good player
Shawn23 [#3]good, Tier 1 ready ? no.
tbh we don't know that yet the only way to find out is by trailing out with t1 teams
Shawn23 [#3]good, Tier 1 ready ? no.
if shahzam/vanity/screwface (sry kyle) are all getting a trial, meL should get one too
v1 midrounding looked amazing even when they are getting railed by a no namers on tier 3
when yay loses 8 times in a row vs tier 2 - "its a 5v5 team game, not his fault"
when melanji loses to girl kissers - "lol she sucks she dont deserve tier1 she aint rdy"
babysasuke [#2]if Valorant wasnt sexist she would be on C9 next year
if Valorant wasnt richist babybay would have an offer on every team next year
ShanksFan69 [#4]tbh we don't know that yet the only way to find out is by trailing out with t1 teams
yeah teams should go trial my high school valorants team IGL too.
she hasn’t earned a trial for a tier 1 team, yeah she’s dominated Gamechangers , but 70% of game changers are plat - low imm players , she needs actual results vs Tier 2/Co-Ed teams and when she plays vs them she gets first/second rounded in knights monthly bro, it takes a lot to be a IGL then be a non igl.
alecksdesk [#5]if shahzam/vanity/screwface (sry kyle) are all getting a trial, meL should get one too
v1 midrounding looked amazing even when they are getting railed by a no namers on tier 3
when yay loses 8 times in a row vs tier 2 - "its a 5v5 team game, not his fault"
when melanji loses to girl kissers - "lol she sucks she dont deserve tier1 she aint rdy"
girl kissers
alecksdesk [#6]if Valorant wasnt richist babybay would have an offer on every team next year
That's what I'm sayin 😞 All good, if all else fails he just runs through Ascension next year like its nothing
Light work for the GOAT
babysasuke [#2]if Valorant wasnt sexist she would be on C9 next year
being on C9 is not an accomplishment these days
CryoZanderDerrekEnjoyer [#12]being on C9 is not an accomplishment these days
being on lulquid was never an accomplishment
CryoZanderDerrekEnjoyer [#12]being on C9 is not an accomplishment these days
I sincerely apologize if I insinuated that it was
Fraud bankrupt scumbag org and overrated honeymoon team
Shawn23 [#7]yeah teams should go trial my high school valorants team IGL too.
she hasn’t earned a trial for a tier 1 team, yeah she’s dominated Gamechangers , but 70% of game changers are plat - low imm players , she needs actual results vs Tier 2/Co-Ed teams and when she plays vs them she gets first/second rounded in knights monthly bro, it takes a lot to be a IGL then be a non igl.
what are the requirements for earning a trial for a tier 1 team in your opinion?
StutterSt3p [#10]Actual W igl, hope she gets into t2/t1 one day.
as an IGL, she is better than some of the t1 players in americas
people will see it when flor and mel dominate their way into challengers next year zzz
Shawn23 [#3]good, Tier 1 ready ? no.
she needs to prove herself in t2 igling atleast, especially because she got diffed by some bottom t2 teams
babysasuke [#14]I sincerely apologize if I insinuated that it was
Fraud bankrupt scumbag org and overrated honeymoon team
nooo cappaaaa
Nachtel [#15]what are the requirements for earning a trial for a tier 1 team in your opinion?
She needs to go co-ed or tier 2, you can’t stay in gamechangers your whole playing time and expect to get a shot at tier 1, it won’t happen, not for a single player.
Once she goes tier 2/co-ed with good players and dominate people will see and actually recognize her, she didn’t even even GC champs….. while it’s obviously a team difference on why she loses vs Tier 3 teams she needs to join one of them and actually lead a team at that level. not a gamechangers team that’s holding her back.
alecksdesk [#5]if shahzam/vanity/screwface (sry kyle) are all getting a trial, meL should get one too
v1 midrounding looked amazing even when they are getting railed by a no namers on tier 3
when yay loses 8 times in a row vs tier 2 - "its a 5v5 team game, not his fault"
when melanji loses to girl kissers - "lol she sucks she dont deserve tier1 she aint rdy"
diff is mechanically those players you mentioned are no way the same as meL
may she be on par or higher than them in terms of pure IGLing skills? maybe. should teams at least give her a look? maybe.
is it fair for teams to not offer a trial because they think she isn’t good enough? yes that’s up to individual orgs and management
is it fair for her to be discriminated just cause if her gender if she deserves it? hell fucking no
alecksdesk [#16]as an IGL, she is better than some of the t1 players in americas
people will see it when flor and mel dominate their way into challengers next year zzz
name me the igls u think she is better then. mainly NA. idk any latam or BR igls (and that's on me) but only 2 maybe 3 igls in on par with her all are better and clear her
nematoma [#21]i think the best way for mel to prove these people wrong would be to make a mixed tier 2 team and just grind it into franchising. that would cement her igl skills and prove people wrong that she crumbles under pressure too
if she does it she cant compete in gc and its a risk for her
whats wrong with getting a trial?
Shawn23 [#19]She needs to go co-ed or tier 2, you can’t stay in gamechangers your whole playing time and expect to get a shot at tier 1, it won’t happen, not for a single player.
Once she goes tier 2/co-ed with good players and dominate people will see and actually recognize her, she didn’t even even GC champs….. while it’s obviously a team difference on why she loses vs Tier 3 teams she needs to join one of them and actually lead a team at that level. not a gamechangers team that’s holding her back.
but NOOO she needs to TRIAAAL if given the chance she might be the best player in the world? with the right support and structure of t1 orgs the moon is the limit
alecksdesk [#23]if she does it she cant compete in gc and its a risk for her
whats wrong with getting a trial?
so you are saying she DESERVES a trial despite doing nothing in a modestly NA GC scene and being on a 'super team' for the past 2 years and then LOSING in GC championship to a G2 side that went on to win the whole thing. and when they do play in co-ed competitions they dont often make it past second round most of the time
compared to people at T2? you dont think she needs to climb up the ranks like everyone else prove herself at a higher level? she should just jump queue?
balax [#25]so you are saying she DESERVES a trial despite doing nothing in a modestly NA GC scene and being on a 'super team' for the past 2 years and then LOSING in GC championship to a G2 side that went on to win the whole thing. and when they do play in co-ed competitions they dont often make it past second round most of the time
compared to people at T2? you dont think she needs to climb up the ranks like everyone else prove herself at a higher level? she should just jump queue?
shes a great igl if u actually watch the games and not just the result on vlr after lol
balax [#22]name me the igls u think she is better then. mainly NA. idk any latam or BR igls (and that's on me) but only 2 maybe 3 igls in on par with her all are better and clear her
screwface shahzam vanity xand murizzz k1nggg (better igl, not a better fragger. this guy is top 10 NA)
alecksdesk [#26]shes a great igl if u actually watch the games and not just the result on vlr after lol
I do watch the games and you didnt answer my question. you think she gets to skip queue because of her games in a tier of competition that isn't as high as t1. and who do you think she could and should replace as an igl in that case? I can think of maybe 2 to 3. 4 if I'm being reallllly picky
furthermore there are a lot of teams that we do not know who will be their igl so I'll just go of the 2023 roster
semicute_eboy [#24]but NOOO she needs to TRIAAAL if given the chance she might be the best player in the world? with the right support and structure of t1 orgs the moon is the limit
only a team that plans to lose and dosent plan to win this year would do that, i think with time in a T1 she could but wouldnt be year one, maybe year two or three, but teams Want to win NOW, not wait a year.
balax [#28]I do watch the games and you didnt answer my question. you think she gets to skip queue because of her games in a tier of competition that isn't as high as t1. and who do you think she could and should replace as an igl in that case? I can think of maybe 2 to 3. 4 if I'm being reallllly picky
furthermore there are a lot of teams that we do not know who will be their igl so I'll just go of the 2023 roster
i think shes a lot better than tier 1 players and the igl market is really underwhelming rn for every region
u are telling me she aint better than most apac/EMEA igls?
alecksdesk [#33]i think shes a lot better than tier 1 players and the igl market is really underwhelming rn for every region
u are telling me she aint better than most apac/EMEA igls?
idk. I'm not her maybe she wants to switch regions but that's not the point. I'm talking NA here and better than a lot of t1 players is stretching it.
I rly can't think of people that teams would drop for her. I'm not talking abt the latam or BR teams. idk what they think like.
Shawn23 [#31]only a team that plans to lose and dosent plan to win this year would do that, i think with time in a T1 she could but wouldnt be year one, maybe year two or three, but teams Want to win NOW, not wait a year.
ya thats my point she is a good igl for sure but not t1 material , she should play t2 and grow as a player and igl before trying to trial for the best of the best also why do ppl take whatever slasher says as the truth when he himself is nothing but a clickbait , shit stirring joke of a "journalist" who has a shady history and is a creep
balax [#34]idk. I'm not her maybe she wants to switch regions but that's not the point. I'm talking NA here and better than a lot of t1 players is stretching it.
I rly can't think of people that teams would drop for her. I'm not talking abt the latam or BR teams. idk what they think like.
i think if shahzam/screwface/vanity are getting a trial, i dont see why she wont
and if any players are saying "i dont feel comfy playing with a girl on my team" then thats fucked, and thats all slasher was saying.
the argument if she is tier 1 or not should stay aside, the real problem is the players being openly sexist behind closed doors.
h786 [#30]if i speak...
you can speak, its a public forum and id like to get your opinion
im all for discussion
alecksdesk [#38]you can speak, its a public forum and id like to get your opinion
im all for discussion
all i got to say to you is take whatever shit the 30 + something creep tweets out with a HUGE grain of salt , he is nothing but a clickbaiter who wants to stay relevant
crashhacker1 [#32]gets rejected
uses her gender instead of her skill as a reason
as the others have said, IF I SPEAK
you do realize she didn't bring this up and hasn't posted about it a single time right
semicute_eboy [#39]all i got to say to you is take whatever shit the 30 + something creep tweets out with a HUGE grain of salt , he is nothing but a clickbaiter who wants to stay relevant
hes been reliable when leaking other shit, and as far as my sources told me - the aspas thing WAS true at that time, and as you can see he isn't staying on loud.
slasher was a really reliable leaker back in the OWL days, so i still trust him.
alecksdesk [#41]hes been reliable when leaking other shit, and as far as my sources told me - the aspas thing WAS true at that time, and as you can see he isn't staying on loud.
slasher was a really reliable leaker back in the OWL days, so i still trust him.
he also drama baited the dr.d situation with a (trust me bros i cannot speak the truth) and the entire britt situation making him seem like a fucking creep
semicute_eboy [#42]he also drama baited the dr.d situation with a (trust me bros i cannot speak the truth) and the entire britt situation making him seem like a fucking creep
well i dont know about that bc i dont really follow mainstream streamers/keemshit drama alert
i just know he leaked a bunch of shit for OWL and was pretty accruate back then, and that the aspas thing was true so it does check out