how much do you guys weigh winning champions vs winning masters
IMO winning champions is like worth 2 masters for me
Respectfully, it really didnt. First off, it was a single-elim. Look at the majority of masters and champs events, most of them including the previous two masters and champions had winners from the lower bracket. Get a lucky first few matchups and you’re on your way to the final. Second off, it was the first event of the year, these rosters are not gonna be close to the quality of teams after a full split / year
Lock in winners do not get absolutely any advantage for next tournament. Tourney is not seeded, there’s no double elim, this is literally mosts teams first official GAME together, you didn't even need to qualify to play in the event. This literally goes against everything a masters is. Lock in was a one time event to introduce franchising.
Difficulty wise there is zero difference. Still against the best teams in the world, still all of them trying their absolute hardest. You could even argue masters is harder since a team can be amazing at the start of the year and rack up lots of points but then fall off hard at the end of the year when champs rolls around with all the different meta shifts. These teams will qualify but will be worse than the teams that had a slow start but peaked later in the year who just missed the points needed. Masters you are against the best teams in the world at that point in time and there is zero fall off.