Georggyyy vs. Patiphan sana, sayang
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.61 1.72 1.52 | 303 356 265 | 21 11 10 | / 10 5 5 / | 11 8 3 | +11 +6 +5 | 86% 89% 83% | 173 173 173 | 22% 32% 15% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.41 0.80 1.87 | 324 219 404 | 25 7 18 | / 13 7 6 / | 3 2 1 | +12 0 +12 | 62% 56% 67% | 180 99 240 | 8% 9% 8% | 5 2 3 | 4 2 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.20 1.02 1.34 | 236 258 221 | 14 6 8 | / 12 7 5 / | 11 7 4 | +2 -1 +3 | 76% 78% 75% | 171 152 185 | 22% 22% 22% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.94 0.99 0.91 | 153 184 130 | 12 7 5 | / 13 6 7 / | 9 4 5 | -1 +1 -2 | 76% 78% 75% | 99 95 101 | 14% 18% 11% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.70 0.89 0.57 | 111 110 114 | 8 4 4 | / 14 5 9 / | 5 2 3 | -6 -1 -5 | 67% 78% 58% | 71 52 85 | 17% 13% 19% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.21 1.32 1.06 | 241 243 239 | 18 10 8 | / 15 8 7 / | 6 5 1 | +3 +2 +1 | 71% 67% 78% | 139 149 125 | 32% 31% 33% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.11 0.82 1.50 | 207 183 239 | 16 8 8 | / 16 10 6 / | 3 1 2 | 0 -2 +2 | 52% 42% 67% | 127 106 155 | 39% 21% 71% | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
0.86 0.93 0.76 | 157 148 171 | 9 5 4 | / 14 8 6 / | 10 6 4 | -5 -3 -2 | 71% 67% 78% | 114 114 114 | 27% 33% 22% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.52 0.45 0.61 | 135 89 197 | 9 3 6 | / 16 9 7 / | 3 3 0 | -7 -6 -1 | 57% 50% 67% | 86 68 110 | 20% 12% 28% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.48 0.46 0.51 | 139 134 147 | 9 5 4 | / 19 10 9 / | 1 0 1 | -10 -5 -5 | 48% 50% 44% | 88 84 92 | 10% 33% 0% | 1 1 0 | 5 5 0 | -4 -4 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.72 1.52 1.61 | 303 356 265 | 21 11 10 | / 10 5 5 / | 11 8 3 | +11 +6 +5 | 86% 89% 83% | 173 173 173 | 22% 32% 15% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
0.80 1.87 1.41 | 324 219 404 | 25 7 18 | / 13 7 6 / | 3 2 1 | +12 0 +12 | 62% 56% 67% | 180 99 240 | 8% 9% 8% | 5 2 3 | 4 2 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.02 1.34 1.20 | 236 258 221 | 14 6 8 | / 12 7 5 / | 11 7 4 | +2 -1 +3 | 76% 78% 75% | 171 152 185 | 22% 22% 22% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.99 0.91 0.94 | 153 184 130 | 12 7 5 | / 13 6 7 / | 9 4 5 | -1 +1 -2 | 76% 78% 75% | 99 95 101 | 14% 18% 11% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.89 0.57 0.70 | 111 110 114 | 8 4 4 | / 14 5 9 / | 5 2 3 | -6 -1 -5 | 67% 78% 58% | 71 52 85 | 17% 13% 19% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.32 1.06 1.21 | 241 243 239 | 18 10 8 | / 15 8 7 / | 6 5 1 | +3 +2 +1 | 71% 67% 78% | 139 149 125 | 32% 31% 33% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.82 1.50 1.11 | 207 183 239 | 16 8 8 | / 16 10 6 / | 3 1 2 | 0 -2 +2 | 52% 42% 67% | 127 106 155 | 39% 21% 71% | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
0.93 0.76 0.86 | 157 148 171 | 9 5 4 | / 14 8 6 / | 10 6 4 | -5 -3 -2 | 71% 67% 78% | 114 114 114 | 27% 33% 22% | 1 0 1 | 2 0 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.45 0.61 0.52 | 135 89 197 | 9 3 6 | / 16 9 7 / | 3 3 0 | -7 -6 -1 | 57% 50% 67% | 86 68 110 | 20% 12% 28% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.46 0.51 0.48 | 139 134 147 | 9 5 4 | / 19 10 9 / | 1 0 1 | -10 -5 -5 | 48% 50% 44% | 88 84 92 | 10% 33% 0% | 1 1 0 | 5 5 0 | -4 -4 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / |
It still doesn't justify the usage of that cam tho, I mean like Giants case, it was not included as a known exploit in the EU rulebook first, but they still got penelized later. Despite this, X10 still chose to do so. They can't just claim it was absent in the SEA rulebook and not expect consequences
Alright. First of all, it's tournament organizers. Not production. They're completely separate entities under one umbrella. Second of all, it might be true if this was Challengers Philippines as they have the higher authority to decide besides the Riot global rules. But no, it's the SEA Challengers Playoffs which while managed and organized by PPGL, it is in conjunction with Riot and their global rules as it is the overarching entity.