So its better to lose the 1st series so you just need to win 1match at lower hmmm interesting
completed
... 52 more matches
Thursday, May 25th
4:45 PM EDT
Patch 6.08
NAVI ban Haven; GIA ban Fracture; NAVI pick Pearl; GIA pick Ascent; NAVI ban Split; GIA ban Bind; Lotus remains
Betting
$100 on
Natus Vincere
returned
$135 at 1.35 pre-match odds
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Maps/Stats
13
Natus Vincere
6 /
7
Pearl
PICK
53:41
Giants Gaming
6 /
3
9
NAVI 
GIA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.48 1.33 1.65 | 263 224 311 | 23 11 12 | / 13 8 5 / | 1 1 0 | +10 +3 +7 | 82% 75% 90% | 163 133 199 | 37% 36% 38% | 5 2 3 | 1 1 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.39 0.98 1.89 | 206 174 245 | 19 8 11 | / 10 7 3 / | 6 3 3 | +9 +1 +8 | 82% 83% 80% | 143 142 144 | 46% 41% 53% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
1.08 1.09 1.08 | 207 208 207 | 16 9 7 | / 16 10 6 / | 16 9 7 | 0 -1 +1 | 82% 75% 90% | 146 141 153 | 38% 42% 33% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.00 1.05 0.95 | 225 242 205 | 16 10 6 | / 18 11 7 / | 8 2 6 | -2 -1 -1 | 82% 83% 80% | 163 161 165 | 20% 17% 24% | 3 2 1 | 1 0 1 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
0.89 0.46 1.40 | 200 135 279 | 16 5 11 | / 15 9 6 / | 3 2 1 | +1 -4 +5 | 68% 50% 90% | 153 113 201 | 24% 28% 20% | 2 0 2 | 4 2 2 | -2 -2 0 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.24 1.00 1.44 | 245 200 284 | 21 8 13 | / 17 9 8 / | 3 3 0 | +4 -1 +5 | 73% 60% 83% | 174 156 190 | 33% 18% 43% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.98 1.07 0.90 | 223 241 209 | 15 9 6 | / 19 9 10 / | 12 5 7 | -4 0 -4 | 68% 70% 67% | 149 142 156 | 34% 44% 29% | 3 2 1 | 2 0 2 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
0.71 0.11 1.21 | 134 79 181 | 11 2 9 | / 16 10 6 / | 6 4 2 | -5 -8 +3 | 68% 40% 92% | 85 45 119 | 33% 25% 37% | 1 0 1 | 2 2 0 | -1 -2 +1 | |
|
|
0.68 0.59 0.76 | 165 191 143 | 13 6 7 | / 18 10 8 / | 6 5 1 | -5 -4 -1 | 59% 60% 58% | 131 167 101 | 31% 33% 27% | 1 0 1 | 6 4 2 | -5 -4 -1 | |
|
0.56 0.28 0.80 | 150 87 204 | 12 4 8 | / 20 10 10 / | 2 0 2 | -8 -6 -2 | 59% 40% 75% | 101 50 142 | 17% 10% 19% | 4 1 3 | 2 1 1 | +2 0 +2 |
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.26 1.79 1.53 | 264 211 318 | 46 19 27 | / 25 14 11 / | 5 2 3 | +21 +5 +16 | 77% 68% 86% | 169 137 202 | 36% 34% 38% | 9 3 6 | 1 1 0 | +8 +2 +6 | |
|
|
0.85 1.43 1.14 | 245 209 281 | 39 15 24 | / 31 18 13 / | 9 4 5 | +8 -3 +11 | 73% 64% 82% | 170 147 193 | 22% 25% 17% | 7 4 3 | 9 4 5 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
|
0.98 1.14 1.06 | 182 179 185 | 27 13 14 | / 30 17 13 / | 32 18 14 | -3 -4 +1 | 82% 77% 86% | 124 114 134 | 34% 36% 33% | 4 2 2 | 3 2 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.08 1.01 1.05 | 227 237 217 | 34 18 16 | / 35 19 16 / | 15 4 11 | -1 -1 0 | 80% 77% 82% | 161 162 161 | 28% 29% 27% | 5 4 1 | 1 0 1 | +4 +4 0 | |
|
0.88 1.20 1.04 | 177 172 183 | 29 13 16 | / 26 15 11 / | 15 8 7 | +3 -2 +5 | 75% 73% 77% | 120 125 114 | 33% 36% 30% | 2 0 2 | 3 2 1 | -1 -2 +1 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0.91 1.38 1.14 | 236 192 280 | 36 14 22 | / 33 18 15 / | 20 13 7 | +3 -4 +7 | 73% 73% 73% | 175 145 205 | 29% 17% 41% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
1.08 0.75 0.92 | 202 228 177 | 31 19 12 | / 36 19 17 / | 16 9 7 | -5 0 -5 | 66% 73% 59% | 129 137 121 | 28% 33% 24% | 4 3 1 | 4 1 3 | 0 +2 -2 | |
|
|
0.74 0.98 0.86 | 198 209 187 | 32 16 16 | / 35 21 14 / | 9 7 2 | -3 -5 +2 | 66% 59% 73% | 131 138 124 | 29% 32% 25% | 5 3 2 | 11 7 4 | -6 -4 -2 | |
|
|
0.31 1.12 0.71 | 151 85 218 | 25 7 18 | / 37 21 16 / | 8 3 5 | -12 -14 +2 | 61% 45% 77% | 104 59 149 | 19% 11% 23% | 4 1 3 | 5 4 1 | -1 -3 +2 | |
|
|
0.48 0.91 0.69 | 141 118 164 | 23 10 13 | / 34 19 15 / | 15 5 10 | -11 -9 -2 | 66% 50% 82% | 87 69 104 | 27% 25% 29% | 3 1 2 | 6 2 4 | -3 -1 -2 |
13
Natus Vincere
8 /
5
Ascent
PICK
56:26
Giants Gaming
4 /
5
9
NAVI
GIA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.58 1.17 1.91 | 264 194 324 | 23 8 15 | / 12 6 6 / | 4 1 3 | +11 +2 +9 | 73% 60% 83% | 175 141 204 | 35% 32% 37% | 4 1 3 | 0 0 0 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
|
1.39 1.31 1.46 | 289 297 283 | 23 10 13 | / 16 9 7 / | 6 2 4 | +7 +1 +6 | 77% 80% 75% | 186 187 186 | 20% 24% 15% | 5 4 1 | 5 2 3 | 0 +2 -2 | |
|
|
1.09 1.13 1.06 | 228 231 227 | 18 8 10 | / 17 8 9 / | 7 2 5 | +1 0 +1 | 77% 70% 83% | 160 164 157 | 35% 44% 30% | 2 2 0 | 0 0 0 | +2 +2 0 | |
|
|
1.03 0.84 1.19 | 156 145 166 | 11 4 7 | / 14 7 7 / | 16 9 7 | -3 -3 0 | 82% 80% 83% | 102 83 119 | 30% 29% 32% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
|
0.69 0.76 0.62 | 148 169 131 | 10 5 5 | / 16 8 8 / | 9 5 4 | -6 -3 -3 | 68% 60% 75% | 96 105 89 | 20% 29% 13% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.05 0.83 1.31 | 226 185 276 | 15 6 9 | / 16 9 7 / | 17 10 7 | -1 -3 +2 | 73% 83% 60% | 176 137 224 | 27% 17% 39% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
|
1.04 0.87 1.25 | 230 224 240 | 19 10 9 | / 17 11 6 / | 3 2 1 | +2 -1 +3 | 73% 58% 90% | 131 114 153 | 27% 30% 24% | 4 3 1 | 5 3 2 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
|
0.86 0.33 1.50 | 152 83 236 | 13 3 10 | / 17 11 6 / | 6 3 3 | -4 -8 +4 | 64% 50% 80% | 108 67 157 | 20% 11% 27% | 0 0 0 | 3 3 0 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
|
0.85 1.09 0.56 | 181 217 138 | 16 10 6 | / 17 10 7 / | 4 4 0 | -1 0 -1 | 64% 75% 50% | 109 134 79 | 22% 26% 17% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
|
0.67 0.79 0.54 | 147 150 144 | 12 8 4 | / 18 9 9 / | 9 1 8 | -6 -1 -5 | 64% 58% 70% | 88 90 87 | 23% 25% 20% | 2 1 1 | 4 0 4 | -2 +1 -3 |
Head-to-head
Past Matches
User011098 [#1]So its better to lose the 1st series so you just need to win 1match at lower hmmm interesting
It's absolutely not??
Eyedd [#12]Giants could win this if they had someone better that fit0nho
Fitinho is literally not the problem. lately cloud is not playing like his usual self and he's playing worse than fitinho IMO
LJBreeze [#19]Is a bit weird that you can qualify for Tokyo going 1-2 though
It's not. They were the 2 seed, they deserve it. In total they'd be 8-4. Seems masters worthy
The_Cleg [#17]Fitinho is literally not the problem. lately cloud is not playing like his usual self and he's playing worse than fitinho IMO
Fitinho is ass bruh missing every f king shot whiff knifes
soraol [#28]navi free win
cuz cloud this overrated dogshit
Got 2 odds on gia map 2 at 9 9. Ez ct for the boys
insanepeeker [#29]Got 2 odds on gia map 2 at 9 9. Ez ct for the boys
refrain from talking until after, i'd advise
Tutatong [#3]bye Giants bots
tus putos muertos en humo le hgo la doble ouija y le parto las costillas hijo de perra
The_Cleg [#22]It's not. They were the 2 seed, they deserve it. In total they'd be 8-4. Seems masters worthy
Clearly NAVI is not the point here. This whole conversation is about how losing Upper Round 1 moves you on the the same place as losing Upper Round 2, Giants could have qualified for Tokyo by only winning this game in the entire playoffs bracket, which IS a lacklustre way to qualify.
LJBreeze [#34]Clearly NAVI is not the point here. This whole conversation is about how losing Upper Round 1 moves you on the the same place as losing Upper Round 2, Giants could have qualified for Tokyo by only winning this game in the entire playoffs bracket, which IS a lacklustre way to qualify.
It's kind of weird, but have to remember it's only for EMEA because they earned the extra slot.
Look at NA, c9 and NRG are still fighting for their lives
Discord