fpx clear
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
293 | 23 | / 13 / | 3 | +10 | ||||||||
|
232 | 16 | / 12 / | 10 | +4 | ||||||||
|
219 | 17 | / 10 / | 8 | +7 | ||||||||
|
202 | 16 | / 15 / | 3 | +1 | ||||||||
|
132 | 9 | / 14 / | 7 | -5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
256 | 21 | / 14 / | 9 | +7 | ||||||||
|
201 | 16 | / 15 / | 10 | +1 | ||||||||
|
195 | 13 | / 17 / | 3 | -4 | ||||||||
|
171 | 10 | / 16 / | 9 | -6 | ||||||||
|
80 | 4 | / 19 / | 3 | -15 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
272 | 64 | / 44 / | 9 | +20 | ||||||||
|
227 | 53 | / 47 / | 26 | +6 | ||||||||
|
222 | 53 | / 40 / | 28 | +13 | ||||||||
|
201 | 45 | / 45 / | 13 | 0 | ||||||||
|
140 | 29 | / 47 / | 31 | -18 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
240 | 59 | / 45 / | 28 | +14 | ||||||||
|
239 | 50 | / 52 / | 22 | -2 | ||||||||
|
181 | 39 | / 49 / | 15 | -10 | ||||||||
|
179 | 42 | / 51 / | 23 | -9 | ||||||||
|
152 | 33 | / 47 / | 24 | -14 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
290 | 21 | / 15 / | 13 | +6 | ||||||||
|
225 | 15 | / 14 / | 4 | +1 | ||||||||
|
194 | 15 | / 17 / | 8 | -2 | ||||||||
|
178 | 14 | / 17 / | 4 | -3 | ||||||||
|
114 | 8 | / 16 / | 11 | -8 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
258 | 19 | / 17 / | 3 | +2 | ||||||||
|
217 | 17 | / 13 / | 10 | +4 | ||||||||
|
213 | 16 | / 12 / | 12 | +4 | ||||||||
|
202 | 15 | / 16 / | 9 | -1 | ||||||||
|
183 | 12 | / 15 / | 5 | -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
344 | 27 | / 14 / | 2 | +13 | ||||||||
|
255 | 22 | / 18 / | 8 | +4 | ||||||||
|
175 | 14 | / 16 / | 6 | -2 | ||||||||
|
175 | 12 | / 17 / | 13 | -5 | ||||||||
|
156 | 15 | / 15 / | 7 | 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
289 | 21 | / 19 / | 10 | +2 | ||||||||
|
246 | 21 | / 18 / | 9 | +3 | ||||||||
|
164 | 14 | / 17 / | 7 | -3 | ||||||||
|
163 | 13 | / 16 / | 9 | -3 | ||||||||
|
134 | 11 | / 20 / | 4 | -9 |
What a match we have here! BLG looked slightly precarious at first to me against WBG, but maybe that's just because they weren't warmed up yet or something like that... FPX played flawlessly against RA so I'm expecting a good showing from them, unless Yosemite really does make a significant difference to the BLG team. I don't have a definitive prediction for this series, but I really think it could go either way. FPX has improved immensely and I expect top tier Chinese Valorant from them. 2-1 for either.
geospliced [#3]What a match we have here! BLG looked slightly precarious at first to me against WBG, but maybe that's just because they weren't warmed up yet or something like that... FPX played flawlessly against RA so I'm expecting a good showing from them, unless Yosemite really does make a significant difference to the BLG team. I don't have a definitive prediction for this series, but I really think it could go either way. FPX has improved immensely and I expect top tier Chinese Valorant from them. 2-1 for either.
BLG needs Yosemite for sure. Especially when they are fighting with FPX or EDG in CN.
Yukel [#6]BLG needs Yosemite for sure. Especially when they are fighting with FPX or EDG in CN.
Absolutely. Yosemite is one of the best support players I've seen, and he will probably make a large difference as compared to Levius in the WBG match.
Yosemite isn't here today, looks like it's going to be a tough match for BLG... Good luck!
geospliced [#3]What a match we have here! BLG looked slightly precarious at first to me against WBG, but maybe that's just because they weren't warmed up yet or something like that... FPX played flawlessly against RA so I'm expecting a good showing from them, unless Yosemite really does make a significant difference to the BLG team. I don't have a definitive prediction for this series, but I really think it could go either way. FPX has improved immensely and I expect top tier Chinese Valorant from them. 2-1 for either.
I loved it! What a spectacular match we've just had! I simply cannot believe the improvement FPX has shown in these past few weeks and I really want this team to keep winning! They all played really well but I think the Most Valuable Player of this series has got to go to Lysoar, he was amazing on Haven and I think showed up very well on Sunset. Well played and good luck to BLG in the lowers. I cannot say for sure yet but we might very well see a rematch between the two.
BerLIN Map 3
First half attacking - 3/12/5
Second half defending - 19/6/3
I've never seen him take over a map quite like that. This team looks way better than it did at champions with the addition of Autumn, and I think they can make waves in CN franchising when that comes around with the current form they have.
Subwaywang [#27]
https://www.vlr.gg/247089/funplus-phoenix-vs-t1-valorant-champions-2023-group-stage-elim-b
https://www.vlr.gg/235565/bilibili-gaming-vs-funplus-phoenix-champions-tour-2023-champions-china-qualifier-lf
https://www.vlr.gg/235564/tyloo-vs-funplus-phoenix-champions-tour-2023-champions-china-qualifier-lr3
https://www.vlr.gg/204444/edward-gaming-vs-funplus-phoenix-fgc-valorant-invitational-2023-act-2-lr1
Zerphyr1 [#28]https://www.vlr.gg/247089/funplus-phoenix-vs-t1-valorant-champions-2023-group-stage-elim-b
https://www.vlr.gg/235565/bilibili-gaming-vs-funplus-phoenix-champions-tour-2023-champions-china-qualifier-lf
https://www.vlr.gg/235564/tyloo-vs-funplus-phoenix-champions-tour-2023-champions-china-qualifier-lr3
https://www.vlr.gg/204444/edward-gaming-vs-funplus-phoenix-fgc-valorant-invitational-2023-act-2-lr1
If you take away Bind his stats aren't that bad, but that being said I think he might be the worst Bind player in history
Subwaywang [#29]If you take away Bind his stats aren't that bad, but that being said I think he might be the worst Bind player in history
... u sure about that bud