100 Thieves vs Sentinels
completed
... 135 more matches
Tuesday, February 23rd
3:00 PM EST
Patch 2.02
Running accuracy changes
Betting
Anonymous Betting & Instant Crypto Withdrawals
Ended
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
Streams
VODs
Maps/Stats
0
Envy
0 /
0
TBD
-
Sentinels
0 /
0
0
NV 
SEN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
|
/ / |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
|
/ / |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
383 206 | 53 25 28 | / 19 12 7 / | 12 7 5 | +34 +13 +21 | 231 113 | 17% 19% 15% | 5 1 4 | 5 1 4 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
243 108 | 30 18 12 | / 26 15 11 / | 15 11 4 | +4 +3 +1 | 152 63 | 22% 19% 26% | 6 3 3 | 5 3 2 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
216 98 | 28 17 11 | / 21 13 8 / | 16 8 8 | +7 +4 +3 | 119 44 | 22% 15% 39% | 5 2 3 | 3 2 1 | +2 0 +2 | |||
|
193 78 | 26 17 9 | / 25 18 7 / | 9 2 7 | +1 -1 +2 | 131 52 | 26% 29% 23% | 5 4 1 | 4 1 3 | +1 +3 -2 | |||
|
162 88 | 23 11 12 | / 25 15 10 / | 11 6 5 | -2 -4 +2 | 105 51 | 16% 23% 8% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
213 158 | 26 6 20 | / 34 16 18 / | 14 9 5 | -8 -10 +2 | 145 98 | 30% 42% 24% | 6 2 4 | 7 2 5 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
198 134 | 25 8 17 | / 31 14 17 / | 8 4 4 | -6 -6 0 | 130 86 | 19% 16% 21% | 2 1 1 | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
|
182 125 | 19 6 13 | / 34 16 18 / | 13 7 6 | -15 -10 -5 | 115 77 | 11% 17% 9% | 2 1 1 | 8 2 6 | -6 -1 -5 | |||
|
|
182 113 | 25 9 16 | / 31 13 18 / | 5 1 4 | -6 -4 -2 | 112 69 | 13% 10% 16% | 5 0 5 | 3 0 3 | +2 0 +2 | |||
|
|
158 78 | 20 13 7 | / 30 14 16 / | 12 3 9 | -10 -1 -9 | 93 36 | 17% 20% 14% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 |
13
Envy
10 /
3
Haven
PICK
39:33
Sentinels
2 /
7
9
NV
SEN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
354 246 | 26 9 17 | / 12 7 5 / | 9 4 5 | +14 +2 +12 | 233 154 | 21% 21% 21% | 3 1 2 | 5 1 4 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
|
252 166 | 18 6 12 | / 17 9 8 / | 8 5 3 | +1 -3 +4 | 156 101 | 26% 26% 27% | 4 1 3 | 3 2 1 | +1 -1 +2 | |||
|
|
200 102 | 17 9 8 | / 15 10 5 / | 5 2 3 | +2 -1 +3 | 124 62 | 35% 39% 32% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
|
188 130 | 14 4 10 | / 14 8 6 / | 7 3 4 | 0 -4 +4 | 128 82 | 12% 17% 9% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
|
182 118 | 14 7 7 | / 16 9 7 / | 10 3 7 | -2 -2 0 | 106 63 | 26% 17% 35% | 1 0 1 | 3 2 1 | -2 -2 0 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
280 175 | 20 6 14 | / 19 12 7 / | 8 6 2 | +1 -6 +7 | 178 107 | 35% 48% 26% | 5 2 3 | 4 1 3 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
|
204 130 | 15 4 11 | / 17 10 7 / | 3 1 2 | -2 -6 +4 | 127 74 | 14% 15% 14% | 4 0 4 | 0 0 0 | +4 0 +4 | |||
|
|
185 111 | 12 4 8 | / 20 12 8 / | 9 5 4 | -8 -8 0 | 106 54 | 13% 24% 5% | 1 1 0 | 4 1 3 | -3 0 -3 | |||
|
|
181 91 | 14 7 7 | / 18 10 8 / | 3 1 2 | -4 -3 -1 | 114 53 | 15% 16% 14% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 | |||
|
|
175 51 | 13 10 3 | / 15 10 5 / | 8 1 7 | -2 0 -2 | 107 22 | 21% 24% 14% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 |
13
Envy
10 /
3
Bind
PICK
29:27
Sentinels
2 /
1
3
NV
SEN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
411 152 | 27 16 11 | / 7 5 2 / | 3 3 0 | +20 +11 +9 | 229 56 | 13% 18% 3% | 2 0 2 | 0 0 0 | +2 0 +2 | |||
|
|
249 69 | 14 10 4 | / 5 4 1 / | 6 5 1 | +9 +6 +3 | 138 18 | 19% 13% 60% | 4 2 2 | 0 0 0 | +4 +2 +2 | |||
|
|
233 28 | 12 12 0 | / 9 6 3 / | 7 6 1 | +3 +6 -3 | 147 10 | 16% 15% 25% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |||
|
|
186 45 | 9 8 1 | / 10 8 2 / | 4 0 4 | -1 0 -1 | 139 37 | 18% 22% 11% | 3 3 0 | 3 1 2 | 0 +2 -2 | |||
|
|
136 29 | 9 7 2 | / 11 7 4 / | 4 3 1 | -2 0 -2 | 74 9 | 23% 30% 0% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 |
| R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
215 193 | 11 1 10 | / 13 4 9 / | 5 3 2 | -2 -3 +1 | 152 131 | 24% 14% 26% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
|
179 145 | 7 2 5 | / 14 4 10 / | 4 2 2 | -7 -2 -5 | 127 109 | 10% 6% 11% | 1 0 1 | 4 1 3 | -3 -1 -2 | |||
|
|
160 90 | 10 5 5 | / 14 3 11 / | 2 0 2 | -4 +2 -6 | 92 62 | 12% 4% 22% | 1 0 1 | 3 0 3 | -2 0 -2 | |||
|
|
145 134 | 6 0 6 | / 15 4 11 / | 6 3 3 | -9 -4 -5 | 100 86 | 21% 17% 21% | 1 0 1 | 3 1 2 | -2 -1 -1 | |||
|
|
141 115 | 7 3 4 | / 15 4 11 / | 4 2 2 | -8 -1 -7 | 72 55 | 12% 9% 13% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 |
Head-to-head
Past Matches
raka_gg [#2]I just got off the phone with SicK, he told me SEN wins 3-2 tough match
i just got off the phone with your mom :joy:
raka_gg [#2]I just got off the phone with SicK, he told me SEN wins 3-2 tough match
Sinatraa called he said das cap
I'm gonna say this is gonna be a Sen 3-2. I think Envy is the better team right now and want Envy to win but whenever Sen loses, there's a fire ignites and they just pop off like they did against 100T. Plus look at when they lost to IMT in Challengers 1, the next time they saw them they 3-1'd them even with the IMT map advantage. With that being said, I still think Envy will win a map and could 100% win this but I just think Sen is too damn good after they lose and they're gonna want revenge.
raka_gg [#5]15 year old spotted
Go back to fortnite you silly glue sniffer
That's what your mum said when you were born XDDD
FIreFistOM [#15]So envy gets a free win due to map advantage? That's so bad format
why do you think that they gets a free win against SEN?)
Statistically, SEN should win this. But, based on similar data, they should've won the last series too.
NV look very good on Bind, but we have only seen SEN play Bind once in the last month (I think), and they won it too.
NV also do better on Icebox overall, winning 83% of their maps against SEN's 63%.
Over their past 5 games, NV have show a statistical advantage over SEN on DEF - winning 68% of defensive halves to SEN's 64%. But that advantage reverses on ATK - SEN taking 64% to NV's 63%. Honestly, these differences are negligible - in reality, NV have literally won 1 more map that SEN over the past month. Not really much to go on.
As a team, SEN put up better avr. clutches, multikills & esr. Where NV have one of the highest avr headshot% of any team in teir 1 NA. SEN also have roughly 600 played rounds more than this NV roster, so experience is also on their side.
Individual player stats favour SEN across the board. Comparing their last five games, SEN put out better averages in player ratings, acs, k/d & adr. Their 'all-time' player stats tell a similar story.
TL:DR: Basically, this is a very nerdy way of saying SEN should win. But, NV know how to upset SEN fans.
Gratisfaction [#16]why do you think that they gets a free win against SEN?)
First map is map advantage so envy gets a free win .. since they didnt lose a single match and qualified for finals from winner's bracket... And sentinels lost a match and qualified from loser's bracket , envy is given a map advantage that means they won a free round... So they have to win 2 maps to win finals where as sentinels have to win 3 maps to win finals
can10combr [#18]I don't understand this format. ENVY has 1 map to win freely, but will they choose which one is that? If so, if they have a free win on ICEBOX, then they got this. If pick-pick-pick-pick and the rest is ENVY's free win, then it should be closer.
Or maybe sentinel has right to ban 1 map and that map is given as a free win to envy
FIreFistOM [#19]First map is map advantage so envy gets a free win .. since they didnt lose a single match and qualified for finals from winner's bracket... And sentinels lost a match and qualified from loser's bracket , envy is given a map advantage that means they won a free round... So they have to win 2 maps to win finals where as sentinels have to win 3 maps to win finals
Once again, you have to reward a team for not losing in a double elimination tournament and playing 2 BO5s(assuming if Envy lost) would be exhausting for the players. How else should Envy get an advantage if not given a map? They haven't lost in this double elimination tournament and now they can get eliminated after losing just 1 series so they have to get an advantage somehow or else it's not fair at all for Envy.
FIreFistOM [#20]Or maybe sentinel has right to ban 1 map and that map is given as a free win to envy
Another option ofc. We need someone to enlight us, my bets are waiting :)
PoPanda [#17]Statistically, SEN should win this. But, based on similar data, they should've won the last series too.
NV look very good on Bind, but we have only seen SEN play Bind once in the last month (I think), and they won it too.
NV also do better on Icebox overall, winning 83% of their maps against SEN's 63%.
Over their past 5 games, NV have show a statistical advantage over SEN on DEF - winning 68% of defensive halves to SEN's 64%. But that advantage reverses on ATK - SEN taking 64% to NV's 63%. Honestly, these differences are negligible - in reality, NV have literally won 1 more map that SEN over the past month. Not really much to go on.
As a team, SEN put up better avr. clutches, multikills & esr. Where NV have one of the highest avr headshot% of any team in teir 1 NA. SEN also have roughly 600 played rounds more than this NV roster, so experience is also on their side.
Individual player stats favour SEN across the board. Comparing their last five games, SEN put out better averages in player ratings, acs, k/d & adr. Their 'all-time' player stats tell a similar story.
TL:DR: Basically, this is a very nerdy way of saying SEN should win. But, NV know how to upset SEN fans.
This statistical analysis is flawed by a little bit -- you have to look at the maps comparatively. I'd say there's about a 75-25 chance for SEN to win Haven and NV to win Bind. Icebox is like 60-40 for SEN and Ascent is like 60-40 for NV, but Split is around 50-50 for this matchup I'd say. Now this means because of the map disadvantage, Sentinels would have to win either Bind or Ascent, Split, Icebox, Haven. I'd say it'll be challenging for them to win, but they definitely stand a chance, especially on Ascent. We'll see though. Assuming SEN get first map pick, the maps should go: Icebox, Ascent, Split, Bind. So also assuming Bind is a no-go for Sentinels, they'd have to win Icebox, then Ascent, then Split back to back to back which is challenging for any team, especially against the best of the best.
greedeetv [#23]This statistical analysis is flawed by a little bit -- you have to look at the maps comparatively. I'd say there's about a 75-25 chance for SEN to win Haven and NV to win Bind. Icebox is like 60-40 for SEN and Ascent is like 60-40 for NV, but Split is around 50-50 for this matchup I'd say. Now this means because of the map disadvantage, Sentinels would have to win either Bind or Ascent, Split, Icebox, Haven. I'd say it'll be challenging for them to win, but they definitely stand a chance, especially on Ascent. We'll see though. Assuming SEN get first map pick, the maps should go: Icebox, Ascent, Split, Bind. So also assuming Bind is a no-go for Sentinels, they'd have to win Icebox, then Ascent, then Split back to back to back which is challenging for any team, especially against the best of the best.
This is a really good point. I've not found a great way to use the data to compare two teams chances against each other on any one map. Also, i'm not very smart.
So far, i've only found reliable statistics to compare teams on a much broader scale.
Truth be told, I want NV to win so bad. So I hope you're right with this!
it will be interesting to see who wins considering the fact that you could argue that envy should have had a clean 2-0 the last time they played but just choked the second map. Envy seemed to have a great idea on how to counter sentinels so I am interested to see how Shazam and FNS prepare for the finals. However, since they already made masters, the motivation to win will not be as high IMO because this will just be for seeding in Masters. but it should still be very fun to watch.
CurryCooker [#26]it will be interesting to see who wins considering the fact that you could argue that envy should have had a clean 2-0 the last time they played but just choked the second map. Envy seemed to have a great idea on how to counter sentinels so I am interested to see how Shazam and FNS prepare for the finals. However, since they already made masters, the motivation to win will not be as high IMO because this will just be for seeding in Masters. but it should still be very fun to watch.
10k$ motivation maybe? xd
CurryCooker [#26]it will be interesting to see who wins considering the fact that you could argue that envy should have had a clean 2-0 the last time they played but just choked the second map. Envy seemed to have a great idea on how to counter sentinels so I am interested to see how Shazam and FNS prepare for the finals. However, since they already made masters, the motivation to win will not be as high IMO because this will just be for seeding in Masters. but it should still be very fun to watch.
Seeding could be the difference between winning and losing. Example, as Sentinels I'd much rather play NRG or GenG than 100T.
Fat_Lard [#37]Okay so I missed map 1... How tf did Envy beat them on Haven?
Sentinels playingg like utter shite
FIreFistOM [#43]Lol sentinels shot more bullets on dead body that alive members of NV
sean destoyred with those words
Heavon [#52]Sentinels was starving and it was rude for nV to tease food infront of their faces but not let them have it.
Greatest post ever
Heavon [#52]Sentinels was starving and it was rude for nV to tease food infront of their faces but not let them have it.
fr nv utilized food so well this match
Food skilled player but that is not normally, This very very insane....They need to check him pc and game.....Maybe he not cheating but maybe he using the game deficit ...and this cant seem on game screen..He needs to check-up....Day0s Radiant Cheater with Streaming.....I think day0s still cheating...food using game deficit on PRO scene ,ON BIG Events.Maybe everyone dont knows him trick.He incredible....I want to ask his where is the comming of your skill's ?
Philosopher_Stone [#55]Food skilled player but that is not normally, This very very insane....They need to check him pc and game.....Maybe he not cheating but maybe he using the game deficit ...and this cant seem on game screen..He needs to check-up....Day0s Radiant Cheater with Streaming.....I think day0s still cheating...food using game deficit on PRO scene ,ON BIG Events.Maybe everyone dont knows him trick.He incredible....I want to ask his where is the comming of your skill's ?
Yes. Game shark
Tyranitar [#59]Sen had a bad day obviously but they were never gonna come back from envy who sent them to lower bracket. But people out here saying there trash weirdchamp
It's funny how some fans are saying "they're Sen's kryptonite" after saying "there's no chance they win, we won 7-0 of our matches so far".
ValdemieGC [#60]Didn't watch. Did SEN throw?
No, they didn't, just Envy was way better than Sentinels
sport2793 [#7]Two best teams in NA with 100T dropping off. Will be an interesting match.
oh no no no he doesn't know
ValdemieGC [#60]Didn't watch. Did SEN throw?
Sen didnt throw envy just didnt give them chance to do anything not even throw
can10combr [#67]Envy knew they gonna win, Sentinels knew they gonna lose. Such a time waste for us. Hope everythings will be different in Masters.
can't expect much from a team who didn't scrim for 10 days, with no normal food, water, or electricity. and u can expect them to beat a red hot Envy team. u just can't
Slotthyduke [#70]can't expect much from a team who didn't scrim for 10 days, with no normal food, water, or electricity. and u can expect them to beat a red hot Envy team. u just can't
Hold up... Where does Envy play from? The org itself is from Texas so I would assume the players would also play from Texas... If so, then you can't use that excuse but then again I don't know whether Envy's Valorant team plays from Texas or not.
Fat_Lard [#71]Hold up... Where does Envy play from? The org itself is from Texas so I would assume the players would also play from Texas... If so, then you can't use that excuse but then again I don't know whether Envy's Valorant team plays from Texas or not.
Kaboose in post match interview was in the nv facility, so he was in texas. I think food plays from home in a diff state and fns is a canadian so. Mummay is from NY and not sure about crashies
edit: crashies is in texas so dont think envy would have been able to practice w/o kaboose and crashies
Slotthyduke [#70]can't expect much from a team who didn't scrim for 10 days, with no normal food, water, or electricity. and u can expect them to beat a red hot Envy team. u just can't
No excuses please,lost is lost.
Cheasle2 [#74]Sinatraas last game huh.
He could come back if they find out he is innocent with the investigations
beb0p [#76]He could come back if they find out he is innocent with the investigations
nah his reputation is already destroyed. Even if he's full innocent, no orgs will want him, but he might continue streaming.
swaglord69 [#80]Channel this energy for tomorrow envy🙏
this is the old SEN, with TenZ they won't be beaten by Envy
Chunkio [#82]how did you know?
first comment in 3 weeks and is digging up a old thread? Damn BBG down bad
can10combr [#18]I don't understand this format. ENVY has 1 map to win freely, but will they choose which one is that? If so, if they have a free win on ICEBOX, then they got this. If pick-pick-pick-pick and the rest is ENVY's free win, then it should be closer.
Then dont
This thread has been locked.
Discord