As defined in a US patent by Riot circa 2022.
Figure 3
Explanation 300.
Micro-checkmate disbelievers.
| Flag: | United States |
| Registered: | February 20, 2024 |
| Last post: | November 23, 2025 at 7:19 PM |
| Posts: | 1382 |
As defined in a US patent by Riot circa 2022.
Figure 3
Explanation 300.
Micro-checkmate disbelievers.
two hands curated... about to change the game.
You have been warned. beep boop.
Well now I feel bad...
https://x.com/AnderzzTV/status/1978212295307329748
Yal win... I've been micro-checkmated... get this man a job in VCT.
"all good. yourer very funny and you make this site better"
Also you are valued. You're my second favorite person on vlr.
This is how you create engagement Aayan... not "bump" x100.
Why nitpick so much, man?
A. Entertainment
B. Cult of Personality in Valorant (ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_personality)
C. His roast of the devs failed spectacularly
D. All of the above
E. None of the above
Choose carefully.
"who is bro talking to"
"your mother should strike you"
The irony of you of all people saying this... <3
Did you end up finding a treatment place or nah?
Someday, they will appreciate the work I put in for them. Gotta keep the people entertained :)
"sorry i realize i used too many words for you. I am calling you delusional and a hypocrite hope this helps"
I can help you meet crashies if you want... You seemed REALLY interested in him.
"i think the haters know theyre trolling and just dont like it or dont think its funny... haters and bandwagon fans are both equally trash and annoying"
LOL... I knew you would come through for me cult of personality follower. Cloudberry is club president.
"There was a developer meeting recently, where they said they want their maps to feel like chess boards and I would argue that a lot of the maps feel like checkers boards where your pieces are very limited."
Plain hearing/reading of what he said... He believes chess boards and checkers boards are different. He believes chess pieces are not limited in their movement.
You are:
A: Adding context
B: Not listening
C: All of the above
So 1000% that last bit of "maybe you don't either." is you. Thank you... I was starting to lose hope. But you are my fav.
sorry, last one..
What's on the second monitor fam?
https://imgur.com/a/GhD6mlI
Also ain't no way you're out here doing comparisons with this youtube channel fam...
Webster "Onya" Dictionary over here. Since you enjoy made up words.. I had a friend help me out...
Flumbuzzle (verb) — to utterly confuse someone with enthusiasm and snacks.
“He flumbuzzled the committee with cupcakes and charisma.”
Snorpulent (adjective) — when something looks both comfortable and slightly gross.
“That beanbag chair is weirdly snorpulent, like it’s judging me for sitting on it.”
Blergitude (noun) — the existential meh you feel when your favorite show gets canceled.
“Her blergitude was palpable after the finale.”
Womptastic (adjective) — unexpectedly amazing in a chaotic, unhinged way.
“That karaoke performance was womptastic — I think the smoke alarm joined in.”
Quizzlefied (verb) — the state of being overcomplicated for no reason whatsoever.
“The onboarding process was quizzlefied by six unnecessary PowerPoints.”
Gloobernog (noun) — a mysterious substance found in the back of your fridge that’s possibly evolving.
“Don’t touch the gloobernog, it’s part of an ongoing experiment.”
Minkadoodle (noun) — someone who’s endearingly ridiculous but alarmingly confident.
“That minkadoodle walked into the meeting wearing a cape and owning it.”
Scrumbulate (verb) — to panic-organize your life in 12 minutes before guests arrive.
“We scrumbulated so hard, even the dog looked cleaner.”
Yonderblorp (noun) — a vague destination used when you don’t want to admit you’re lost.
“Let’s just head yonderblorp and see what happens.”
Dingfuddle (noun) — that moment when technology works, but you have no idea why.
“The printer started working after I yelled at it, so that’s a dingfuddle win.”
"yo wtf u saying window licker"
A "stat stick" if you're unfamiliar, is a character or mechanic who lives or dies by its numbers. When it's above X threshold, it's a major problem, when it's below the threshold, it feels painfully under-powered. 🤤🤤🤤
Disappeared in Swiss Stage Round 4, August 18th, 2025 @ 2:00pm. :)
Bruh...
Could you imagine 100 pages of this...
https://x.com/AnderzzTV/status/1975592153309941802
At least I had pictures because let's be real, this community can't read.
Dear Cult of Personality followers,
Sliggy doesn't know how chess and checkers works and maybe you don't either.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kP2ffAkfK9w&t=59s
Anderzz is making up chess terms but that tracks with his content. There is no such thing as a "micro checkmate" and I'm not sure if understands what a "check" is in Chess.
https://x.com/AnderzzTV/status/1975592153309941802
Please, educate your Valorant analyst gods and help them do better.
Love always,
m4
P.S. Chatgpt is an option for check ing your board er line questionable content decisions.
100 Thieves Open Tournament Casting Call.
Overview
The 100 Thieves VALORANT program is hosting an open Invitational Tournament for the 2025 VCT off-season and beyond. Competition will run in two phases—details for Phase 1 (Open Qualifier + Scouting Challenge) are below. Phase 2 (Main Event) will follow for teams that advance.
“We’re building a competition that rewards preparation as much as performance. We want new faces and underdogs in the mix, so we’re keeping the door wide open.” — Anthony “Zikz” Gray
Phase 1: Open Qualifier + Scouting Challenge
A) Match Play (Open Qualifier)
Format: Best-of-1 Swiss into Best-of-3 qualifying rounds.
Bracket: Publicly seeded; seeding influenced by Scouting Challenge submissions (see below).
Map Pool: Current official VCT map pool.
Servers/Regions: NA servers (primary).
Anti-Cheat: Tournament client + mandatory recording.
B) Scouting Challenge (Optional but Influences Seeding)
Submit a brief scouting packet designed as if you’re prepping your team for these hypothetical matchups:
vs. 100 Thieves on Icebox
Present key prep points your team would use before facing 100T on Icebox.
Include stats or relevant data that help you win.
Call out player-type tendencies to target as strengths/weaknesses (generic archetypes OK).
Catalog any set strategies/executions you’d expect to use or counter, with labeled images or diagrams.
vs. Fnatic on Haven
Present key prep points your team would use before facing Fnatic on Haven.
Include stats or relevant data that help you win.
Call out player-type tendencies to target as strengths/weaknesses (generic archetypes OK).
Catalog any set strategies/executions you’d expect to use or counter, with labeled images or diagrams.
Submission specs: PDF or slide deck (max 15 pages total), up to 5 labeled images/diagrams per matchup. Cite sources where applicable.
Phase 2: Main Event
Teams: Top performers from Phase 1.
Format: Double-elimination, Best-of-3; Grand Final Best-of-5.
Broadcast: Select matches broadcast on official channels.
Prize Pool: Announced with Phase 2 schedule.
Registration
Email zikz@100thieves.com
with the subject line “100T Invitational Registration – <Team Name>” and include:
Team Name
Primary Contact (Full Legal Name)
In-Game Names (IGNs) & Riot IDs for all players (5–7)
Ages
Country/Region of Residence
Current Ranks
Coach/Analyst (optional)
Scouting Challenge Attachment(s) (optional but recommended)
Key Dates
Registration & (Optional) Scouting Challenge Due: [Insert Date]
Phase 1 (Open Qualifier): [Insert Date Range]
Phase 2 (Main Event): [Insert Date Range]
Rules & Conduct
Players must meet Riot eligibility requirements and comply with tournament rulebook (distributed upon registration confirmation).
Smurfing, account sharing, or unauthorized software results in disqualification.
Admin rulings are final.
Contact
Questions or special requests? Reach out to zikz@100thieves.com
.
If you’d like, tell me your exact dates, map pool, server rules, and prize pool and I’ll finalize this into a ready-to-publish one-pager or webpage.
That wouldn't matter. Would still take 2 shots beyond 20m so the majority of fights would turn out the same. The outliers would be penetration damage.
nope. you've got a lot of posts about a certain individual. maybe explore your options.
First, you're hurt.
Second, I never gave you advice.
Third, 1.09 kd in a 5 stack, lol.
That's because you have 36 games.
I would try to explain to you the ranked matchmaking system but it would ruin the copium high.
You've got a weird obsession going on in your comment history... just sayin...
no one remembers who used to play a lot with tenz and what happened to said person... its actually has such good ragebait potential. dumpster diving on twitter pre-sgares accusations produced results...
The best part is that the team that was getting util dumped in that clip actually won the round.
professional armchair coach here, def looking forward to it.
yet no one benefitted. free yourself from the shackles of the past... change is better for everyone.
online matches... zzzz
I love 100T punishing the player for the coaching staff's decision to put him on op in the weirdest positions. Cryo is a fantastic rifler and a B tier op'er.
The operator is tests two things, your ability to react and your understanding of the farthest from the angle rule. There's a round that sticks out in my mind where Cryo is solo flanking with the operator on fracture in a vct match. It's a complete misunderstanding of the advantages of the gun and that's on the coaching staff, not Cryo.
Go back in history to when fr0d used to play awp in CS 1.6 and you'll see, if my memory serves me, Storm or some rifler on the team right by his side holding for rushes. You need to pair it with someone as support.
Most popular opinions are wrong. You seemed to have a lot of people in this thread agreeing with you. You should see that as a loss and not a win.
Chatgpt, make vlr like me, improve my criticisms of 100Thieves coaching application...
The Harsh Reality of Esports “Open Calls”
A couple of months ago, Zikz and 100 Thieves announced an open call for coaching positions. I decided to give it everything I had — two full weeks of deep analysis, creating two comprehensive reports breaking down team strategies in detail. I poured an enormous amount of effort into them, going far beyond what most scouting or analysis submissions usually entail.
After submitting, I followed up with Zikz two weeks past the deadline, hoping for any kind of feedback or acknowledgment. Instead, I got silence. Later, I found out that the average VCT scouting report is about one or two pages long — roughly 1/200th the size of what I submitted.
That’s when it hit me: despite all the talk about innovation and dedication to improvement, organizations like 100 Thieves continue to operate under the same system that has held esports back for years — cronyism.
How can a “tactical” game like Valorant be evaluated through one-page scouting reports? How can organizations claim to be doing “everything they can” when meaningful, detailed work goes unnoticed?
At some point, we have to start holding these organizations accountable. If esports wants to evolve beyond being a revolving door for friends-of-friends, it needs to start valuing genuine effort, not just connections.
Can you imagine being top 0.1% in HS but only hitting a .8kd per round? So impressive.
Last GF they were in, EMEA finals to GX, PRX game and this game... statistically insane.
Discord