G2 - Gambit
Gambit 2-1 G2
oh its bo5 3-2 Gambit
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 1.25 1.22 | 249 264 234 | 30 15 15 | / 24 14 10 / | 6 4 2 | +6 +1 +5 | 82% 65% 100% | 162 175 150 | 28% 40% 12% | 6 2 4 | 4 3 1 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
1.17 0.43 1.91 | 196 90 303 | 27 5 22 | / 22 15 7 / | 3 2 1 | +5 -10 +15 | 65% 47% 82% | 124 69 179 | 41% 69% 32% | 1 1 0 | 2 2 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.91 0.75 1.07 | 187 173 201 | 22 11 11 | / 26 15 11 / | 10 2 8 | -4 -4 0 | 79% 65% 94% | 140 130 150 | 38% 31% 44% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.73 0.36 1.11 | 195 133 258 | 21 6 15 | / 27 16 11 / | 7 4 3 | -6 -10 +4 | 53% 35% 71% | 139 110 168 | 15% 13% 16% | 3 0 3 | 7 6 1 | -4 -6 +2 | |
|
0.69 0.28 1.09 | 141 78 205 | 17 6 11 | / 25 15 10 / | 10 2 8 | -8 -9 +1 | 74% 59% 88% | 84 54 114 | 45% 42% 46% | 3 1 2 | 5 1 4 | -2 0 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.37 0.94 1.81 | 270 232 308 | 30 12 18 | / 22 15 7 / | 3 3 0 | +8 -3 +11 | 85% 82% 88% | 174 145 203 | 35% 29% 40% | 6 2 4 | 3 3 0 | +3 -1 +4 | |
|
1.00 1.07 0.93 | 188 253 125 | 23 15 8 | / 23 15 8 / | 14 7 7 | 0 0 0 | 82% 94% 71% | 123 149 96 | 11% 16% 6% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.00 0.56 1.44 | 200 146 256 | 25 10 15 | / 22 14 8 / | 6 2 4 | +3 -4 +7 | 68% 47% 88% | 139 89 189 | 34% 19% 46% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 | |
|
0.95 0.54 1.35 | 192 122 263 | 23 7 16 | / 23 14 9 / | 13 6 7 | 0 -7 +7 | 68% 47% 88% | 110 55 164 | 11% 4% 13% | 6 3 3 | 2 0 2 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
0.77 0.22 1.32 | 184 113 256 | 23 6 17 | / 27 17 10 / | 6 3 3 | -4 -11 +7 | 62% 53% 71% | 119 68 169 | 33% 24% 40% | 6 2 4 | 7 5 2 | -1 -3 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.43 0.86 1.19 | 242 296 182 | 81 55 26 | / 67 37 30 / | 12 8 4 | +14 +18 -4 | 70% 66% 75% | 156 189 113 | 25% 29% 15% | 15 7 8 | 11 7 4 | +4 0 +4 | |
|
0.86 1.14 0.98 | 178 179 187 | 61 34 27 | / 66 41 25 / | 17 9 8 | -5 -7 +2 | 63% 60% 68% | 118 117 121 | 25% 27% 23% | 4 4 0 | 9 7 2 | -5 -3 -2 | |
|
0.74 0.88 0.80 | 183 161 217 | 56 29 27 | / 68 38 30 / | 16 9 7 | -12 -9 -3 | 56% 53% 60% | 118 113 123 | 20% 19% 20% | 7 2 5 | 14 12 2 | -7 -10 +3 | |
|
0.50 1.21 0.80 | 169 105 263 | 59 21 38 | / 71 42 29 / | 17 5 12 | -12 -21 +9 | 66% 55% 80% | 111 76 157 | 36% 30% 41% | 5 1 4 | 7 4 3 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.62 0.84 0.71 | 175 157 190 | 53 30 23 | / 73 43 30 / | 27 13 14 | -20 -13 -7 | 65% 64% 65% | 103 99 107 | 47% 48% 45% | 8 5 3 | 13 4 9 | -5 +1 -6 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.06 1.39 1.25 | 238 208 264 | 77 29 48 | / 56 27 29 / | 11 7 4 | +21 +2 +19 | 75% 78% 74% | 154 129 173 | 31% 34% 29% | 10 4 6 | 6 4 2 | +4 0 +4 | |
|
0.85 1.22 1.06 | 213 184 221 | 72 27 45 | / 60 30 30 / | 24 11 13 | +12 -3 +15 | 71% 63% 77% | 125 104 141 | 26% 29% 24% | 14 6 8 | 7 2 5 | +7 +4 +3 | |
|
0.95 1.14 1.06 | 233 205 235 | 76 30 46 | / 64 29 35 / | 16 8 8 | +12 +1 +11 | 65% 65% 64% | 127 108 142 | 27% 27% 27% | 13 3 10 | 14 8 6 | -1 -5 +4 | |
|
1.08 0.99 1.03 | 213 230 204 | 71 36 35 | / 65 29 36 / | 22 6 16 | +6 +7 -1 | 70% 68% 72% | 139 133 143 | 33% 30% 35% | 12 6 6 | 5 2 3 | +7 +4 +3 | |
|
0.74 0.82 0.79 | 155 174 148 | 49 23 26 | / 65 31 34 / | 29 12 17 | -16 -8 -8 | 72% 78% 68% | 106 106 106 | 16% 18% 14% | 5 1 4 | 7 4 3 | -2 -3 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.74 0.72 0.79 | 211 202 233 | 10 7 3 | / 15 11 4 / | 1 0 1 | -5 -4 -1 | 53% 50% 60% | 120 127 104 | 20% 19% 25% | 1 1 0 | 4 4 0 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.59 0.55 0.68 | 171 157 209 | 10 7 3 | / 16 11 5 / | 2 2 0 | -6 -4 -2 | 59% 58% 60% | 99 98 101 | 57% 50% 75% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.58 0.58 0.58 | 124 108 166 | 7 4 3 | / 14 10 4 / | 3 2 1 | -7 -6 -1 | 47% 42% 60% | 70 79 48 | 17% 27% 0% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.52 0.25 1.15 | 145 91 277 | 9 4 5 | / 15 11 4 / | 2 1 1 | -6 -7 +1 | 53% 50% 60% | 88 61 154 | 38% 33% 44% | 1 0 1 | 3 3 0 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.51 0.69 0.06 | 147 181 68 | 7 7 0 | / 16 11 5 / | 3 1 2 | -9 -4 -5 | 59% 58% 60% | 105 121 68 | 19% 23% 8% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.75 1.87 1.70 | 295 333 280 | 19 6 13 | / 7 3 4 / | 6 2 4 | +12 +3 +9 | 94% 100% 92% | 186 177 189 | 34% 41% 30% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.59 0.21 2.16 | 300 47 406 | 20 1 19 | / 9 4 5 / | 4 2 2 | +11 -3 +14 | 88% 60% 100% | 193 32 260 | 41% 100% 39% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
1.58 1.85 1.47 | 331 419 294 | 20 8 12 | / 8 3 5 / | 5 0 5 | +12 +5 +7 | 82% 80% 83% | 161 158 162 | 21% 20% 22% | 4 0 4 | 2 1 1 | +2 -1 +3 | |
|
0.96 0.84 1.00 | 162 162 162 | 9 3 6 | / 8 3 5 / | 4 1 3 | +1 0 +1 | 88% 80% 92% | 120 100 128 | 39% 67% 29% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.77 1.29 0.55 | 138 186 118 | 8 4 4 | / 11 3 8 / | 7 1 6 | -3 +1 -4 | 65% 80% 58% | 90 113 80 | 31% 17% 43% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.19 1.54 0.76 | 196 220 169 | 15 11 4 | / 10 2 8 / | 4 3 1 | +5 +9 -4 | 68% 83% 50% | 130 159 95 | 30% 35% 21% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.16 1.75 0.45 | 239 330 130 | 19 15 4 | / 14 4 10 / | 2 2 0 | +5 +11 -6 | 73% 92% 50% | 157 212 91 | 28% 24% 43% | 4 3 1 | 1 0 1 | +3 +3 0 | |
|
1.15 1.38 0.87 | 204 237 165 | 15 12 3 | / 13 5 8 / | 7 5 2 | +2 +7 -5 | 73% 83% 60% | 129 139 117 | 14% 16% 11% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
1.04 1.58 0.39 | 235 323 130 | 17 14 3 | / 15 6 9 / | 8 5 3 | +2 +8 -6 | 68% 100% 30% | 147 195 91 | 60% 67% 43% | 3 3 0 | 4 0 4 | -1 +3 -4 | |
|
0.88 0.74 1.05 | 173 97 266 | 16 5 11 | / 15 6 9 / | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | 73% 75% 70% | 91 62 126 | 29% 24% 33% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.39 2.20 0.72 | 281 409 176 | 22 16 6 | / 16 5 11 / | 4 3 1 | +6 +11 -5 | 64% 90% 42% | 176 249 114 | 27% 32% 19% | 5 4 1 | 1 0 1 | +4 +4 0 | |
|
0.95 1.21 0.74 | 204 215 195 | 16 8 8 | / 17 5 12 / | 4 4 0 | -1 +3 -4 | 59% 80% 42% | 118 130 109 | 24% 28% 22% | 1 1 0 | 3 1 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.85 1.60 0.22 | 156 276 57 | 12 11 1 | / 14 4 10 / | 2 1 1 | -2 +7 -9 | 55% 90% 25% | 95 154 46 | 22% 29% 11% | 3 2 1 | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.48 0.50 0.47 | 110 129 94 | 9 5 4 | / 17 7 10 / | 5 3 2 | -8 -2 -6 | 59% 70% 50% | 83 93 75 | 30% 32% 27% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |
|
0.46 0.65 0.30 | 116 126 109 | 8 4 4 | / 18 6 12 / | 4 3 1 | -10 -2 -8 | 55% 80% 33% | 71 67 74 | 21% 7% 44% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.66 2.23 0.81 | 355 494 148 | 25 21 4 | / 15 9 6 / | 1 0 1 | +10 +12 -2 | 65% 67% 63% | 219 297 102 | 22% 24% 18% | 4 2 2 | 4 3 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.87 1.10 0.53 | 163 245 42 | 12 10 2 | / 15 10 5 / | 4 1 3 | -3 0 -3 | 55% 58% 50% | 108 157 35 | 29% 25% 67% | 1 1 0 | 3 3 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.77 0.13 1.74 | 171 31 384 | 12 1 11 | / 15 10 5 / | 4 1 3 | -3 -9 +6 | 45% 25% 75% | 101 27 211 | 41% 40% 41% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.54 0.51 0.59 | 131 100 180 | 10 5 5 | / 16 9 7 / | 4 2 2 | -6 -4 -2 | 50% 50% 50% | 66 58 77 | 21% 13% 33% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.51 0.22 0.94 | 151 104 222 | 9 3 6 | / 17 11 6 / | 7 4 3 | -8 -8 0 | 50% 42% 63% | 88 70 116 | 32% 25% 38% | 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 | -3 -2 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.30 1.30 1.30 | 253 290 228 | 21 9 12 | / 13 6 7 / | 0 0 0 | +8 +3 +5 | 70% 63% 75% | 147 177 127 | 50% 53% 48% | 4 1 3 | 3 2 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.22 1.59 0.98 | 212 253 185 | 17 8 9 | / 12 4 8 / | 1 1 0 | +5 +4 +1 | 60% 63% 58% | 124 134 117 | 34% 40% 29% | 2 0 2 | 2 1 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
1.18 1.19 1.17 | 227 173 264 | 15 5 10 | / 11 4 7 / | 2 1 1 | +4 +1 +3 | 70% 63% 75% | 153 126 171 | 26% 53% 15% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.89 0.64 1.05 | 231 214 243 | 16 6 10 | / 16 7 9 / | 5 0 5 | 0 -1 +1 | 85% 75% 92% | 139 92 170 | 43% 86% 32% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.64 0.11 1.00 | 153 74 206 | 9 1 8 | / 16 7 9 / | 7 1 6 | -7 -6 -1 | 60% 38% 75% | 107 69 132 | 10% 14% 9% | 2 0 2 | 2 2 0 | 0 -2 +2 |
PR3D1CTOR [#1]G2 - Gambit
Gambit 2-1 G2
oh its bo5 3-2 Gambit
This is going to 5 maps unless someone has a bad day
MilanTheMyth [#38]It's 2069, I have had 3 kids, I'm still watching Acend VS Gambit. My wife left me, cNed keeps buying Operator. nAts keeps clutching out. Sheydos is on 8894 kills, BONECOLD has retired and his son plays for him now.
copy pasta twitch chat
thighlove [#34]bo5
i know its bo 5 but acend banned one map so they could ban ascent or split and they banned split
samoangoat [#45]ACE 3-1 Gambit, wp to both teams, but I think gambit is not too strong in some maps like split or icebox
Acend looked kinda bad on Split yesterday
Sims4proplayer [#46]just looking on map pick should be Acend match unfortunately
Gambit havent play alot of Breeze and they havent played Haven like forever
breeze is their pick?
Sims4proplayer [#49]yes thats why haven is last map
gambit picked breeze as 3rd map and haven is 4th?
WitLitning [#60]first i like how EU teams don’t blatantly throw seeding matches like TSM and NA.
also this cned guy isn’t doing so well today, at least in comparison to the praise he gets from his supporters.
did u even see the first map he was popping off.
samoangoat [#45]ACE 3-1 Gambit, wp to both teams, but I think gambit is not too strong in some maps like split or icebox
Welp now needs to be 3-2
Liquid_fan [#62]if Gambit wins in Berlin so TL qualify directly to champions
Lets go Gambit
Thats it, GAMBIT TO GRAND FINALS
BARRYALLEN [#66]3-2 acend already xD
If Gambit wins berlin by getting better seed from winning against ACEND then Liquid directly go to champions. Full on copium
Jai [#63]did u even see the first map he was popping off.
yeah i watched ascent. he whiffed some peculiar shots too.
MilanTheMyth [#68]If Gambit wins berlin by getting better seed from winning against ACEND then Liquid directly go to champions. Full on copium
Liquid are already confirmed for LCQ no? If there was a chance (Such as gambit winning Berlin) that they make it to Champions automatically, they wouldn’t auto be in LCQ would they?
NETERO_HYPEMAN [#76]KEKW Cned only good player in entire EU region, once he chokes on LAN no hope for EU frogs
Finally a good take from official netero hypeman
no way this soyboy seedned drops over 20 kills per map in berlin
NA cruising to finals
raka_gg [#73]ACEND losing 4v1 against a random CIS team and they are supposed to beat sentinels, envy, and 100T? HAHAHAHA
NA will have a cakewalk path to playoffs in Berlin
I only regret that there are no 4 slots for NA so we could have SEN ENVY 100T TSM in semis and watch some good valorante
Lmao TSM
NETERO_HYPEMAN [#76]KEKW Cned only good player in entire EU region, once he chokes on LAN no hope for EU frogs
jett abuser already getting destroyed on EMEA playoffs, SEN will make him look like a gold player lmao
coguyy [#80]jett abuser already getting destroyed on EMEA playoffs, SEN will make him look like a gold player lmao
jett abuser lmao tf does even that mean
raka_gg [#73]ACEND losing 4v1 against a random CIS team and they are supposed to beat sentinels, envy, and 100T? HAHAHAHA
NA will have a cakewalk path to playoffs in Berlin
I only regret that there are no 4 slots for NA so we could have SEN ENVY 100T TSM in semis and watch some good valorante
TSM wouldnt have made it to berlin even if there were 4 slots for NA wdym?
raka_gg [#73]ACEND losing 4v1 against a random CIS team and they are supposed to beat sentinels, envy, and 100T? HAHAHAHA
NA will have a cakewalk path to playoffs in Berlin
I only regret that there are no 4 slots for NA so we could have SEN ENVY 100T TSM in semis and watch some good valorante
tsm sucks
SharubuNguvu [#86]Gambit literally playing a troll haven comp and winning wtf. Redgar on reyna???, the worst aimer on this team and they still took acend down.
WP by GAMBIT.
That was actually bait all the time. They never play haven because its their best map and Redgar is their best aimer. The deception
pikachu [#88]cNed died = Acend lost
died? cNed, only plus is the one in kda. clutch ace .. not enough. Kiles and Bonecold are in serious decline
raka_gg [#73]ACEND losing 4v1 against a random CIS team and they are supposed to beat sentinels, envy, and 100T? HAHAHAHA
NA will have a cakewalk path to playoffs in Berlin
I only regret that there are no 4 slots for NA so we could have SEN ENVY 100T TSM in semis and watch some good valorante
This NA dogs crying, ur gonna get destroyed by all emea, not that fnatic and liquid shit. SMB on LAN best fire power will make SEN look like 5 bonkars, not even a chance for 100T and Envy, 2 T2 teams like all NA except SEN
Adri07_ [#104]This NA dogs crying, ur gonna get destroyed by all emea, not that fnatic and liquid shit. SMB on LAN best fire power will make SEN look like 5 bonkars, not even a chance for 100T and Envy, 2 T2 teams like all NA except SEN
now say that without crying
SharubuNguvu [#86]Gambit literally playing a troll haven comp and winning wtf. Redgar on reyna???, the worst aimer on this team and they still took acend down.
WP by GAMBIT.
50% hs on reyna, worst aimer? wdym?
tronze [#107]50% hs on reyna, worst aimer? wdym?
Ну так он реально самый хуевый аимер в этой команде, потому что ему надо много говорить как ИГЛу плюс он играет на смоках, смокеры обычно не дают много фрагов.
Itsover [#108]Ну так он реально самый хуевый аимер в этой команде, потому что ему надо много говорить как ИГЛу плюс он играет на смоках, смокеры обычно не дают много фрагов.
Я бы не сказал, что он прям хуевый, просто если смотреть на статистику, то да, мало фрагов=плохо стреляет. Только вот это не так, сапорты банально имеют меньше дуэлей за матч чем кто либо ещё, ТК в идеале до них вообще не доходит очередь выходить в размен. Плюс когда ты останешься в меньшинстве, потому что твоего энтри забрали, автоматически становится сложнее найти какой-то фраг. Так-то Редгар все время ставил по головам хорошо, давно слежу за гамбит.
tronze [#107]50% hs on reyna, worst aimer? wdym?
Nats, deffo, sheydos and cheronicle definitley have better aim than him.
Also according to redgar post match interview and chronicle tweet, the redgar reyna was literally a troll pick and they didn't expect to win haven but somehow they did
Sims4proplayer [#110]Я бы не сказал, что он прям хуевый, просто если смотреть на статистику, то да, мало фрагов=плохо стреляет. Только вот это не так, сапорты банально имеют меньше дуэлей за матч чем кто либо ещё, ТК в идеале до них вообще не доходит очередь выходить в размен. Плюс когда ты останешься в меньшинстве, потому что твоего энтри забрали, автоматически становится сложнее найти какой-то фраг. Так-то Редгар все время ставил по головам хорошо, давно слежу за гамбит.
Коллить+стрелять в любом шутере могут единицы и редгар не из них, офк если он будет просто игроком а не коллером он будет настреливать, у него мозги работают с большим количеством задач чем у его тиммейтов, поэтому он проседает по аиму иногда, посади натса или шейдоса коллить и они точно так же упадут в плане индивидуальной игры, никто не говорит что редгар плохо играет
SharubuNguvu [#111]Nats, deffo, sheydos and cheronicle definitley have better aim than him.
Also according to redgar post match interview and chronicle tweet, the redgar reyna was literally a troll pick and they didn't expect to win haven but somehow they did
Im watching every gambit game. Redgar actually not that bad aimer everyone claiming him be. He often gets those crispy headshots when he got a chance. Even gambit vs tl game he won not only 1v1 clutch against scream but couple more 1v1 duels against him. And scream is arguably one of the best aimers in the world.
It is just Redgar being support player he have much less aim duels than entry fraggers, lurkers or even anchors. And on top of that he is IGL and thats certainly take away some focus from just crosshair
CristanchOx [#102]sheydos a total machine
dude acend just gave him 1v1 after 1v1 most of his and nat's clutches were just due to acend's really shity peek timings and positioning . Teams like vison strikers , 100 thieves and sentinels would win most of the rounds sheydos clutched out just by the factor of better timing
vollizie [#120]God dammit they deleted the vod
VODS available in the VCT youtube's Berlin playlist : https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMJ9cfx_WDdzEiwG1GgE4YQWw0m3yQDiw