100 Thieves vs. Andbox | Champions Tour North America Stage 2: Challengers 1 | Main Event | Valorant match

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Hiko 100T	1.31 1.30 1.32	222 166 261	18 7 11	/ 10 3 7 /	7 2 5	+8 +4 +4	90% 88% 92%	117 94 133	21% 21% 21%	1 1 0	0 0 0	+1 +1 0
nitr0 100T	1.25 1.55 1.05	249 318 204	18 9 9	/ 14 5 9 /	7 4 3	+4 +4 0	85% 100% 75%	163 188 146	34% 26% 43%	1 1 0	0 0 0	+1 +1 0
steel 100T	1.18 1.67 0.85	276 256 290	17 8 9	/ 12 2 10 /	2 1 1	+5 +6 -1	90% 100% 83%	173 147 191	30% 29% 30%	2 1 1	4 1 3	-2 0 -2
Asuna 100T	1.14 1.10 1.16	233 178 270	17 6 11	/ 13 4 9 /	5 2 3	+4 +2 +2	60% 75% 50%	146 117 165	20% 17% 22%	4 1 3	4 1 3	0 0 0
Ethan 100T	0.87 0.94 0.82	204 156 238	12 5 7	/ 13 5 8 /	6 2 4	-1 0 -1	75% 75% 75%	135 142 130	16% 14% 17%	3 2 1	1 0 1	+2 +2 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Hiko

100T

1.31 1.30 1.32

222 166 261

18 7 11

/ 10 3 7 /

7 2 5

+8 +4 +4

90% 88% 92%

117 94 133

21% 21% 21%

1 1 0

0 0 0

+1 +1 0

nitr0

100T

1.25 1.55 1.05

249 318 204

18 9 9

/ 14 5 9 /

7 4 3

+4 +4 0

85% 100% 75%

163 188 146

34% 26% 43%

1 1 0

0 0 0

+1 +1 0

steel

100T

1.18 1.67 0.85

276 256 290

17 8 9

/ 12 2 10 /

2 1 1

+5 +6 -1

90% 100% 83%

173 147 191

30% 29% 30%

2 1 1

4 1 3

-2 0 -2

Asuna

100T

1.14 1.10 1.16

233 178 270

17 6 11

/ 13 4 9 /

5 2 3

+4 +2 +2

60% 75% 50%

146 117 165

20% 17% 22%

4 1 3

0 0 0

Ethan

100T

0.87 0.94 0.82

204 156 238

12 5 7

/ 13 5 8 /

6 2 4

-1 0 -1

75% 75% 75%

135 142 130

16% 14% 17%

3 2 1

1 0 1

+2 +2 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
b0i ABX	1.08 1.29 0.78	221 198 257	17 10 7	/ 15 7 8 /	3 2 1	+2 +3 -1	70% 67% 75%	120 120 121	32% 25% 41%	2 1 1	0 0 0	+2 +1 +1
seb ABX	1.06 1.09 1.02	198 209 183	13 8 5	/ 14 8 6 /	3 3 0	-1 0 -1	65% 83% 38%	134 146 116	33% 24% 50%	0 0 0	2 2 0	-2 -2 0
mada ABX	0.92 1.44 0.15	237 349 71	15 13 2	/ 18 11 7 /	4 4 0	-3 +2 -5	60% 83% 25%	162 239 46	43% 49% 22%	6 5 1	6 3 3	0 +2 -2
yay ABX	0.70 0.77 0.61	148 165 123	10 7 3	/ 16 9 7 /	2 1 1	-6 -2 -4	55% 58% 50%	93 105 76	25% 21% 33%	1 1 0	0 0 0	+1 +1 0
vice ABX	0.32 0.30 0.35	121 135 101	7 5 2	/ 19 12 7 /	0 0 0	-12 -7 -5	45% 50% 38%	96 102 89	19% 21% 16%	0 0 0	3 0 3	-3 0 -3

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

b0i

ABX

1.08 1.29 0.78

221 198 257

17 10 7

/ 15 7 8 /

3 2 1

+2 +3 -1

70% 67% 75%

120 120 121

32% 25% 41%

2 1 1

0 0 0

+2 +1 +1

seb

ABX

1.06 1.09 1.02

198 209 183

13 8 5

/ 14 8 6 /

3 3 0

-1 0 -1

65% 83% 38%

134 146 116

33% 24% 50%

0 0 0

2 2 0

-2 -2 0

mada

ABX

0.92 1.44 0.15

237 349 71

15 13 2

/ 18 11 7 /

4 4 0

-3 +2 -5

60% 83% 25%

162 239 46

43% 49% 22%

6 5 1

6 3 3

0 +2 -2

yay

ABX

0.70 0.77 0.61

148 165 123

10 7 3

/ 16 9 7 /

2 1 1

-6 -2 -4

55% 58% 50%

93 105 76

25% 21% 33%

1 1 0

0 0 0

+1 +1 0

vice

ABX

0.32 0.30 0.35

121 135 101

7 5 2

/ 19 12 7 /

0 0 0

-12 -7 -5

45% 50% 38%

96 102 89

19% 21% 16%

0 0 0

3 0 3

-3 0 -3

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Hiko 100T	1.37 1.37 1.37	229 222 236	35 16 19	/ 22 11 11 /	18 8 10	+13 +5 +8	83% 70% 95%	142 153 132	23% 31% 19%	2 1 1	0 0 0	+2 +1 +1
steel 100T	1.37 1.09 1.22	266 257 274	38 20 18	/ 28 12 16 /	7 3 4	+10 +8 +2	86% 95% 77%	168 157 178	30% 23% 35%	7 3 4	5 2 3	+2 +1 +1
Ethan 100T	1.14 1.15 1.15	224 209 241	33 17 16	/ 27 15 12 /	13 5 8	+6 +2 +4	79% 70% 86%	142 154 131	21% 26% 16%	10 5 5	2 1 1	+8 +4 +4
nitr0 100T	0.76 1.27 1.03	218 194 238	31 12 19	/ 32 18 14 /	18 10 8	-1 -6 +5	83% 85% 82%	140 128 151	25% 23% 27%	2 1 1	1 1 0	+1 0 +1
Asuna 100T	0.83 0.98 0.91	214 176 247	32 13 19	/ 30 14 16 /	7 4 3	+2 -1 +3	60% 65% 55%	128 130 126	18% 18% 19%	6 2 4	7 4 3	-1 -2 +1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Hiko

100T

1.37 1.37 1.37

229 222 236

35 16 19

/ 22 11 11 /

18 8 10

+13 +5 +8

83% 70% 95%

142 153 132

23% 31% 19%

2 1 1

0 0 0

+2 +1 +1

steel

100T

1.37 1.09 1.22

266 257 274

38 20 18

/ 28 12 16 /

7 3 4

+10 +8 +2

86% 95% 77%

168 157 178

30% 23% 35%

7 3 4

5 2 3

+2 +1 +1

Ethan

100T

1.14 1.15 1.15

224 209 241

33 17 16

/ 27 15 12 /

13 5 8

+6 +2 +4

79% 70% 86%

142 154 131

21% 26% 16%

10 5 5

2 1 1

+8 +4 +4

nitr0

100T

0.76 1.27 1.03

218 194 238

31 12 19

/ 32 18 14 /

18 10 8

-1 -6 +5

83% 85% 82%

140 128 151

25% 23% 27%

2 1 1

1 1 0

+1 0 +1

Asuna

100T

0.83 0.98 0.91

214 176 247

32 13 19

/ 30 14 16 /

7 4 3

+2 -1 +3

60% 65% 55%

128 130 126

18% 18% 19%

6 2 4

7 4 3

-1 -2 +1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
seb ABX	0.86 1.21 1.02	218 156 289	30 14 16	/ 32 18 14 /	8 4 4	-2 -4 +2	69% 68% 70%	129 104 156	30% 29% 31%	0 0 0	4 3 1	-4 -3 -1
mada ABX	1.08 0.84 0.97	245 285 203	34 20 14	/ 37 20 17 /	8 4 4	-3 0 -3	62% 64% 60%	159 185 129	32% 45% 17%	9 5 4	10 6 4	-1 -1 0
vice ABX	0.72 0.81 0.76	161 166 159	24 13 11	/ 34 19 15 /	5 0 5	-10 -6 -4	57% 50% 65%	113 112 113	29% 29% 29%	0 0 0	4 0 4	-4 0 -4
yay ABX	0.58 0.94 0.75	164 139 194	23 10 13	/ 32 18 14 /	8 5 3	-9 -8 -1	57% 55% 60%	104 95 114	30% 26% 33%	4 1 3	4 3 1	0 -2 +2
b0i ABX	0.72 0.72 0.71	184 140 228	28 12 16	/ 34 16 18 /	7 2 5	-6 -4 -2	62% 55% 70%	103 86 123	29% 25% 31%	2 1 1	5 3 2	-3 -2 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

seb

ABX

0.86 1.21 1.02

218 156 289

30 14 16

/ 32 18 14 /

8 4 4

-2 -4 +2

69% 68% 70%

129 104 156

30% 29% 31%

0 0 0

4 3 1

-4 -3 -1

mada

ABX

1.08 0.84 0.97

245 285 203

34 20 14

/ 37 20 17 /

8 4 4

-3 0 -3

62% 64% 60%

159 185 129

32% 45% 17%

9 5 4

10 6 4

-1 -1 0

vice

ABX

0.72 0.81 0.76

161 166 159

24 13 11

/ 34 19 15 /

5 0 5

-10 -6 -4

57% 50% 65%

113 112 113

29% 29% 29%

0 0 0

4 0 4

-4 0 -4

yay

ABX

0.58 0.94 0.75

164 139 194

23 10 13

/ 32 18 14 /

8 5 3

-9 -8 -1

57% 55% 60%

104 95 114

30% 26% 33%

4 1 3

4 3 1

0 -2 +2

b0i

ABX

0.72 0.72 0.71

184 140 228

28 12 16

/ 34 16 18 /

7 2 5

-6 -4 -2

62% 55% 70%

103 86 123

29% 25% 31%

2 1 1

5 3 2

-3 -2 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Hiko 100T	1.42 1.41 1.42	235 260 207	17 9 8	/ 12 8 4 /	11 6 5	+5 +1 +4	77% 58% 100%	165 193 131	25% 36% 15%	1 0 1	0 0 0	+1 0 +1
Ethan 100T	1.40 1.27 1.56	243 244 244	21 12 9	/ 14 10 4 /	7 3 4	+7 +2 +5	82% 67% 100%	148 163 131	26% 38% 15%	7 3 4	1 1 0	+6 +2 +4
steel 100T	1.26 1.16 1.38	256 258 254	21 12 9	/ 16 10 6 /	5 2 3	+5 +2 +3	82% 92% 70%	163 164 162	29% 19% 45%	5 2 3	1 1 0	+4 +1 +3
nitr0 100T	0.82 0.24 1.52	187 111 278	13 3 10	/ 18 13 5 /	11 6 5	-5 -10 +5	82% 75% 90%	120 88 158	19% 19% 20%	1 0 1	1 1 0	0 -1 +1
Asuna 100T	0.70 0.65 0.76	195 175 219	15 7 8	/ 17 10 7 /	2 2 0	-2 -3 +1	59% 58% 60%	111 138 79	16% 18% 12%	2 1 1	3 3 0	-1 -2 +1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Hiko

100T

1.42 1.41 1.42

235 260 207

17 9 8

/ 12 8 4 /

11 6 5

+5 +1 +4

77% 58% 100%

165 193 131

25% 36% 15%

1 0 1

0 0 0

+1 0 +1

Ethan

100T

1.40 1.27 1.56

243 244 244

21 12 9

/ 14 10 4 /

7 3 4

+7 +2 +5

82% 67% 100%

148 163 131

26% 38% 15%

7 3 4

1 1 0

+6 +2 +4

steel

100T

1.26 1.16 1.38

256 258 254

21 12 9

/ 16 10 6 /

5 2 3

+5 +2 +3

82% 92% 70%

163 164 162

29% 19% 45%

5 2 3

1 1 0

+4 +1 +3

nitr0

100T

0.82 0.24 1.52

187 111 278

13 3 10

/ 18 13 5 /

11 6 5

-5 -10 +5

82% 75% 90%

120 88 158

19% 19% 20%

1 0 1

1 1 0

0 -1 +1

Asuna

100T

0.70 0.65 0.76

195 175 219

15 7 8

/ 17 10 7 /

2 2 0

-2 -3 +1

59% 58% 60%

111 138 79

16% 18% 12%

2 1 1

3 3 0

-1 -2 +1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
vice ABX	1.16 1.23 1.11	200 204 199	17 8 9	/ 15 7 8 /	5 0 5	+2 +1 +1	68% 50% 83%	127 124 130	41% 43% 39%	0 0 0	1 0 1	-1 0 -1
mada ABX	1.01 0.64 1.31	253 208 291	19 7 12	/ 19 9 10 /	4 0 4	0 -2 +2	64% 40% 83%	156 121 185	23% 38% 15%	3 0 3	4 3 1	-1 -3 +2
seb ABX	0.99 0.57 1.33	238 92 359	17 6 11	/ 18 10 8 /	5 1 4	-1 -4 +3	73% 50% 92%	125 55 183	28% 44% 25%	0 0 0	2 1 1	-2 -1 -1
yay ABX	0.79 0.36 1.16	180 107 241	13 3 10	/ 16 9 7 /	6 4 2	-3 -6 +3	59% 50% 67%	113 83 139	35% 38% 33%	3 0 3	4 3 1	-1 -3 +2
b0i ABX	0.38 0.04 0.68	146 71 209	11 2 9	/ 19 9 10 /	4 0 4	-8 -7 -1	55% 40% 67%	88 46 124	26% 25% 26%	0 0 0	5 3 2	-5 -3 -2

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

vice

ABX

1.16 1.23 1.11

200 204 199

17 8 9

/ 15 7 8 /

5 0 5

+2 +1 +1

68% 50% 83%

127 124 130

41% 43% 39%

0 0 0

1 0 1

-1 0 -1

mada

ABX

1.01 0.64 1.31

253 208 291

19 7 12

/ 19 9 10 /

4 0 4

0 -2 +2

64% 40% 83%

156 121 185

23% 38% 15%

3 0 3

4 3 1

-1 -3 +2

seb

ABX

0.99 0.57 1.33

238 92 359

17 6 11

/ 18 10 8 /

5 1 4

-1 -4 +3

73% 50% 92%

125 55 183

28% 44% 25%

0 0 0

2 1 1

-2 -1 -1

yay

ABX

0.79 0.36 1.16

180 107 241

13 3 10

/ 16 9 7 /

6 4 2

-3 -6 +3

59% 50% 67%

113 83 139

35% 38% 33%

3 0 3

4 3 1

-1 -3 +2

b0i

ABX

0.38 0.04 0.68

146 71 209

11 2 9

/ 19 9 10 /

4 0 4

-8 -7 -1

55% 40% 67%

88 46 124

26% 25% 26%

0 0 0

5 3 2

-5 -3 -2

greedeetv

Frags

–

100T 2-0 with nitr0, Ethan, and Asuna being +40 in kills difference together.

#33

greedeetv

Frags

–

Guess I kind of jinxed those three... lol

#35

beb0p

Frags

–

steel and Hiko pog

#36

interweave

Frags

–

lol who could've expected steel and hiko up top

greedeetv

Frags

–

Also, what the hell is this seeding???!?!?!?
Why is V1 < ABX < C9 < BBG???
How the hell does that make sense????

YOUDOYOU

Frags

–

bbg took sen spot, then c9 andbox and v1 are put into their position by rank

greedeetv

Frags

–

If BBG took SEN's spot, then why are they playing XSET? XSET should be the fourth highest seed, putting BBG as the 5th highest seed. SEN would've been first. Also, then, wouldn't C9 take GENG's spot? Or V1 take Faze's spot? No. More likely, the tournament organizers either seeded the last four teams randomly, or asked some sort of expert on how he would rank the teams and that's how they did it. Because in terms of seeding, BBG < V1 < C9 < ABX, so that's not how they did it either. It's not something like Game +- either, because then C9B would be the highest seed and be playing XSET.

#10

Deathsnacks

Frags

–

Here's the official ruleset for Challengers: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iHjosZ2E22vxKIqp6R9TJ7G5HoSo8Mk4/view

The eight (8) teams qualifying into Challengers Week 1 from Qualifier 1 will be seeded by the metrics in the order detailed below (ties in one tier will make the next tier determine seeding):

Match Win Percentage throughout Qualifier 1
Map Win Percentage throughout Qualifier 1
Round Win Percentage throughout Qualifier 1
Pre-Tournament Seed

Everyone is tied on Match Win Percentage, so we look at Map Win Percentage, with Round Win Percentage for tie-break (and pre-tournament seed for NV and C9B):

100T: 8-0 (104-37)
XSET: 8-0 (104-47)
NV: 8-1 (113-52 - 68.48%) (Open Qualifier seed 4)
C9B: 8-1 (113-52 - 68.48%) (Open Qualifier seed 14)
IMT: 8-1 (108-50 - 68.35%)
V1: 8-1 (114-83 - 57.87%)
BBG: 8-2
ANDBOX: 8-3

#11

greedeetv

Frags

–

Thanks, very helpful!

thebrownlegend

-11

Frags

–

100T 2-0. Andbox should not even be here. Open qualifiers brackets are so bad

plas

Frags

–

it wasnt the bracket, its the fact that teams got upset because if LG didnt get upset then LG would probably have this spot

greedeetv

Frags

–

Probably. Also ABX have experience against Noble, something LG didn't have.

HackNaija

-19

Frags

–

Hiko is an idiot, therefore they will lose. Ez andbox 2-0 with hiko 5-13 both maps

#26

Wraith

Frags

–

This will age will

#37

JaKeBroChill

Frags

–

Nailed it.

NSG_Observer_2

Frags

–

Free 2-0 for 100t how do they get such lucky teams to face

#12

FordTom

Frags

–

idk man, out of those teams the only one that poses more of a threat to 100t than ABX is NV, and I'd rather see those 2 fight in the finals than right at the start

#15

kimosion

Frags

–

This matchup should be good for 100T but they're staring down Immortals in the next round, with Rossy playing out of his mind on Astra they're a real threat. Also they're the number 1 seed so it makes sense they got an easy first round matchup.

#13

BluWasTaken

Frags

–

I don't see how andbox can pull a win unless 100t shits the bed and yay goes crazy

#21

Sp00kydonuts

-1

Frags

–

#22

beb0p

Frags

–

that’s not enough tho

#14

swaglord69

Frags

–

this is an ez 2-0 for 100T

#16

alexzoid

Frags

–

i'm a hiko fanboy so 100T 2-0

#17

itsmedavidjones

Frags

–

2-0 100T steals it

#18

beb0p

Frags

–

yes 2-0, but a “steal”? nah bro, this is free

#19

greedeetv

Frags

–

I think he meant "steel" ;)

#20

fatedhate

Frags

–

I feel like with valorants number of rounds and economy there's going to be at least 1 month of a lot of upsets every year. Since the top 10 teams are winning so much that means they're playing more matches. Since the tier 2 teams are all knocked out in the first stage. During the second stage they have like 10 hours of total footage to look over while the tier 1 teams have like 1 hour of footage.

#23

raka_gg

Frags

–

$1000 on 100T easiest 200 bucks profit of my life 😁

#25

hekzy

Frags

–

There is betting?

#24

dense

Frags

–

100T is probably going to win this and the tournament

#27

911

Frags

–

lets go 100T lets go nıtr0 <3

#28

beb0p

Frags

–

LETS GO 100THIEVEZ

#29

STRAWHAT

Frags

–

100T with the dub 2-0

#30

arcvlr

Frags

–

2 ez for 100T

#31

eaSin

Frags

–

Ethan with 10 opening kills this series as a Sage. What a beast

#32

beb0p

Frags

–

GGEZ 4 GOD HIKO

#34

Caliburn0723

Frags

–

hiko and steel are on point today, good to see hiko not baiting as much and taking duels regularly. Allround performance and team synergy, gg andbox, played very good but not good enough.