I still love prx and everything about them, and they will be my #1 until they disband in the far future. But i also want to root for a 2nd team in a different region, who should i root for? I was thinking leviatan but i dont really want to support onur, suggestions?
0
2nd team to root for
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
YvngKurry [#6]Why would you not support lev over the coach’s polticsl views. I don’t agree with his views either but if you put that aside you cannot deny Onur is a fantastic coach and lev is a great team.
Thats fair, do the players have much of a personality? They seem nice but their are plenty of likeable teams
Kindler [#7]100T if you want to support a team in another region, if not then boom is the best!
My support of prx extends to all of apac, im more looking for a team in a different region
Sushi_ [#8]Thats fair, do the players have much of a personality? They seem nice but their are plenty of likeable teams
I personally think they are super humble. Sure they don’t have a unique personality but I’m a huge fan of their gameplay. It’s almost flawless imo.
YvngKurry [#10]I personally think they are super humble. Sure they don’t have a unique personality but I’m a huge fan of their gameplay. It’s almost flawless imo.
They certainly looked great against prx, rn im leaning towards them but i wanna see what other people say first
Sushi_ [#9]My support of prx extends to all of apac, im more looking for a team in a different region
Then 100t is the best.
Before anything, it's only to further inform people
But, Onur was actually looked at for coaching LOUD, before it got given to bzka, Source: https://www.dexerto.com/valorant/valorant-coach-onur-accuses-loud-of-discrimination-in-roster-announcement-1755424/
We likely won't know why, but if u are looking at Onur personally, he may not "look the best" but neither did Chet saying that xerxia played horribly and that they shouldn't have won at masters, Everyone has bad moments but if u let that define someone then your just as bad as the person who is supposedly so bad. This is due to you reacting over the 1 overly negative thing they did, just like Chet did with xerxia and so did Onur in the dextero post above
The only thing Chet was doing was reacting negatively due to his team not winning when they really should have, same with Onur when loud didn't appreciate him and then dropped him from consideration, So really if u look at Chet and/or Onur negatively for reacting negatively when something didn't go there way when all Onur and Chet wish to do is drive their team to the world stage and success, u are very naive
TL:DR, 1 bad thing does not define a legacy, and if u let it define a legacy of someone, u are either jealous or envious of the player, I'm not accusing anyone here, but if the shoe fits.
bonkbonk [#15]Before anything, it's only to further inform people
But, Onur was actually looked at for coaching LOUD, before it got given to bzka, Source: https://www.dexerto.com/valorant/valorant-coach-onur-accuses-loud-of-discrimination-in-roster-announcement-1755424/
We likely won't know why, but if u are looking at Onur personally, he may not "look the best" but neither did Chet saying that xerxia played horribly and that they shouldn't have won at masters, Everyone has bad moments but if u let that define someone then your just as bad as the person who is supposedly so bad. This is due to you reacting over the 1 overly negative thing they did, just like Chet did with xerxia and so did Onur in the dextero post above
The only thing Chet was doing was reacting negatively due to his team not winning when they really should have, same with Onur when loud didn't appreciate him and then dropped him from consideration, So really if u look at Chet and/or Onur negatively for reacting negatively when something didn't go there way when all Onur and Chet wish to do is drive their team to the world stage and success, u are very naive
TL:DR, 1 bad thing does not define a legacy, and if u let it define a legacy of someone, u are either jealous or envious of the player, I'm not accusing anyone here, but if the shoe fits.
W post
bonkbonk [#15]Before anything, it's only to further inform people
But, Onur was actually looked at for coaching LOUD, before it got given to bzka, Source: https://www.dexerto.com/valorant/valorant-coach-onur-accuses-loud-of-discrimination-in-roster-announcement-1755424/
We likely won't know why, but if u are looking at Onur personally, he may not "look the best" but neither did Chet saying that xerxia played horribly and that they shouldn't have won at masters, Everyone has bad moments but if u let that define someone then your just as bad as the person who is supposedly so bad. This is due to you reacting over the 1 overly negative thing they did, just like Chet did with xerxia and so did Onur in the dextero post above
The only thing Chet was doing was reacting negatively due to his team not winning when they really should have, same with Onur when loud didn't appreciate him and then dropped him from consideration, So really if u look at Chet and/or Onur negatively for reacting negatively when something didn't go there way when all Onur and Chet wish to do is drive their team to the world stage and success, u are very naive
TL:DR, 1 bad thing does not define a legacy, and if u let it define a legacy of someone, u are either jealous or envious of the player, I'm not accusing anyone here, but if the shoe fits.
There's a difference between putting other people in danger by not getting vaxxed and calling a team "cringe"
bonkbonk [#15]Before anything, it's only to further inform people
But, Onur was actually looked at for coaching LOUD, before it got given to bzka, Source: https://www.dexerto.com/valorant/valorant-coach-onur-accuses-loud-of-discrimination-in-roster-announcement-1755424/
We likely won't know why, but if u are looking at Onur personally, he may not "look the best" but neither did Chet saying that xerxia played horribly and that they shouldn't have won at masters, Everyone has bad moments but if u let that define someone then your just as bad as the person who is supposedly so bad. This is due to you reacting over the 1 overly negative thing they did, just like Chet did with xerxia and so did Onur in the dextero post above
The only thing Chet was doing was reacting negatively due to his team not winning when they really should have, same with Onur when loud didn't appreciate him and then dropped him from consideration, So really if u look at Chet and/or Onur negatively for reacting negatively when something didn't go there way when all Onur and Chet wish to do is drive their team to the world stage and success, u are very naive
TL:DR, 1 bad thing does not define a legacy, and if u let it define a legacy of someone, u are either jealous or envious of the player, I'm not accusing anyone here, but if the shoe fits.
I wasnt referring to whatever happened with loud, i had no idea he had coached any team beside kru before levi, i was referring to his opinion on vaccination, tho someone else already pointed out that i can look past that
Sushi_ [#18]I wasnt referring to whatever happened with loud, i had no idea he had coached any team beside kru before levi, i was referring to his opinion on vaccination, tho someone else already pointed out that i can look past that
Yeah, I know but what i am showing is, "Would u like to be judged for purely and solely that 1 crime u did in primary school as a misguided teenager" Ofc u wouldn't, it's not who u are, and the circumstances here are arguing that he doesn't have character, not that he isn't a good coach, some people morally aren't good people, but if they are good at their job, they are good at their job and u can't deny that. Ofc it's also your choice to support or not support someone moral/immoral, that's your choice as well, i just find not supporting someone because of 1 character is kind of naive and off 1 thing as well, but it's your choice.
bonkbonk [#21]Yeah, I know but what i am showing is, "Would u like to be judged for purely and solely that 1 crime u did in primary school as a misguided teenager" Ofc u wouldn't, it's not who u are, and the circumstances here are arguing that he doesn't have character, not that he isn't a good coach, some people morally aren't good people, but if they are good at their job, they are good at their job and u can't deny that. Ofc it's also your choice to support or not support someone moral/immoral, that's your choice as well, i just find not supporting someone because of 1 character is kind of naive and off 1 thing as well, but it's your choice.
i understand what your saying, and im already probably gonna root for lev, though id also like to say that refusing to get vaxxed isnt the type of thing you should trivialize as a "crime u did in primary school as a misguided teenager" its making the decision to endanger everyone around you. But i wont pretend he isnt an amazing coach and the rest of levi seem like likeable personalities
Sushi_ [#23]i understand what your saying, and im already probably gonna root for lev, though id also like to say that refusing to get vaxxed isnt the type of thing you should trivialize as a "crime u did in primary school as a misguided teenager" its making the decision to endanger everyone around you. But i wont pretend he isnt an amazing coach and the rest of levi seem like likeable personalities
"id also like to say that refusing to get vaxxed isnt the type of thing you should trivialize as a "crime u did in primary school as a misguided teenager" its making the decision to endanger everyone around you."
Fair enough, I have no argument for this other than it was a terribly analogy put up on the spot
bonkbonk [#24]"id also like to say that refusing to get vaxxed isnt the type of thing you should trivialize as a "crime u did in primary school as a misguided teenager" its making the decision to endanger everyone around you."
Fair enough, I have no argument for this other than it was a terribly analogy put up on the spot
respect for owning up, everyone makes a few bad takes in their time on this site and you seem well composed for the most part
bonkbonk [#15]Before anything, it's only to further inform people
But, Onur was actually looked at for coaching LOUD, before it got given to bzka, Source: https://www.dexerto.com/valorant/valorant-coach-onur-accuses-loud-of-discrimination-in-roster-announcement-1755424/
We likely won't know why, but if u are looking at Onur personally, he may not "look the best" but neither did Chet saying that xerxia played horribly and that they shouldn't have won at masters, Everyone has bad moments but if u let that define someone then your just as bad as the person who is supposedly so bad. This is due to you reacting over the 1 overly negative thing they did, just like Chet did with xerxia and so did Onur in the dextero post above
The only thing Chet was doing was reacting negatively due to his team not winning when they really should have, same with Onur when loud didn't appreciate him and then dropped him from consideration, So really if u look at Chet and/or Onur negatively for reacting negatively when something didn't go there way when all Onur and Chet wish to do is drive their team to the world stage and success, u are very naive
TL:DR, 1 bad thing does not define a legacy, and if u let it define a legacy of someone, u are either jealous or envious of the player, I'm not accusing anyone here, but if the shoe fits.
I only dont support Onur because he is bald
Discord