Loud vs NRG

In your objective opinion, would NRG have done better against Fnatic than Loud has?

I Ain't Reading all that Version: Could Chet counterstrats have done enough for NRG to get more rounds than Loud has gotten vs Fnatic?

Loud and NRG were basically 50:50 in their game, but the key factor that is noticeable in this Loud v Fnatic is how little Loud worked to counter Fnatic. In this hypothetical, we are giving the two best minds in Valorant (Chet and FNS) two weeks to strat based on other teams and Fnatic. I'm not asking if NRG would have won, I don't think they would have, but simply if NRG (mostly with that MASSIVE prep period and meta knowledge) would have done better than Loud has.

aint reading allat

1 word: Leo

100% , NRG would've won tbh, unlucky they couldn't close fracture out

aint reading allat

probably. i think saadhak just was performing very very usually on fracture, playing a 4v5 basically. i doubt NRG would have won but i think they would have done better.

i read allat and yes.

aint reading the aint reading allat version

can't tell tbh. FNS is good at reading people so maybe? idk

i think loud has the best chance of taking down fnatic. Boaster has always had trouble with brazilian teams whereas he reads NA teams insanely good.

Maybe, wont know until its over

of course not....leo is by far the best player in the world atm and when the real tournaments starts fnatic will depend on him still showing this type of level

no, they lost one map because of a stomp mfers act like all 3 maps were overtimes