Neonfreak [#11]
But his Potter take isn't even valid...if you make the complaint that EG should have gotten better players at the franchising period then that is valid criticism of management but not Potter. Pansy made the statement in Sliggy's chat that she had some info on EG where the management making those player roster decisions and Potter are 2 different things. Potter coaches the players she has but she allegedly wasn't really involved in the financial signing of the players and EG is known to be reluctant to splash money on signings. So George should be criticizing the management of EG, not Potter, which he would know if he was an actual journalist
spending 2 years as head coach of a team and have minimal say in who gets picked up is unheard of, or at least should be. Ik she probably has no say in the amt of ppl that get picked up/quality of players for the most part, as that presently seems to be EG's working policy regarding signings, which is why the bulk of this is directed at EG management, but this team as a whole is kinda disappointing for how long she's been working with them.
It is a coach's job to spot and nurture potential, and so far she's been kinda lacking in that part. Dealt a bad hand from a shit dealer sure, but she's hasn't been that good a player either.
it's really obv that the root of EG's problems are really high up, but Potter and Vorborg(this is their cs team's coach btw) kinda deserve some of the heat they're getting. Kinda.
EDIT: some, potter's is blown out of proportion cause women in the industry get the tenz treatment. Do good = overwhelming/unwarranted praise, Do bad = overwhelming/unwarranted criticism.