100T 2-0 with nitr0, Ethan, and Asuna being +40 in kills difference together.
vice
ABX
|
mada
ABX
|
b0i
ABX
|
yay
ABX
|
seb
ABX
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
8
6
+2
|
8
5
+3
|
8
2
+6
|
8
4
+4
|
3
5
-2
|
steel
100T
|
5
7
-2
|
7
7
+0
|
13
5
+8
|
9
4
+5
|
4
5
-1
|
Asuna
100T
|
7
4
+3
|
11
10
+1
|
6
5
+1
|
3
3
+0
|
5
8
-3
|
nitr0
100T
|
7
4
+3
|
4
8
-4
|
4
6
-2
|
4
6
-2
|
12
8
+4
|
Ethan
100T
|
7
3
+4
|
7
4
+3
|
3
10
-7
|
8
6
+2
|
8
4
+4
|
vice
ABX
|
mada
ABX
|
b0i
ABX
|
yay
ABX
|
seb
ABX
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
steel
100T
|
1
0
+1
|
1
2
-1
|
3
1
+2
|
1
2
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
Asuna
100T
|
1
0
+1
|
5
5
+0
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
1
0
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
3
1
+2
|
3
0
+3
|
vice
ABX
|
mada
ABX
|
b0i
ABX
|
yay
ABX
|
seb
ABX
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
steel
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hiko
100T
|
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
74
|
3
|
3
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
2
|
0
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
8
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
2
|
1
|
steel
100T
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
8
|
0
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
8
|
2
|
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
59
|
1
|
0
|
b0i
ABX
|
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
2
|
0
|
yay
ABX
|
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
2
|
1
|
vice
ABX
|
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
5
|
1
|
seb
ABX
|
|
4
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
50
|
2
|
1
|
mada
ABX
|
|
7
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
0
|
2
|
vice
ABX
|
mada
ABX
|
b0i
ABX
|
yay
ABX
|
seb
ABX
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
5
2
+3
|
5
3
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
4
2
+2
|
1
2
-1
|
steel
100T
|
3
1
+2
|
3
4
-1
|
5
2
+3
|
4
2
+2
|
2
3
-1
|
Asuna
100T
|
3
2
+1
|
6
3
+3
|
5
4
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
1
4
-3
|
nitr0
100T
|
5
1
+4
|
2
2
+0
|
1
4
-3
|
3
4
-1
|
7
3
+4
|
Ethan
100T
|
3
1
+2
|
2
3
-1
|
1
6
-5
|
3
2
+1
|
3
1
+2
|
vice
ABX
|
mada
ABX
|
b0i
ABX
|
yay
ABX
|
seb
ABX
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
steel
100T
|
1
0
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
4
3
+1
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
1
0
+1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
vice
ABX
|
mada
ABX
|
b0i
ABX
|
yay
ABX
|
seb
ABX
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
steel
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hiko
100T
|
|
3
Round 6
yay
vice
Round 14
yay
b0i
Round 20
yay
mada
|
1
Round 1
mada
b0i
vice
|
|
|
|
1
Round 1
b0i
vice
|
|
|
|
57
|
1
|
0
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
2
Round 6
mada
b0i
Round 18
yay
vice
|
2
Round 4
mada
yay
vice
Round 5
vice
seb
b0i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
1
|
0
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
4
Round 1
seb
yay
Round 15
vice
mada
Round 16
vice
seb
Round 19
yay
seb
|
2
Round 11
mada
seb
vice
Round 17
seb
yay
b0i
|
|
|
1
Round 9
seb
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
0
|
1
|
steel
100T
|
|
4
Round 2
seb
b0i
Round 9
vice
b0i
Round 13
mada
vice
Round 19
vice
mada
|
|
|
|
1
Round 18
seb
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
4
|
0
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
3
Round 7
yay
vice
Round 18
mada
b0i
Round 20
vice
seb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
0
|
0
|
b0i
ABX
|
|
2
Round 8
Asuna
Ethan
Round 12
Ethan
Hiko
|
1
Round 14
steel
Ethan
Asuna
|
1
Round 11
Asuna
steel
Ethan
nitr0
|
|
1
Round 11
nitr0
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
2
|
0
|
yay
ABX
|
|
1
Round 3
steel
Hiko
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
1
|
0
|
vice
ABX
|
|
1
Round 1
Asuna
steel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
2
|
0
|
seb
ABX
|
|
2
Round 9
Asuna
steel
Round 18
Ethan
Asuna
|
1
Round 13
steel
Hiko
nitr0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
1
|
0
|
mada
ABX
|
|
2
Round 3
Ethan
nitr0
Round 8
steel
steel
|
|
1
Round 10
Asuna
Ethan
steel
Hiko
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
0
|
0
|
vice
ABX
|
mada
ABX
|
b0i
ABX
|
yay
ABX
|
seb
ABX
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
3
4
-1
|
3
2
+1
|
5
1
+4
|
4
2
+2
|
2
3
-1
|
steel
100T
|
2
6
-4
|
4
3
+1
|
8
3
+5
|
5
2
+3
|
2
2
+0
|
Asuna
100T
|
4
2
+2
|
5
7
-2
|
1
1
+0
|
1
3
-2
|
4
4
+0
|
nitr0
100T
|
2
3
-1
|
2
6
-4
|
3
2
+1
|
1
2
-1
|
5
5
+0
|
Ethan
100T
|
4
2
+2
|
5
1
+4
|
2
4
-2
|
5
4
+1
|
5
3
+2
|
vice
ABX
|
mada
ABX
|
b0i
ABX
|
yay
ABX
|
seb
ABX
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
steel
100T
|
|
1
0
+1
|
3
0
+3
|
1
1
+0
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
1
0
+1
|
1
2
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
3
1
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
vice
ABX
|
mada
ABX
|
b0i
ABX
|
yay
ABX
|
seb
ABX
|
|
Hiko
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
steel
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hiko
100T
|
|
2
Round 12
yay
vice
Round 15
vice
mada
|
1
Round 19
b0i
vice
yay
|
1
Round 4
mada
yay
seb
b0i
|
|
|
1
Round 19
yay
vice
|
|
|
|
90
|
2
|
3
|
Asuna
100T
|
|
1
Round 19
mada
seb
|
2
Round 6
vice
mada
seb
Round 22
mada
yay
vice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
1
|
0
|
nitr0
100T
|
|
4
Round 1
yay
b0i
Round 13
mada
seb
Round 15
b0i
seb
Round 21
vice
b0i
|
1
Round 14
vice
mada
seb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
2
|
0
|
steel
100T
|
|
4
Round 5
b0i
seb
Round 8
yay
b0i
Round 17
b0i
yay
Round 20
b0i
vice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
4
|
0
|
Ethan
100T
|
|
5
Round 3
seb
yay
Round 5
yay
vice
Round 7
b0i
seb
Round 17
mada
vice
Round 20
yay
mada
|
2
Round 8
seb
mada
vice
Round 9
seb
vice
mada
|
|
|
1
Round 8
vice
|
1
Round 19
yay
vice
|
|
|
|
62
|
1
|
0
|
b0i
ABX
|
|
2
Round 2
Hiko
steel
Round 3
steel
Ethan
|
1
Round 10
steel
Ethan
nitr0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
0
|
0
|
yay
ABX
|
|
|
1
Round 11
Ethan
steel
nitr0
|
1
Round 6
nitr0
Ethan
Hiko
Asuna
|
|
1
Round 9
Ethan
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
1
|
1
|
vice
ABX
|
|
2
Round 8
steel
Hiko
Round 13
nitr0
steel
|
1
Round 7
steel
Hiko
Ethan
|
1
Round 19
steel
Hiko
nitr0
Ethan
|
|
1
Round 13
steel
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
3
|
1
|
seb
ABX
|
|
2
Round 2
Asuna
Ethan
Round 5
Ethan
nitr0
|
2
Round 1
steel
Hiko
nitr0
Round 22
nitr0
Hiko
Asuna
|
|
|
|
|
1
Round 1
nitr0
steel
Hiko
|
|
|
44
|
1
|
1
|
mada
ABX
|
|
5
Round 4
Asuna
nitr0
Round 8
Asuna
nitr0
Round 14
Asuna
Ethan
Round 18
nitr0
steel
Round 21
nitr0
steel
|
1
Round 9
Asuna
Hiko
nitr0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
0
|
2
|
If BBG took SEN's spot, then why are they playing XSET? XSET should be the fourth highest seed, putting BBG as the 5th highest seed. SEN would've been first. Also, then, wouldn't C9 take GENG's spot? Or V1 take Faze's spot? No. More likely, the tournament organizers either seeded the last four teams randomly, or asked some sort of expert on how he would rank the teams and that's how they did it. Because in terms of seeding, BBG < V1 < C9 < ABX, so that's not how they did it either. It's not something like Game +- either, because then C9B would be the highest seed and be playing XSET.
Here's the official ruleset for Challengers: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iHjosZ2E22vxKIqp6R9TJ7G5HoSo8Mk4/view
The eight (8) teams qualifying into Challengers Week 1 from Qualifier 1 will be seeded by the metrics in the order detailed below (ties in one tier will make the next tier determine seeding):
Everyone is tied on Match Win Percentage, so we look at Map Win Percentage, with Round Win Percentage for tie-break (and pre-tournament seed for NV and C9B):
I feel like with valorants number of rounds and economy there's going to be at least 1 month of a lot of upsets every year. Since the top 10 teams are winning so much that means they're playing more matches. Since the tier 2 teams are all knocked out in the first stage. During the second stage they have like 10 hours of total footage to look over while the tier 1 teams have like 1 hour of footage.