I mean... this win was pretty convincing... so unless we see V1 absolutely stomp everyone else and do a coveted LB run then I dont think you can really make that argument. 100T was just the better team today, and this win was convincing.
| Flag: | Canada |
| Registered: | May 25, 2021 |
| Last post: | February 6, 2022 at 9:33 PM |
| Posts: | 1087 |
I mean... this win was pretty convincing... so unless we see V1 absolutely stomp everyone else and do a coveted LB run then I dont think you can really make that argument. 100T was just the better team today, and this win was convincing.
I agree with most of what you say except for the '100t split bind' part. Because if you saw the map pools. 100t didnt ban split today, so im p sure they have gotten much b etter on it to the point htey're confident on it. I still think its more likely 100T wins, but it would be a 2-1.
Thats.. not the point. The point is that 100T probably could've done better than V1 at iceland. V1 at iceland was shaky and not solid bc of stand-in who wasnt even tier 1, and now they have a stand-in in thief who's t1 and still lost to 100T. Just saying that a team like 100T thats solid probably could've done better.
Lol, instead of actually trying to come up with something logical you just say bullshit like this. Can you actually state a reason why you think what Im saying is dumb?
Whats so shit about it? Can you explain? This win was pretty convincing... and this is V1 in a state presumably better than at Iceland. And we all know they choked against Nuturn and should've won, if 100T was there, with their solid and stable roster, they could've won. And I dont think theres any question thatt 100T and probably even Envy are better than Liquid?
i mean... we're all seeing it now, other NA teams are catching up just like in EU, bothh regions are extremely competitive, and based on V1's run in Iceland alone i think it can be said that 100T would beat nuturn and liquid. since V1 has a stand-in just like they did in iceland, but this one is arguably better than jammyz because thief is a tier 1 pro with a lot of experience. \
also, of course, this is just hypothetical, but its definitely logical. obviously its not like a 100% confirmed fact, but its most likely 99% that 100T could've done better than V1 at iceland, and probably envy could've done better at iceland too. Its just the fact that v1 had a stand in
Asuna i love u man, ur fucking insane, one of the best duelists in NA, but uhhh I think u might wanna stick to rifling for a bit bc ur OPing is not it...
I really dont wanna talk bad after his 40 bomb but he's kinda missing easy shots with the op...
still much higher ACS, not just frags lmao. And that was important AF too, challengers playoffs >> masters 1 because masters 1 basically the same as playoffs
yeah, totally bro, totally not like he had higher ACS then tenz AND sick in their most recent match-up. Its a fact that Asuna has been getting gradually better, he's significantly much more consistent and skilled at the game then he was in March
THE FUCK ARE THE 3 BOOMERS DOIN GMAN? ASUNA DOING EVERYTHING HE CAN, 30 BOMB, AND ETHAN DOING REALLY GOOD TOO, WHY THE FUCK ARE THE 3 VETERANS DOING SHIT MAN. HARD TOW ATCH AS A 100T FAN
Idk how i feel about this, they didnt ban breeze at all in their qualifier matches, but banning breeze is limiting them tbh and I think it would be a good matchup. But who knows, maybe they practised more on Split. It's just kind of weird to see, just like sentinels playing bind when it used to be their perma ban.
I have friend requests from everyone enabled, add me now
Braindead bait... Fnatic and Liquid WERE the best teams in EU at the time of Iceland. Obviously now we're seeing that the other teams are catching up... Fnatic and Liquid have just become complacent and have not evolved. We'll see the same thing in NA as well probably, and just because FNC doesnt evolve doesnt mean teams like V1 and Sen arent gonna evolve either lmao.
This Region has no Team to loop up to. Every Team in EU is so trash and inconsistant its not even funny to watch the games. I predict EU will be just about playing Challanger and after the LAN Event we will always see Orgs with Money lure the Players from other Teams with Money and get bad again, fail again and do the same shit over and over. We will never have a good team like SEN that makes the scene interesting since in NA everyone is literally waiting for the moment a team beats the unbeatable while we have matches in EU that make no sense. one day you think you have seen the best EU Team and the next day they lose like silvers. Seriously, WTF is this?
FNATIC, LIQUID, G2, FPX, GUILD, BDS, NIP why are you doing this to eachother?
Yeah.... It's definitely me with the superiority complex when you're the one who ignorantly tells me to 'get my facts right' when in fact you didn't have your facts right. Totally not you also claiming that two statements made online on a forum by a random internet persona also tells you how they are as a person in real life LMAO. Genuinely cringe.
I'm not contradicting myself at all. And he mentioned gambit, so I mentioned the playoffs because obviously he referred to the playoffs for gambit. And I mentioned the 2 chances in challengers 1 and challengers 2 for Acend LMAO. You're clearly trying to appear smart when you're not, you seem to be very illiterate. YOU'RE the one who needs to get their facts straight. I addressed both of his parts completely logically but you failed to pick that up due to a lack of basic reading comprehension.
If it were the same format in NA yes sentinels would've been out, but that is not an argument that Acend would've made it all the way, once again. It's possible, but unlikely. Sentinels got fluked by BBG in the OPEN QUALIFIERS for challengers 1, and had they qualified, its 99% likely that they would make it to the playoffs. Sentinels also got fluked by Andbox, but then they made their LB run. So sentinels technically had one chance compared to Acend's two chances if we're trying to talk theoretically.
The factual results I'm talking about, you illiterate yet arrogant monkey, is the fact that Acend had two chances in BOTH challengers but failed both times. Sure NA had a better format, but again, that is not proof or justification of Acend's poor performance when other teams had to go through the same thing.
I'm rooting for them against XSET, they have a decent chance of winning. but after beating xset, they're gonna lose sadly
There was double elim in the EMEA playoffs. And also, acend had 2 chances. They lost in challengers 1 to someone and then to vitality in challengers 2. Its their fault for not being consistent enough to be able to qualify. Fnatic and Liquid were. Its as simple as that, so they were better at that time. You cant claim to know who would've qualified with double elim because its entirely theoretical and doesnt matter, at all, because literally ANYTHING is 'possible', but what matters are the factual results.
Braindead take, completely. They were definitely the best EU team at the time of Iceland. They consistently beat other top EU teams and qualified to Iceland because they were the best. Stop making excuses.
not really, their defence was solid. England couldn't pressure shit tbh, and Kane is a diver. U got lucky with the pen
"I don't think it was an England penalty, but there were two other penalty calls for England which could easily have been given and a goal was looking increasingly likely. England had a lot of excellent chances, you could argue that the shots weren't convincing, but Maguire's header with a finger tip save from Schmeichel, and Sterling's effort saved by the body of Schmeichel are absolute get out of jail saves that would 9 times out of 10 find the back of the net."
nah, not true. the speed of those shots were slow in the first place, and literally CAME to the goalie. It was easy to save.
"nyway, all in all as a neutral, I think it's hard to say England did not deserve to win, but it really could of gone either way."
Exactly. England did not play better. They got lucky with the pen.
nah, skye instead of sage, or another duelist
They should have 2 controllers on bind and 2 duelists. and the last slot goes to sova
This bind comp is not good at all.. i mean, only one controller? and running jett? Wtf.. Stop fucking putting wardell on jett and have him flex for once. Fine on other maps he can play jett, but at least on bind he should flex, like literally every other jett main.
I really hope this is the case as a 100T fan i'd be super sad to see anyone go, none of them are underperforming. sometimes i hate that these types of leaks can fucking happen because it just makes me so worried as a 100T fan. everyone on their roster is just so good and i want to see all 5 of them make it to berlin, not anyone else.
There is something wrong with you mentally if you genuinely believe that you're putting up a good argument right now. Denmark had extremely solid defense the whole game and England failed to barely do anything of importance. You cant even form an argument you dumbass and you say I'm the one who's baiting?
Lol something is wrong with you if you genuinely think thats a valid argument to back up your shitty unproven point.
you didnt play better though, and you werent more dominant. even if u had more ball control it doesnt matter if you cant convert it into goals or actual good shots at getting goals, which you barely had.
i mean, theres no way you're considering germany easy? they're definitely not easy. though i will say italy definitely had a harder path, with belgium and spain. austria is not good
either way, denmark got robbed today, that we can agree on. that was not a pen.
doesnt matter lmao they still got clamped down 99% of the time by Denmarks iron defense, sterling had 2-3 runs down the wings but got clamped again. The only reason you won is that rigged penalty bro, just accept it.
i did, denmarks defense was super good lmao england barely had any chances to score and even when they did, they took basic shots that were easily saved without sweat. You got a rigged penalty and it is the only reason you won. If england didnt get that penalty, they wouldnt have scored again. Otherwise, it would've happened before the penalty obviously
Denmark played better than england tbh u got lucky af for that penalty, this is denmarks win
On the other side of the argument you have to wonder though, even though it SEEMS ridiculous, this is a professional organization, and they even had VAR check with multiple people checking it. So its entirely possible Sterling actually got tripped. But from the common pov from the cameras, it just looks like he's diving
That example isnt what proved you wrong though, it was my entire argument debunking your shitty argument. Either way, the stats were here on vlr from bet.gg. Liquid was the favourite.
LMFAO WHAT WAS THAT PENALTY? THEY DIDNT EVEN TOUCH STERLING
They werent, you dumbass LMAO. The betting odds literally favoured Liquid 1.8 to 1.9 for Fnatic
There is no superiority complex, but its funny that you'd attribute your lack of intelligence and lack of a good argument to a nonexistent thing LMAO. pathetic tbh. Everything I've said in this argument with you has been backed by facts and logic yet none of what you said has been backed by anything but your ass and your emotions.
"to be honest, neither of us are really right here; people probably use a mix of both betting and statistics. go ahead with the "oh now you're changing your argument again" shit. twist it whichever way you want. but either we're both equally wrong or we're both equally right at this point."
No ,definitely not. You're 100% factually wrong, and I'm 100% factually right. IF you deny this, you are delusional. I've already debunked your shitty excuse of an argument. You're the only braindead clown here lmao, you're embarrassing yourself by even thinking you're on the same level as me in this debate which is funny and delusional.
Stats are results, so what? That doesnt change the fact that Split is inherently CT sided lmao. But ok, its obvious that you know you're wrong, so its all good.
No it didnt, at all. They didnt change the fact that the sites are inherently CT sided. They changed a few corners and edges, that doesnt take away from how CT sided it is. B site has 20 million angles, with heaven , rafters, hell, pillar, backsite, CT, etc., and so little space to plant as well. A site has backsite, elbow, ivy, rafters, heaven, ramps, etc. as well. Theres no map in this game that has as many angles as Split in a single site, it is extremely claustrophobic. And no, stats dont back it up, because stats dont change the fact that the DESIGN OF THE MAP is inherently CT sided. Just because teams win on attack doesnt mean anything, its just a lack of good defense. Every map in this game is inherently T/CT sided just based on the map structure. Like breeze is T sided, inherently from map design, and it is backed by stats as well, but stats do not matter.
Discord