who's gonna lose to HL? Slapping CR, and Winning HL to get to playoff is a n achievement to brag about XD.
for #1 EMEA seed that is.
JettOnetap [#31]CR 2-0
Kinda scared of Gambit as 2nd seed so hope they choke and NA gets a free win against CR
Gambit could easily choke as they did with 100t, and even tho I like them, I'm actually scared of the, being 2nd seed cuz I think they can easily lose
I think CR will win somehow idk.
When they beat Havan one of the players looked in the camera and said "lets go gambit!" So I think they will be fired up. Also gambit will have all the pressure after their 100t Choke and CR will have none because they won their first series for thier region.
Also eu is trash.
zombs_fanboy [#50]I think CR will win somehow idk.
When they beat Havan one of the players looked in the camera and said "lets go gambit!" So I think they will be fired up. Also gambit will have all the pressure after their 100t Choke and CR will have none because they won their first series for thier region.
Also eu is trash.
zombs worse than gold 2s
Leytonnn [#5]Loser of the 100T GMB match will be here playing against Havan bc like Iceland CR won't win a match in Berlin
Personally I think it'll be GMB 2-0 Havan but it could also 100T 2-0 Havan
Or maybe gambit 0-2 CR
alice_ [#72]I noticed that CR was playing without medusa for the first match against Gambit. Lets see how much of a difference that makes.
Is he their top player? Don't know much about the Asian scene
idkwhoshouldisupport [#71]LOOKS LIKE HE'LL HAVE TO. LOL.
Don't forget SMB 13-1 gambit on Ascent 1st map in emea challengers playoff finals and then gambit went on to win the series
big_chungus69 [#100]Fisker is so much better jett and entry than munchkin its insane. Ego igl
I mean Fisker is the Jett player, the coaches must've been cooking some shit.
redlight [#102]I mean Fisker is the Jett player, the coaches must've been cooking some shit.
Munchkin is way better on a more trade oriented duelist like Reyna, i think juggling IGLing with hard entry duties on raze/jett is too much for him. Fisker is a natural entry even from CS, even he was confused when he suddnrly had to play skye in their first game vs gambit
I'm now on the train of thought that, all teams are much closer in skill than we thought.
We've seen too many close calls with top teams and lesser teams. Not just this LAN either. If you have good reads on your opponent and you're not completely trash, you can have a close game.
Valorant could do with a wider skill gap.
ValorantLowSkillGame [#79]Is he their top player? Don't know much about the Asian scene
They have 3 KR players out of which only two could play. So they are benching based on maps probably.
yungbasel [#125]I'm now on the train of thought that, all teams are much closer in skill than we thought.
We've seen too many close calls with top teams and lesser teams. Not just this LAN either. If you have good reads on your opponent and you're not completely trash, you can have a close game.
Valorant could do with a wider skill gap.
but with cs?