Against everyone, against everything

This is Brazil for you

Champions 2021 - Harmed by a strategic technical pause by RIOT (FUR vs SEN)
Champions 2021 - Do I even need to say? Imagine saying JhoW put the camera there on purpose. How braindead you have to be lol# (VK vs ACE)
Champions 2021 - Unbelievable choke from VKS because they had their pcs changed in the second half of the last match (lower fps) (VKS vs GMB)
Champions 2021 - Unexplainable 7-0 lead??? (Camera was used in 6 rounds and ACE won 3 of them. Math makes no sense) (VK vs ACE)
LockIN 2023 - koreans crying (FUR vs T1)

What else more????

relaxa, faker fez o pix

i agree with you about the cypher exploit but the nanoswarm bug deserves a penalty

the issue is that it's unbreakable, it is an exploit that can genuinely change the outcome of the game
this isn't any cypher cam or kj turret, this is a utility with 0 counterplay since you can't break it

furia still wins 2-0 anyway

just dont break the rules maybe

If u are using exploit u will be punished , simply

Ok but this molly being illegal is common knowledge bro why'd they use it

"Do I even need to say? Imagine saying JhoW put the camera there on purpose."

You're right he tripped and the camera fell under the texture

No Koreans cried here bro. They just used an exploit and are getting punished, dont make a bigger deal than it is. Also it doesn't matter if Jhow didnt use it on purpose, he used an exploit thats what matters

true it was unfair to lose -7 round it should've been an instant disqualification like every team who did it before them.

you guys cheated and you're playing the victim card? lmao

fuck off

Subreezy [#3]

i agree with you about the cypher exploit but the nanoswarm bug deserves a penalty

the issue is that it's unbreakable, it is an exploit that can genuinely change the outcome of the game
this isn't any cypher cam or kj turret, this is a utility with 0 counterplay since you can't break it

furia still wins 2-0 anyway

Why would you agree with the camera exploit? He used an exploit and was punished, it doesn't matter if he knew or if he didn't. They couldve gotten directly dqed instead of losing just 7 rounds, like X10 and Giants did

T1 went to the B site, the molly didn't affect them at that round.

Subreezy [#3]

i agree with you about the cypher exploit but the nanoswarm bug deserves a penalty

the issue is that it's unbreakable, it is an exploit that can genuinely change the outcome of the game
this isn't any cypher cam or kj turret, this is a utility with 0 counterplay since you can't break it

furia still wins 2-0 anyway

i agree with you about the cypher exploit but the nanoswarm bug deserves a penalty

2 teams from 2 different region lost the map instantly when they did it, how do you agree with him and on what?? they got the best treatment

Brazilians cheat all the time. Biggest frauds in esports history.

There are so many bugs in this game that I feel like riot will try to stop you if you go against the script. In this case, they're protecting T1. Riot cant have furia, a random team beating their favorites. If riot wanted they can use any "exploit" reason to fuck up "any" team who they dont like. I hope the players/orgs ask for actual punishments for specific exploits so the ruling cant be subjective.

wizardbot [#12]

Why would you agree with the camera exploit? He used an exploit and was punished, it doesn't matter if he knew or if he didn't. They couldve gotten directly dqed instead of losing just 7 rounds, like X10 and Giants did

you misread what i said, i agree with trembo about the math not making sense, giving acend a 7-0 lead was so stupid, either give less rounds or riot should've done their job and stopped the cypher cam round 1. they hire people to make sure people aren't exploiting or cheating, they should've been on top of that

crashhacker1 [#16]

There are so many bugs in this game that I feel like riot will try to stop you if you go against the script. In this case, they're protecting T1. Riot cant have furia, a random team beating their favorites. If riot wanted they can use any "exploit" reason to fuck up "any" team who they dont like. I hope the players/orgs ask for actual punishments for specific exploits so the ruling cant be subjective.

Its in rulebook lol

Rage Tembolona : And your mistake? Thinking you're in America. You're a long way from home. This is Brazil!
We can use all exploit we can use against you.

valulrantefanboy [#18]

Its in rulebook lol

the punishment isnt

wizardbot [#12]

Why would you agree with the camera exploit? He used an exploit and was punished, it doesn't matter if he knew or if he didn't. They couldve gotten directly dqed instead of losing just 7 rounds, like X10 and Giants did

that's the biggest issue I have with riot, they are so inconsistent in their penalties, surely you either resign a team for using a bug or retract a round right after it happened, doing both depend on the admin's humor is borderline unprofessional and damaging to the competitive integrity

NG1nS [#14]

i agree with you about the cypher exploit but the nanoswarm bug deserves a penalty

2 teams from 2 different region lost the map instantly when they did it, how do you agree with him and on what?? they got the best treatment

the instant loss is also a terrible punishment, a bad ruling by riot shouldn't set a precedent for future bad rulings. there definitely should've been a penalty, but vikings got fucked way too hard by an exploit riot should've stopped round 1

Subreezy [#22]

the instant loss is also a terrible punishment, a bad ruling by riot shouldn't set a precedent for future bad rulings. there definitely should've been a penalty, but vikings got fucked way too hard by an exploit riot should've stopped round 1

makes 0 sense, then why are you agreeing on the -7 rounds ?

crashhacker1 [#20]

the punishment isnt

-1 round. it couldn't be a lighter punishment

NG1nS [#23]

makes 0 sense, then why are you agreeing on the -7 rounds ?

not sure what you mean by agreeing, but my opinion is that giving acend a 7-0 lead was too harsh of a punishment

Subreezy [#25]

not sure what you mean by agreeing, but my opinion is that giving acend a 7-0 lead was too harsh of a punishment

too harsh according to what? ur moral compass?? it doesn't work like that my guy.
they should've gone through with the same ruling as before and after that they should've changed whatever needed changing

btw the annonced that vk lost the map first but bcz of brazilian fans getting angry on twitter they changed it riot clowns

NG1nS [#26]

too harsh according to what? ur moral compass?? it doesn't work like that my guy.
they should've gone through with the same ruling as before and after that they should've changed whatever needed changing

btw the annonced that vk lost the map first but bcz of brazilian fans getting angry on twitter they changed it riot clowns

like i said earlier, a dogshit ruling should not justify giving a future dogshit ruling. giving acend a 7-0 lead was way too harsh, and an instant DQ is even harsher than that

Subreezy [#27]

like i said earlier, a dogshit ruling should not justify giving a future dogshit ruling. giving acend a 7-0 lead was way too harsh, and an instant DQ is even harsher than that

what does harsh mean ? do you understand how this works? it was used for 6 rounds so riot came up with the most fair ruling (completely disrefarding their previous ruling) so how do you disagree with -7 rounds what could they even do other than that??

it's not their fault that they used a cheat

NG1nS [#9]

true it was unfair to lose -7 round it should've been an instant disqualification like every team who did it before them.

suygetsu Viper Wall exploit no Icebox.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSoqu0oSLes

Subreezy [#27]

like i said earlier, a dogshit ruling should not justify giving a future dogshit ruling. giving acend a 7-0 lead was way too harsh, and an instant DQ is even harsher than that

You don't have the authority to decide what's harsh or what's not
There is a rulebook, you follow it. Riot themselves decided to be LENIENT with Keyd and didn't instantly disqualify them after seeing they used the exploit. So this brazilian fan complaining about only starting 0-7, is just being whiny, as the rulebook states it's grounds for immediate disqualification.

You agreeing with him makes no sense. you did not make the rulebook. And keyd used the exploit, knowing what the rulebook states.