naTs for 50 frags
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMB
|
0
|
4 (1)
|
2 (1)
|
2 (1)
|
18 (11)
|
CR
|
2
|
3 (2)
|
1 (0)
|
6 (3)
|
16 (7)
|
(BANK)
GMB
CR
(BANK)
|
1
0.3k
0.2k
|
2
6.9k
$$
2.9k
|
3
0.3k
$$$
$$$
4.1k
|
4
7.7k
$
$$$
9.8k
|
5
9.6k
$$$
$$
9.7k
|
6
2.3k
$$
$$$
14.4k
|
7
9.4k
$
$$$
13.1k
|
8
2.4k
$$$
$$$
25.6k
|
9
7.8k
$$
$$$
32.9k
|
10
11.6k
$$$
$$$
18.3k
|
11
18.7k
$$$
$$$
8.7k
|
12
22.4k
$$$
$$$
3.8k
|
(BANK)
GMB
CR
(BANK)
|
13
0.2k
0.1k
|
14
7.9k
$$
0.4k
|
15
9.3k
$$$
7.6k
|
16
22.0k
$$$
$$$
0.8k
|
17
25.5k
$$$
$
9.0k
|
18
30.7k
$$$
$$$
1.7k
|
19
17.3k
$$$
$$$
10.0k
|
20
10.7k
$$$
$$
4.0k
|
21
17.9k
$$$
$$
8.7k
|
22
24.9k
$$$
$$$
1.4k
|
23
12.0k
$$$
$$$
6.6k
|
24
12.4k
$$$
$$
0.5k
|
(BANK)
GMB
CR
(BANK)
|
25
1.8k
$$$
$$$
1.2k
|
26
1.8k
$$$
$$$
1.1k
|
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMB
|
1
|
3 (1)
|
0 (0)
|
4 (2)
|
14 (10)
|
CR
|
1
|
3 (1)
|
3 (0)
|
4 (2)
|
11 (5)
|
(BANK)
GMB
CR
(BANK)
|
1
0.5k
0.2k
|
2
8.9k
$$
1.7k
|
3
1.6k
$$$
$$
13.2k
|
4
8.2k
$$
$$$
14.2k
|
5
2.4k
$$$
$$$
15.0k
|
6
6.8k
$$
$$$
16.5k
|
7
0.6k
$$$
$$$
13.2k
|
8
9.2k
$$$
$$$
2.3k
|
9
15.9k
$$$
$
8.6k
|
10
17.1k
$$$
$$$
2.5k
|
11
5.7k
$$$
$$$
7.3k
|
12
9.5k
$$$
$$
0.5k
|
(BANK)
GMB
CR
(BANK)
|
13
0.3k
0.4k
|
14
1.5k
$$
9.7k
|
15
12.0k
$$
$$$
1.3k
|
16
6.6k
$$$
$
9.2k
|
17
19.0k
$$$
$$$
3.1k
|
18
12.3k
$$$
$$$
8.5k
|
19
16.7k
$$$
$
11.6k
|
20
24.9k
$$$
$$$
3.3k
|
21
24.5k
$$$
$$
0.5k
|
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMB
|
1
|
7 (2)
|
2 (1)
|
6 (3)
|
32 (21)
|
CR
|
3
|
6 (3)
|
4 (0)
|
10 (5)
|
27 (12)
|
raka_gg [#8]Gambit 2:0 surely?
This did not age well LOL. Steel played alright but his 5head plays were unmatched. Hiko clutched and also had massive impact. Please rethink your comment LOL
raka_gg [#8]Gambit 2:0 surely?
You do realize it says "edited" right? We can tell you said 100T instead of Gambit and you're just too shameless with no backbone.
sicktank [#15]GMB Gamblers gonna eat ramen for the rest of the Tourney XD
and nats provent to be a rat wannabe. XD. but GMB should win this one EZ. i mean who's gonna lose to HL? Slapping CR, and Winning HL to get to playoff is a n achievement to brag about XD.
sicktank [#17]and nats provent to be a rat wannabe. XD. but GMB should win this one EZ. i mean who's gonna lose to HL? Slapping CR, and Winning HL to get to playoff is a n achievement to brag about XD.
for #1 EMEA seed that is.
JettOnetap [#31]CR 2-0
Kinda scared of Gambit as 2nd seed so hope they choke and NA gets a free win against CR
Gambit could easily choke as they did with 100t, and even tho I like them, I'm actually scared of the, being 2nd seed cuz I think they can easily lose
I think CR will win somehow idk.
When they beat Havan one of the players looked in the camera and said "lets go gambit!" So I think they will be fired up. Also gambit will have all the pressure after their 100t Choke and CR will have none because they won their first series for thier region.
Also eu is trash.
zombs_fanboy [#50]I think CR will win somehow idk.
When they beat Havan one of the players looked in the camera and said "lets go gambit!" So I think they will be fired up. Also gambit will have all the pressure after their 100t Choke and CR will have none because they won their first series for thier region.
Also eu is trash.
zombs worse than gold 2s
Leytonnn [#5]Loser of the 100T GMB match will be here playing against Havan bc like Iceland CR won't win a match in Berlin
Personally I think it'll be GMB 2-0 Havan but it could also 100T 2-0 Havan
Or maybe gambit 0-2 CR
alice_ [#72]I noticed that CR was playing without medusa for the first match against Gambit. Lets see how much of a difference that makes.
Is he their top player? Don't know much about the Asian scene
idkwhoshouldisupport [#71]LOOKS LIKE HE'LL HAVE TO. LOL.
Don't forget SMB 13-1 gambit on Ascent 1st map in emea challengers playoff finals and then gambit went on to win the series
big_chungus69 [#100]Fisker is so much better jett and entry than munchkin its insane. Ego igl
I mean Fisker is the Jett player, the coaches must've been cooking some shit.
redlight [#102]I mean Fisker is the Jett player, the coaches must've been cooking some shit.
Munchkin is way better on a more trade oriented duelist like Reyna, i think juggling IGLing with hard entry duties on raze/jett is too much for him. Fisker is a natural entry even from CS, even he was confused when he suddnrly had to play skye in their first game vs gambit
I'm now on the train of thought that, all teams are much closer in skill than we thought.
We've seen too many close calls with top teams and lesser teams. Not just this LAN either. If you have good reads on your opponent and you're not completely trash, you can have a close game.
Valorant could do with a wider skill gap.
ValorantLowSkillGame [#79]Is he their top player? Don't know much about the Asian scene
They have 3 KR players out of which only two could play. So they are benching based on maps probably.
yungbasel [#125]I'm now on the train of thought that, all teams are much closer in skill than we thought.
We've seen too many close calls with top teams and lesser teams. Not just this LAN either. If you have good reads on your opponent and you're not completely trash, you can have a close game.
Valorant could do with a wider skill gap.
but with cs?