SEN vs 100T grand finals (watch SEN are gonna get knocked to the lower brackets again)
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.51 1.84 1.06 | 265 365 133 | 21 17 4 | / 11 8 3 / | 2 0 2 | +10 +9 +1 | 86% 83% 89% | 152 206 80 | 23% 23% 21% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.21 0.65 1.95 | 255 183 354 | 19 6 13 | / 11 9 2 / | 3 3 0 | +8 -3 +11 | 71% 67% 78% | 162 134 200 | 28% 18% 43% | 3 2 1 | 6 6 0 | -3 -4 +1 | |
|
1.20 0.79 1.76 | 253 183 347 | 18 7 11 | / 12 9 3 / | 4 3 1 | +6 -2 +8 | 81% 67% 100% | 142 123 168 | 16% 15% 18% | 5 1 4 | 1 0 1 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.06 1.06 1.07 | 232 216 254 | 18 9 9 | / 12 7 5 / | 1 1 0 | +6 +2 +4 | 76% 58% 100% | 133 140 124 | 22% 27% 17% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.66 0.32 1.11 | 116 86 157 | 7 2 5 | / 12 9 3 / | 6 2 4 | -5 -7 +2 | 57% 42% 78% | 75 63 91 | 20% 15% 25% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.98 0.87 1.06 | 193 150 226 | 13 4 9 | / 17 8 9 / | 5 3 2 | -4 -4 0 | 52% 33% 67% | 135 111 153 | 47% 44% 48% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.88 0.19 1.40 | 174 65 256 | 12 1 11 | / 17 9 8 / | 6 1 5 | -5 -8 +3 | 57% 22% 83% | 113 53 159 | 17% 0% 24% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.83 0.70 0.92 | 179 149 202 | 13 4 9 | / 17 8 9 / | 4 1 3 | -4 -4 0 | 57% 44% 67% | 121 110 129 | 18% 31% 10% | 4 0 4 | 1 0 1 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
0.73 0.24 1.11 | 141 104 170 | 11 3 8 | / 16 9 7 / | 1 0 1 | -5 -6 +1 | 52% 56% 50% | 105 63 137 | 19% 6% 29% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.64 0.41 0.81 | 134 119 145 | 9 4 5 | / 16 8 8 / | 5 1 4 | -7 -4 -3 | 48% 44% 50% | 85 58 105 | 15% 9% 17% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.46 0.96 1.22 | 221 280 156 | 51 35 16 | / 36 20 16 / | 20 11 9 | +15 +15 0 | 82% 79% 84% | 131 162 97 | 24% 23% 25% | 10 6 4 | 3 0 3 | +7 +6 +1 | |
|
1.13 1.22 1.18 | 215 197 239 | 50 25 25 | / 37 19 18 / | 24 12 12 | +13 +6 +7 | 78% 71% 87% | 133 120 146 | 23% 23% 23% | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.04 1.21 1.12 | 234 233 235 | 53 27 26 | / 41 23 18 / | 16 10 6 | +12 +4 +8 | 78% 74% 84% | 153 163 142 | 25% 22% 29% | 9 4 5 | 8 7 1 | +1 -3 +4 | |
|
0.76 1.44 1.09 | 266 218 320 | 61 26 35 | / 44 29 15 / | 13 7 6 | +17 -3 +20 | 68% 62% 74% | 157 138 177 | 19% 22% 17% | 14 5 9 | 6 3 3 | +8 +2 +6 | |
|
1.05 0.99 1.02 | 203 201 205 | 48 26 22 | / 37 19 18 / | 16 9 7 | +11 +7 +4 | 83% 74% 94% | 124 139 108 | 21% 27% 16% | 8 3 5 | 3 3 0 | +5 0 +5 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.67 1.58 1.14 | 234 164 301 | 56 19 37 | / 51 28 23 / | 8 4 4 | +5 -9 +14 | 65% 61% 68% | 144 97 188 | 22% 19% 23% | 7 3 4 | 14 11 3 | -7 -8 +1 | |
|
1.00 0.75 0.87 | 175 192 159 | 38 20 18 | / 50 23 27 / | 21 10 11 | -12 -3 -9 | 63% 65% 62% | 114 122 107 | 38% 41% 36% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
0.85 0.74 0.79 | 161 152 169 | 36 18 18 | / 51 23 28 / | 14 6 8 | -15 -5 -10 | 58% 58% 59% | 105 95 115 | 21% 18% 24% | 4 2 2 | 10 4 6 | -6 -2 -4 | |
|
0.60 0.85 0.73 | 179 157 199 | 35 15 20 | / 58 29 29 / | 21 6 15 | -23 -14 -9 | 60% 48% 71% | 116 99 132 | 18% 15% 21% | 3 1 2 | 14 7 7 | -11 -6 -5 | |
|
0.65 0.60 0.62 | 143 136 148 | 30 15 15 | / 53 26 27 / | 11 3 8 | -23 -11 -12 | 58% 55% 62% | 99 90 108 | 19% 24% 15% | 5 1 4 | 3 1 2 | +2 0 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.30 1.77 0.74 | 246 316 164 | 21 15 6 | / 12 5 7 / | 5 3 2 | +9 +10 -1 | 86% 83% 90% | 146 194 88 | 33% 32% 36% | 7 4 3 | 1 0 1 | +6 +4 +2 | |
|
1.25 1.38 1.09 | 283 318 242 | 22 15 7 | / 16 8 8 / | 8 4 4 | +6 +7 -1 | 86% 75% 100% | 168 198 132 | 25% 29% 20% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.09 0.71 1.53 | 260 207 326 | 21 9 12 | / 13 10 3 / | 4 2 2 | +8 -1 +9 | 64% 58% 70% | 159 152 167 | 26% 35% 19% | 4 2 2 | 1 0 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
0.92 0.94 0.90 | 169 135 212 | 12 6 6 | / 13 6 7 / | 14 8 6 | -1 0 -1 | 82% 75% 90% | 107 87 130 | 17% 8% 24% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
0.90 1.04 0.74 | 176 188 163 | 15 10 5 | / 12 6 6 / | 6 4 2 | +3 +4 -1 | 82% 75% 90% | 105 133 72 | 22% 35% 6% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 0.57 1.80 | 259 152 349 | 21 6 15 | / 18 9 9 / | 4 2 2 | +3 -3 +6 | 73% 70% 75% | 143 72 203 | 20% 20% 20% | 4 2 2 | 6 5 1 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.94 1.36 0.60 | 205 315 115 | 15 11 4 | / 18 8 10 / | 10 3 7 | -3 +3 -6 | 64% 70% 58% | 132 185 88 | 37% 60% 13% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.89 0.98 0.81 | 149 129 166 | 12 5 7 | / 17 7 10 / | 5 2 3 | -5 -2 -3 | 64% 60% 67% | 100 86 112 | 28% 27% 29% | 0 0 0 | 4 0 4 | -4 0 -4 | |
|
0.59 0.88 0.36 | 157 217 108 | 10 7 3 | / 20 9 11 / | 7 3 4 | -10 -2 -8 | 59% 70% 50% | 93 114 76 | 14% 21% 9% | 0 0 0 | 7 2 5 | -7 -2 -5 | |
|
0.52 0.57 0.48 | 122 110 133 | 8 4 4 | / 18 7 11 / | 4 1 3 | -10 -3 -7 | 59% 50% 67% | 81 63 96 | 16% 8% 22% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.93 2.35 1.57 | 360 406 323 | 31 17 14 | / 12 4 8 / | 4 2 2 | +19 +13 +6 | 95% 100% 92% | 213 229 200 | 27% 31% 23% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.10 1.05 1.14 | 202 200 204 | 15 7 8 | / 13 6 7 / | 9 4 5 | +2 +1 +1 | 91% 90% 92% | 135 143 127 | 20% 19% 21% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.97 0.79 1.12 | 285 274 296 | 22 10 12 | / 19 10 9 / | 5 2 3 | +3 0 +3 | 59% 60% 58% | 169 141 192 | 18% 21% 16% | 5 2 3 | 4 3 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.91 1.09 0.75 | 163 193 139 | 12 6 6 | / 14 6 8 / | 5 3 2 | -2 0 -2 | 77% 80% 75% | 129 158 106 | 20% 17% 27% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.88 0.65 1.07 | 152 135 167 | 9 3 6 | / 13 7 6 / | 13 8 5 | -4 -4 0 | 73% 70% 75% | 97 71 118 | 15% 5% 21% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.44 1.08 1.87 | 301 220 400 | 24 10 14 | / 17 10 7 / | 3 2 1 | +7 0 +7 | 68% 58% 80% | 183 142 233 | 25% 27% 24% | 0 0 0 | 5 4 1 | -5 -4 -1 | |
|
0.84 1.07 0.57 | 199 197 203 | 15 9 6 | / 18 8 10 / | 4 3 1 | -3 +1 -4 | 64% 67% 60% | 131 132 130 | 22% 17% 29% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
0.73 0.68 0.79 | 205 176 241 | 13 7 6 | / 21 11 10 / | 8 2 6 | -8 -4 -4 | 64% 50% 80% | 143 122 167 | 22% 17% 28% | 3 1 2 | 5 3 2 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.70 0.80 0.57 | 127 122 133 | 10 5 5 | / 15 7 8 / | 6 4 2 | -5 -2 -3 | 73% 83% 60% | 76 78 73 | 29% 20% 50% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.53 0.68 0.36 | 127 149 101 | 9 7 2 | / 18 11 7 / | 3 1 2 | -9 -4 -5 | 59% 67% 50% | 96 97 95 | 22% 31% 14% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
I feel like losing to ABX in R1 and not making challengers 1 has given them more to fight for. They are using their losses as energy and they keep fighting back. Look how they were against T1, they were down horribly but came back to win 2 back to back games. It proves they still have the fight that they had in Masters. 100T has a better track record in previous games, but SEN can change how a match is and find drive when it seems like they've lost.
I agree with this but not really. SEN will definitely have the motivation to make a comeback after they struggled previously this stage, but I feel like it also makes them a little shaky and more inconsistent. 100T have been steadily consistent and have only shown improvement imo. If we see SEN lock in and fix their struggles, then they could take this tournament. Otherwise, 100T takes this with dominance.
Well after losing R1 to ABX they went close to flawless the rest of the tourney and they 3-0 a promising looking C9 Blue (weird to say c9 blue looks promising). They have the drive and they put up a solid performance through the lower bracket. Both teams are solid going into finals with solid rosters and performances. Its a tough choice, but SEN's run from a R1 loss has shown me more drive than 100T which makes me think they are more solid.
C9 vs NV C9 wins 3-1
I hope c9 does well in iceland. They're on their honeymoon period and it's probably not gonna last till iceland. Hope they figure something out to represent NA well ^^ NV on the other hand should do good. FNS has loads of experience and has represented NA multiple times in international LANs.