DSG VS MXM: Alternate Universe
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
0
|
4 (0)
|
1 (0)
|
2 (0)
|
15 (9)
|
![]() |
2
|
2 (2)
|
3 (1)
|
4 (2)
|
13 (8)
|
(BANK)
![]() ![]()
(BANK)
|
1
0.0k
0.0k
|
2
8.5k
$$
2.2k
|
3
0.1k
$$$
$$
13.3k
|
4
6.4k
$$$
$$$
2.1k
|
5
9.5k
$
$$$
4.6k
|
6
0.6k
$$$
$$$
17.6k
|
7
7.4k
$$
$$$
22.7k
|
8
1.8k
$$$
$$$
20.3k
|
9
12.7k
$$$
$$$
8.5k
|
10
2.8k
$$$
$$$
20.8k
|
11
6.4k
$$
$$$
21.9k
|
12
0.7k
$$$
$$$
27.2k
|
(BANK)
![]() ![]()
(BANK)
|
13
0.1k
0.3k
|
14
8.4k
$$
2.3k
|
15
0.3k
$$$
$$
11.4k
|
16
8.3k
$$$
$$$
3.3k
|
17
14.1k
$$$
$
9.4k
|
18
19.3k
$$$
$$$
2.6k
|
19
17.5k
$$$
$
10.2k
|
20
23.9k
$$$
$$$
3.6k
|
21
24.8k
$$$
$
10.4k
|
22
12.2k
$$$
$$$
10.7k
|
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1
|
3 (1)
|
1 (1)
|
3 (1)
|
12 (10)
|
![]() |
1
|
3 (1)
|
3 (0)
|
6 (3)
|
7 (2)
|
(BANK)
![]() ![]()
(BANK)
|
1
0.3k
0.2k
|
2
1.0k
$$
7.2k
|
3
13.7k
$$
$$
0.3k
|
4
2.8k
$$$
$$
7.7k
|
5
4.3k
$$$
$
10.3k
|
6
12.6k
$$$
$$$
1.9k
|
7
24.2k
$$$
$
9.1k
|
8
31.9k
$$$
$$$
3.5k
|
9
33.9k
$$$
$
9.9k
|
10
23.0k
$$$
$$$
4.8k
|
11
12.0k
$$$
$$$
13.7k
|
12
13.2k
$$$
$$$
1.2k
|
(BANK)
![]() ![]()
(BANK)
|
13
0.3k
0.5k
|
14
8.6k
$$
0.2k
|
15
0.4k
$$$
$$
8.8k
|
16
7.8k
$$$
$$
0.6k
|
17
10.8k
$$$
$$
1.3k
|
18
2.4k
$$
$$$
7.6k
|
19
6.4k
$
$$$
8.5k
|
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1
|
2 (1)
|
0 (0)
|
4 (4)
|
12 (8)
|
![]() |
1
|
4 (1)
|
2 (0)
|
6 (1)
|
6 (3)
|
(BANK)
![]() ![]()
(BANK)
|
1
0.2k
0.3k
|
2
0.2k
$$
$$
1.5k
|
3
8.6k
$$
8.5k
|
4
15.0k
$$$
$$$
0.4k
|
5
7.3k
$$$
$$
3.9k
|
6
19.9k
$$$
$
9.2k
|
7
28.6k
$$$
$$$
1.2k
|
8
29.7k
$$$
$$$
6.9k
|
9
26.5k
$$$
$$
8.6k
|
10
28.1k
$$$
$$$
1.1k
|
11
15.1k
$$$
$$
7.6k
|
12
13.4k
$$$
$$
0.9k
|
(BANK)
![]() ![]()
(BANK)
|
13
0.2k
0.3k
|
14
3.3k
$$
7.6k
|
15
14.6k
$$
$$$
0.6k
|
16
12.4k
$$$
$
8.4k
|
17
21.4k
$$$
$$$
3.1k
|
18
34.4k
$$$
$$
1.3k
|
Pistol Won | Eco (won) | $ (won) | $$ (won) | $$$ (won) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
2
|
9 (2)
|
2 (1)
|
9 (5)
|
39 (27)
|
![]() |
4
|
9 (4)
|
8 (1)
|
16 (6)
|
26 (13)
|
jkjkjk [#3]Katarina on Haven was surprisingly impressive (that ace was pretty nutty)
u say that like she isn't insane ?
Cheasle2 [#8]u say that like she isn't insane ?
idk how you reached that conclusion from what I said... it's quite the opposite
jkjkjk [#9]idk how you reached that conclusion from what I said... it's quite the opposite
surprisingly
adverb
Cheasle2 [#10]surprisingly
adverb
- in a way that causes surprise; unexpectedly.
Your thinking only makes sense if I would've claimed prior to seeing the match that Katarina is not good at the game.
Alternatively, your reply makes no sense in the context in which I did not know who Katarina was prior to seeing this match. Hence my statement is completely correct and fine without having any derogatory undertones.
You just wasted your time with the dictionary search, but I'm glad you were able to learn something new. Maybe you need to try not assuming everything is negative, you'll be SURPRISED by how different the world looks.
jkjkjk [#11]Your thinking only makes sense if I would've claimed prior to seeing the match that Katarina is not good at the game.
Alternatively, your reply makes no sense in the context in which I did not know who Katarina was prior to seeing this match. Hence my statement is completely correct and fine without having any derogatory undertones.
You just wasted your time with the dictionary search, but I'm glad you were able to learn something new. Maybe you need to try not assuming everything is negative, you'll be SURPRISED by how different the world looks.
you said "Katarina on Haven was surprisingly impressive" which which explicitly states that Katarina playing impressive is surprising, which implies you don't think her as a good player.
I don't make the rules bro, that's just English.
Cheasle2 [#12]you said "Katarina on Haven was surprisingly impressive" which which explicitly states that Katarina playing impressive is surprising, which implies you don't think her as a good player.
I don't make the rules bro, that's just English.
It looks like you don't know English too well, might need more than that dictionary.
Hint: You can be surprised by someone (or in this case, something) that you do not know. It's perfectly accurate in English.
Now that it's clear that this convo is a waste of time, I bid you farewell.
jkjkjk [#13]It looks like you don't know English too well, might need more than that dictionary.
Hint: You can be surprised by someone (or in this case, something) that you do not know. It's perfectly accurate in English.
Now that it's clear that this convo is a waste of time, I bid you farewell.
when are you guys kissing
jkjkjk [#11]Your thinking only makes sense if I would've claimed prior to seeing the match that Katarina is not good at the game.
Alternatively, your reply makes no sense in the context in which I did not know who Katarina was prior to seeing this match. Hence my statement is completely correct and fine without having any derogatory undertones.
You just wasted your time with the dictionary search, but I'm glad you were able to learn something new. Maybe you need to try not assuming everything is negative, you'll be SURPRISED by how different the world looks.
NERD EMOJI NERD EMOJI
Cheasle2 [#12]you said "Katarina on Haven was surprisingly impressive" which which explicitly states that Katarina playing impressive is surprising, which implies you don't think her as a good player.
I don't make the rules bro, that's just English.
you guys are so cute, both clearly redditors
Cheasle2 [#18]ew reddit
you sound like it, can't tell if you're either a redditor or a discord moderator, but definitely one if not both
purePaiN [#19]you sound like it, can't tell if you're either a redditor or a discord moderator, but definitely one if not both
u seem to be the expert