SEN vs 100T grand finals (watch SEN are gonna get knocked to the lower brackets again)
Sunday, May 2nd
4:00 PM EDT
Patch 2.07
SEN pick Bind; SEN pick Haven; V1 pick Icebox; V1 pick Ascent; Split remains
Betting
Anonymous Betting & Instant Crypto Withdrawals
Ended
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
VODs
Maps/Stats
13
Sentinels
5 /
8
Bind
PICK
37:42
Version1
7 /
1
8
SEN 
V1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.51 1.84 1.06 | 265 365 133 | 21 17 4 | / 11 8 3 / | 2 0 2 | +10 +9 +1 | 86% 83% 89% | 152 206 80 | 23% 23% 21% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.21 0.65 1.95 | 255 183 354 | 19 6 13 | / 11 9 2 / | 3 3 0 | +8 -3 +11 | 71% 67% 78% | 162 134 200 | 28% 18% 43% | 3 2 1 | 6 6 0 | -3 -4 +1 | |
|
1.20 0.79 1.76 | 253 183 347 | 18 7 11 | / 12 9 3 / | 4 3 1 | +6 -2 +8 | 81% 67% 100% | 142 123 168 | 16% 15% 18% | 5 1 4 | 1 0 1 | +4 +1 +3 | |
|
1.06 1.06 1.07 | 232 216 254 | 18 9 9 | / 12 7 5 / | 1 1 0 | +6 +2 +4 | 76% 58% 100% | 133 140 124 | 22% 27% 17% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
0.66 0.32 1.11 | 116 86 157 | 7 2 5 | / 12 9 3 / | 6 2 4 | -5 -7 +2 | 57% 42% 78% | 75 63 91 | 20% 15% 25% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0.98 0.87 1.06 | 193 150 226 | 13 4 9 | / 17 8 9 / | 5 3 2 | -4 -4 0 | 52% 33% 67% | 135 111 153 | 47% 44% 48% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
|
0.88 0.19 1.40 | 174 65 256 | 12 1 11 | / 17 9 8 / | 6 1 5 | -5 -8 +3 | 57% 22% 83% | 113 53 159 | 17% 0% 24% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
0.83 0.70 0.92 | 179 149 202 | 13 4 9 | / 17 8 9 / | 4 1 3 | -4 -4 0 | 57% 44% 67% | 121 110 129 | 18% 31% 10% | 4 0 4 | 1 0 1 | +3 0 +3 | |
|
|
0.73 0.24 1.11 | 141 104 170 | 11 3 8 | / 16 9 7 / | 1 0 1 | -5 -6 +1 | 52% 56% 50% | 105 63 137 | 19% 6% 29% | 3 1 2 | 3 2 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.64 0.41 0.81 | 134 119 145 | 9 4 5 | / 16 8 8 / | 5 1 4 | -7 -4 -3 | 48% 44% 50% | 85 58 105 | 15% 9% 17% | 0 0 0 | 4 3 1 | -4 -3 -1 |
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.46 0.96 1.22 | 221 280 156 | 51 35 16 | / 36 20 16 / | 20 11 9 | +15 +15 0 | 82% 79% 84% | 131 162 97 | 24% 23% 25% | 10 6 4 | 3 0 3 | +7 +6 +1 | |
|
1.13 1.22 1.18 | 215 197 239 | 50 25 25 | / 37 19 18 / | 24 12 12 | +13 +6 +7 | 78% 71% 87% | 133 120 146 | 23% 23% 23% | 4 3 1 | 0 0 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
1.04 1.21 1.12 | 234 233 235 | 53 27 26 | / 41 23 18 / | 16 10 6 | +12 +4 +8 | 78% 74% 84% | 153 163 142 | 25% 22% 29% | 9 4 5 | 8 7 1 | +1 -3 +4 | |
|
|
0.76 1.44 1.09 | 266 218 320 | 61 26 35 | / 44 29 15 / | 13 7 6 | +17 -3 +20 | 68% 62% 74% | 157 138 177 | 19% 22% 17% | 14 5 9 | 6 3 3 | +8 +2 +6 | |
|
|
1.05 0.99 1.02 | 203 201 205 | 48 26 22 | / 37 19 18 / | 16 9 7 | +11 +7 +4 | 83% 74% 94% | 124 139 108 | 21% 27% 16% | 8 3 5 | 3 3 0 | +5 0 +5 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
0.67 1.58 1.14 | 234 164 301 | 56 19 37 | / 51 28 23 / | 8 4 4 | +5 -9 +14 | 65% 61% 68% | 144 97 188 | 22% 19% 23% | 7 3 4 | 14 11 3 | -7 -8 +1 | |
|
|
1.00 0.75 0.87 | 175 192 159 | 38 20 18 | / 50 23 27 / | 21 10 11 | -12 -3 -9 | 63% 65% 62% | 114 122 107 | 38% 41% 36% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |
|
|
0.85 0.74 0.79 | 161 152 169 | 36 18 18 | / 51 23 28 / | 14 6 8 | -15 -5 -10 | 58% 58% 59% | 105 95 115 | 21% 18% 24% | 4 2 2 | 10 4 6 | -6 -2 -4 | |
|
|
0.60 0.85 0.73 | 179 157 199 | 35 15 20 | / 58 29 29 / | 21 6 15 | -23 -14 -9 | 60% 48% 71% | 116 99 132 | 18% 15% 21% | 3 1 2 | 14 7 7 | -11 -6 -5 | |
|
|
0.65 0.60 0.62 | 143 136 148 | 30 15 15 | / 53 26 27 / | 11 3 8 | -23 -11 -12 | 58% 55% 62% | 99 90 108 | 19% 24% 15% | 5 1 4 | 3 1 2 | +2 0 +2 |
13
Sentinels
8 /
5
Haven
PICK
40:49
Version1
4 /
5
9
SEN
V1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.30 1.77 0.74 | 246 316 164 | 21 15 6 | / 12 5 7 / | 5 3 2 | +9 +10 -1 | 86% 83% 90% | 146 194 88 | 33% 32% 36% | 7 4 3 | 1 0 1 | +6 +4 +2 | |
|
|
1.25 1.38 1.09 | 283 318 242 | 22 15 7 | / 16 8 8 / | 8 4 4 | +6 +7 -1 | 86% 75% 100% | 168 198 132 | 25% 29% 20% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
|
1.09 0.71 1.53 | 260 207 326 | 21 9 12 | / 13 10 3 / | 4 2 2 | +8 -1 +9 | 64% 58% 70% | 159 152 167 | 26% 35% 19% | 4 2 2 | 1 0 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
|
0.92 0.94 0.90 | 169 135 212 | 12 6 6 | / 13 6 7 / | 14 8 6 | -1 0 -1 | 82% 75% 90% | 107 87 130 | 17% 8% 24% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
|
0.90 1.04 0.74 | 176 188 163 | 15 10 5 | / 12 6 6 / | 6 4 2 | +3 +4 -1 | 82% 75% 90% | 105 133 72 | 22% 35% 6% | 3 1 2 | 1 1 0 | +2 0 +2 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.24 0.57 1.80 | 259 152 349 | 21 6 15 | / 18 9 9 / | 4 2 2 | +3 -3 +6 | 73% 70% 75% | 143 72 203 | 20% 20% 20% | 4 2 2 | 6 5 1 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
|
0.94 1.36 0.60 | 205 315 115 | 15 11 4 | / 18 8 10 / | 10 3 7 | -3 +3 -6 | 64% 70% 58% | 132 185 88 | 37% 60% 13% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
|
0.89 0.98 0.81 | 149 129 166 | 12 5 7 | / 17 7 10 / | 5 2 3 | -5 -2 -3 | 64% 60% 67% | 100 86 112 | 28% 27% 29% | 0 0 0 | 4 0 4 | -4 0 -4 | |
|
|
0.59 0.88 0.36 | 157 217 108 | 10 7 3 | / 20 9 11 / | 7 3 4 | -10 -2 -8 | 59% 70% 50% | 93 114 76 | 14% 21% 9% | 0 0 0 | 7 2 5 | -7 -2 -5 | |
|
|
0.52 0.57 0.48 | 122 110 133 | 8 4 4 | / 18 7 11 / | 4 1 3 | -10 -3 -7 | 59% 50% 67% | 81 63 96 | 16% 8% 22% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 |
13
Sentinels
6 /
7
Icebox
PICK
38:27
Version1
6 /
3
9
SEN
V1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
All
Attack
Defend
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.93 2.35 1.57 | 360 406 323 | 31 17 14 | / 12 4 8 / | 4 2 2 | +19 +13 +6 | 95% 100% 92% | 213 229 200 | 27% 31% 23% | 3 2 1 | 0 0 0 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
|
1.10 1.05 1.14 | 202 200 204 | 15 7 8 | / 13 6 7 / | 9 4 5 | +2 +1 +1 | 91% 90% 92% | 135 143 127 | 20% 19% 21% | 2 1 1 | 1 1 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
|
0.97 0.79 1.12 | 285 274 296 | 22 10 12 | / 19 10 9 / | 5 2 3 | +3 0 +3 | 59% 60% 58% | 169 141 192 | 18% 21% 16% | 5 2 3 | 4 3 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
|
0.91 1.09 0.75 | 163 193 139 | 12 6 6 | / 14 6 8 / | 5 3 2 | -2 0 -2 | 77% 80% 75% | 129 158 106 | 20% 17% 27% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
|
0.88 0.65 1.07 | 152 135 167 | 9 3 6 | / 13 7 6 / | 13 8 5 | -4 -4 0 | 73% 70% 75% | 97 71 118 | 15% 5% 21% | 1 1 0 | 2 0 2 | -1 +1 -2 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
1.44 1.08 1.87 | 301 220 400 | 24 10 14 | / 17 10 7 / | 3 2 1 | +7 0 +7 | 68% 58% 80% | 183 142 233 | 25% 27% 24% | 0 0 0 | 5 4 1 | -5 -4 -1 | |
|
|
0.84 1.07 0.57 | 199 197 203 | 15 9 6 | / 18 8 10 / | 4 3 1 | -3 +1 -4 | 64% 67% 60% | 131 132 130 | 22% 17% 29% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
|
0.73 0.68 0.79 | 205 176 241 | 13 7 6 | / 21 11 10 / | 8 2 6 | -8 -4 -4 | 64% 50% 80% | 143 122 167 | 22% 17% 28% | 3 1 2 | 5 3 2 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
|
0.70 0.80 0.57 | 127 122 133 | 10 5 5 | / 15 7 8 / | 6 4 2 | -5 -2 -3 | 73% 83% 60% | 76 78 73 | 29% 20% 50% | 0 0 0 | 1 0 1 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
|
0.53 0.68 0.36 | 127 149 101 | 9 7 2 | / 18 11 7 / | 3 1 2 | -9 -4 -5 | 59% 67% 50% | 96 97 95 | 22% 31% 14% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
Head-to-head
Past Matches
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
m
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
u get 40k opposed to getting 20k if in second place
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
1st gets 40k second gets 20k not bad
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
"money is money who cares about seeding" -Dapr
GodOfPog [#6]"money is money who cares about seeding" -Dapr
fr tho seeding is not that important I mean andbox got the 8th seed and defeated sen in a 2-0 fashion
Styx [#13]SEN 3-2 100T
Both are very strong teams but I feel like SEN wants it more, to prove that they still are the best team in NA after Masters 1.
After not making challengers 1 and losing to ABX in challengers 2 I feel like 100T are more solid than SEN. I could be wrong tho
alexzoid [#15]After not making challengers 1 and losing to ABX in challengers 2 I feel like 100T are more solid than SEN. I could be wrong tho
I feel like losing to ABX in R1 and not making challengers 1 has given them more to fight for. They are using their losses as energy and they keep fighting back. Look how they were against T1, they were down horribly but came back to win 2 back to back games. It proves they still have the fight that they had in Masters. 100T has a better track record in previous games, but SEN can change how a match is and find drive when it seems like they've lost.
Styx [#16]I feel like losing to ABX in R1 and not making challengers 1 has given them more to fight for. They are using their losses as energy and they keep fighting back. Look how they were against T1, they were down horribly but came back to win 2 back to back games. It proves they still have the fight that they had in Masters. 100T has a better track record in previous games, but SEN can change how a match is and find drive when it seems like they've lost.
I agree with this but not really. SEN will definitely have the motivation to make a comeback after they struggled previously this stage, but I feel like it also makes them a little shaky and more inconsistent. 100T have been steadily consistent and have only shown improvement imo. If we see SEN lock in and fix their struggles, then they could take this tournament. Otherwise, 100T takes this with dominance.
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
what about like... idk, PRIZE MONEY
alexzoid [#21]I agree with this but not really. SEN will definitely have the motivation to make a comeback after they struggled previously this stage, but I feel like it also makes them a little shaky and more inconsistent. 100T have been steadily consistent and have only shown improvement imo. If we see SEN lock in and fix their struggles, then they could take this tournament. Otherwise, 100T takes this with dominance.
Well after losing R1 to ABX they went close to flawless the rest of the tourney and they 3-0 a promising looking C9 Blue (weird to say c9 blue looks promising). They have the drive and they put up a solid performance through the lower bracket. Both teams are solid going into finals with solid rosters and performances. Its a tough choice, but SEN's run from a R1 loss has shown me more drive than 100T which makes me think they are more solid.
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
nt
Styx [#25]Well after losing R1 to ABX they went close to flawless the rest of the tourney and they 3-0 a promising looking C9 Blue (weird to say c9 blue looks promising). They have the drive and they put up a solid performance through the lower bracket. Both teams are solid going into finals with solid rosters and performances. Its a tough choice, but SEN's run from a R1 loss has shown me more drive than 100T which makes me think they are more solid.
close to flawless? they should've lost to T1 but T1 threw 2 maps, and IMT also threw haven. It wasn't flawless, the other teams just threw harder.
Psion [#27]close to flawless? they should've lost to T1 but T1 threw 2 maps, and IMT also threw haven. It wasn't flawless, the other teams just threw harder.
That's why I said close to flawless, they still won the match even with being down. Also, why would these teams want to throw?? They all want to make it to finals/masters. It makes no sense for them to throw.
Styx [#29]That's why I said close to flawless, they still won the match even with being down. Also, why would these teams want to throw?? They all want to make it to finals/masters. It makes no sense for them to throw.
almost losing twice is not close to flawless XD. They didn't purposely throw, they just made all the wrong moves and decisions.
Psion [#30]almost losing twice is not close to flawless XD. They didn't purposely throw, they just made all the wrong moves and decisions.
They almost lost but didnt.... that is why it was close to flawless, they won 2-1 in 2/5 series. That is less than 50% and close to flawless.
PG_newt [#22]what about like... idk, PRIZE MONEY
yeah just like he said no one cares about seeding in terms of placements but seeding in MONEY is heck of a lot
Rizvi [#2]This match would actually be useless, both teams would already be qualified and there is actually no seeding required
this match is just for the prize money, first place gets double the amount of money as second place
Bobstar [#1]SEN vs 100T grand finals (watch SEN are gonna get knocked to the lower brackets again)
Oh no
Bobstar [#1]SEN vs 100T grand finals (watch SEN are gonna get knocked to the lower brackets again)
Who's gonna tell him?
C9 vs NV C9 wins 3-1
I hope c9 does well in iceland. They're on their honeymoon period and it's probably not gonna last till iceland. Hope they figure something out to represent NA well ^^ NV on the other hand should do good. FNS has loads of experience and has represented NA multiple times in international LANs.
greedeetv [#48]What I want... C9 vs V1. What I think... SEN vs C9.
if version 1 qualifies for Iceland Sentinels doesnt...i am gonna be so pissed.
Shush [#47]C9 vs NV C9 wins 3-1
I hope c9 does well in iceland. They're on their honeymoon period and it's probably not gonna last till iceland. Hope they figure something out to represent NA well ^^ NV on the other hand should do good. FNS has loads of experience and has represented NA multiple times in international LANs.
What am I getting down voted for, c9 honeymoon period? Lol
ErenJaeger [#58]SEN vs C9 getting boring
I wanna see Sen vs NV
c9 need to get their revenge at some point tho
HaSanity [#65]Does winning give you seeding or is it just money? So basically this match doesn’t matter?
Winners get seeded in group A (most probably group A gets to ban/pick maps first in semis)
HaSanity [#65]Does winning give you seeding or is it just money? So basically this match doesn’t matter?
-
ranker11 [#66]Winners get seeded in group A (most probably group A gets to ban/pick maps first in semis)
how do u know?
raka_gg [#63]Wooooohoooo
Can't wait to watch 5 maps of teams saving strats and just running around
doubt they still have strats to save. Both teams have given their all during their previous matches. So, it doesn't make sense to not give their all again for an extra 20k, maybe with less pressure for sure.
ihsazal [#70]SEN deserves it more than any team
yeah they deserve to win but who knows who's gonna win this last match
sarahjames [#52]now at this point just imagine these two teams are SEN and C9... and the question is will C9 let SEN get TenZ on loan for LAN?? what you guys think
It is confirmed that tenz will represent sentinels at iceland too
sarahjames [#52]now at this point just imagine these two teams are SEN and C9... and the question is will C9 let SEN get TenZ on loan for LAN?? what you guys think
sen gets tenz till iceland, jack already said that
ac130 [#76]if either of these teams troll to save strats im gonna be so disappointed
Fnatic - TL did troll last bo5 and u expect NA teams will not? Especially a team with dapr? LuL
plas [#77]they will
Actually if u take a look at sen final record, they rarely troll even if it doesn't matter. They try to make a point. Last finals C9 trolled but I doubt vanity would. So maybe we get a decent match not a high quality one but fun : )
Bobstar [#1]SEN vs 100T grand finals (watch SEN are gonna get knocked to the lower brackets again)
should we tell him? or let him find out?
Novaura [#7]The winner of 100t vs Andbox and NV will be making rejavik
yes ....you are 100% correct.. sry xD
plas [#77]they will
SEN wont be in hard focus mode like back when they were down against T1 in challengers 2 trying to qualify or any of the matches before this cause there's not as much on the line, but they definitely wont be trolling
Insyte [#85]SEN wont be in hard focus mode like back when they were down against T1 in challengers 2 trying to qualify or any of the matches before this cause there's not as much on the line, but they definitely wont be trolling
well yeah thats what i meant, obviously not trolling but not trying as hard
viper699mw [#87]I'd not mind if this BO5 is a troll game, not because teams want to save strats or anything. This is a good moment to try some agent combos which you can't in intense games. Personally, I'd like to see some Yorus and some more Vipers.
I agree, but I don't know what planet you've been living on if you still think viper is an agent you can't play in intense games lmao
FordTom [#88]I agree, but I don't know what planet you've been living on if you still think viper is an agent you can't play in intense games lmao
viper is a fucking must in this meta lmfao
viper699mw [#87]I'd not mind if this BO5 is a troll game, not because teams want to save strats or anything. This is a good moment to try some agent combos which you can't in intense games. Personally, I'd like to see some Yorus and some more Vipers.
na has no strat. they just molly somewhere with lineups
Origin [#95]Actually making a prediction -_-
Coming back after all the matches and replying to all the wrong predictions ( ͡ᵔ ‿ ͡ᵔ)
Ikr
raka_gg [#97]if V1 cared they would win this 3-1, since they don't give a fuck SEN wins 3-1
Another bad take from you??
gradualhorizon [#101]I predict that SEN or V1 will win this match, something tells me.
Thank you for your wisdom, oh wise one
VALoka [#4]u get 40k opposed to getting 20k if in second place
Don't they also play for circuit points in this too? If they do then its important for V1 as they started out this event with no pts.
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#111]SicK's preaim is out of this world tbh
fr sick in the running for the best player in na
salty [#104]Don't they also play for circuit points in this too? If they do then its important for V1 as they started out this event with no pts.
no their circuit points come from how they place in iceland
kyLeria_ [#116]Did you see penny's peek there when it was real important clutch moment? Spike planted and you peek even before hearing a defuse .. This is the biggest problem of NA.
i think penny just want to caught sicK off guard
alexzoid [#21]I agree with this but not really. SEN will definitely have the motivation to make a comeback after they struggled previously this stage, but I feel like it also makes them a little shaky and more inconsistent. 100T have been steadily consistent and have only shown improvement imo. If we see SEN lock in and fix their struggles, then they could take this tournament. Otherwise, 100T takes this with dominance.
imagine doubting sentinels
cryyBAE [#107]Let's see V1 true potential
would be stupid of them to go all out on a match with no consequences. If they have any brain they would save their true stuff in Iceland, not in a game where it doesnt matter
plas [#114]SEN is just better. simple
Bind is V1's worst map and they had everyone on new agents....
Snev [#123]Bind is V1's worst map and they had everyone on new agents....
okay? SEN is still better in other maps
Snev [#123]Bind is V1's worst map and they had everyone on new agents....
Isn't Bind like Sentinels worst map too? Lmao
STRAWHAT [#127]From being down one map down 3-9 at half in lower bracket of the 2nd closed qualifier against T1 to this........
I mean even if you are a SEN hater you have to be glad that they will represent us in Iceland. Their mental is untouchable.
and in most of their series' on the way to the final they lost a map like 13-1 or 13-0
STRAWHAT [#127]From being down one map down 3-9 at half in lower bracket of the 2nd closed qualifier against T1 to this........
I mean even if you are a SEN hater you have to be glad that they will represent us in Iceland. Their mental is untouchable.
Also if you are a SEN fan, you better be thanking Riot for blessing challengers 2 with double elimination.
STRAWHAT [#127]From being down one map down 3-9 at half in lower bracket of the 2nd closed qualifier against T1 to this........
I mean even if you are a SEN hater you have to be glad that they will represent us in Iceland. Their mental is untouchable.
correct me If i'm wrong but It was T1 not ABX didn't it? they got 1 map lead against ABX but against T1 they down 1 map and lose so bad in split first half
Sogou [#131]correct me If i'm wrong but It was T1 not ABX didn't it? they got 1 map lead against ABX but against T1 they down 1 map and lose so bad in split first half
it was indeed T1 thanks for correction !
Kibitz [#129]another boring finals tf, why it always going 3 0 geez
because SEN just rekts every NA team when it matters. Its really sad that how it is.
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#130]Also if you are a SEN fan, you better be thanking Riot for blessing challengers 2 with double elimination.
Its like G2 league of legends with losers bracket, ty riot
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#133]I'm watching Shroud's restream and they're talking about AR gaming for bidets where the objective is to clean shit from other people's asses like it's aimlab. Is this normal?
I really like the costreams because people can just chill and say stupid shit, there are the hype costreams and the chill ones
Kibitz [#129]another boring finals tf, why it always going 3 0 geez
Because Sentinels are simply much better than every other NA teams
capita1 [#136]I really like the costreams because people can just chill and say stupid shit, there are the hype costreams and the chill ones
yeah it’s way more entertaining imo
hilo0829 [#139]would not have made it here with sinatraa
atleast we got 1 team that can do well in iceland
no hope for V1 lul
how do you know they wouldnt have? you literally dont know that
SHotgun6969 [#64]I think this should be an easy win for Sentinels but really disappointed to see 100T and C9B knocked out so for now, I am looking forward to Sentinels and Version 1 compete in Reykjavik.
Hot take: C9 Blue will be 10 times better in Stage 3 compared to now. More time to practice with Floppy, get more familiar with Viper, Xeppa also playing in Challengers 1 instead of Poiz. As the team have said multiple times, it's only up from here
turkey [#118]no their circuit points come from how they place in iceland
Yeah, but wherever they place in Iceland, they are guaranteed 150 circuit points at the least, which takes sen to 250. they can easily make it to champions IMO
JCBrute [#144]Yeah, but wherever they place in Iceland, they are guaranteed 150 circuit points at the least, which takes sen to 250. they can easily make it to champions IMO
yeah i think their ticket is already punched to champions i think they’ll do well in stage 3 too
Styx [#31]They almost lost but didnt.... that is why it was close to flawless, they won 2-1 in 2/5 series. That is less than 50% and close to flawless.
you ended up being smarter than me
hilo0829 [#139]would not have made it here with sinatraa
atleast we got 1 team that can do well in iceland
no hope for V1 lul
They were better with sinatraa though...
Discord