dignityx3
Flag: Canada
Registered: May 25, 2021
Last post: February 6, 2022 at 9:33 PM
Posts: 1087
1 •• 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 •• 19

nukkye is so good

posted about 3 years ago

marved has many months of t1 experience and has proven himself as a tier 1 pro. They also have insane team chemistry. He was also a csgo pro and has good game sense, and is not a replaceable asset like dicey, unless they swapped marved for another tier 1 pro. EliGE will likely only replace the fortnite/overwatch pros or just the tier 1 pros who dont have the same game sense from csgo that he possesses

posted about 3 years ago

It's not incorrect at all, its factually true. There is no factual proof that elige will be any good in the pro scene. If you deny this, you are delusional. You can say that its possible, or even likely, but you have no proof at all. And there is no reason for any of these teams to drop any of their players, especially 100T, as all of their players are insane at the game and EliGE wouldnt be better than them. They all have months of t1 experience and understanding at the pro level

posted about 3 years ago

No, they wouldnt, because all of them are already well established valorant pros with insane team chemistry, top 3 NA team. they only opened the spot for Ethan because dicey was replaceable, and not nearly as good as ethan lol. Everyone on that roster is insane and brings huge value to the table. EliGE would not replace any of them, and theres no guarantee that he'd even be an insane tier 1 pro.

posted about 3 years ago

HOLY FUCK MIXWELL ALWAYS COMES IN CLUTCH AT THE BEST TIMES. 30-17 AS VIPER, THIS MAN IS INSANE!

posted about 3 years ago

Keloqz just threw that round

posted about 3 years ago

G2 will only get better by the time of EMEA playoffs. i'd like to see them in berlin.

posted about 3 years ago

technically you could call it that but the game was not nearly as competitive or skilled back then as it is now. plus first strike really wasnt that good, it was single elim and its not nearly as important as these masters tourneys

posted about 3 years ago

doesnt matter, did he win any actual majors? no, even if he is still good at csgo again my point is that that doesnt prove he will be amazing at valorant. but again, it is possible. im just saying not to overvalue him so much.

posted about 3 years ago

You're overestimating his value... there's no guarantee he'll become good at valorant or even a top tier pro. Many teams already have established dynamics and team chemistry, especially the top 4 teams in NA. if any team were to sign him it wouldnt be a top 4 NA team. just because he was decent at csgo doesn't mean he'll be good at valorant eiither. skadoodle was good af at csgo yet isnt that good at valorant, ethan hiko steel nitr0 were all t1 cs pros and they're still really good at valorant, but they havent won anytthing major yet, but might eventually. (sadly, and im saying this as a huge 100T fan, but we're gonna win berlin either way so lets go).

posted about 3 years ago

Yeah babybay wasnt wrong about the part where he said signing bang didnt make sense, but it was still definitely cringe and toxic when he called bang 'bad'. Like bruh you can say that it's not a good move or he doesn't seem like the solution to TSM's problems, but calling him 'bad' makes babybay look like a toxic bitch, which he is honestly. He can't call someone bad when he's one of the most inconsistent jetts in NA, he hasnt gotten out of open qualifiers in 4 months lmao. Other than that, the stuff he said was valid.

posted about 3 years ago

I mean the shit he said isnt wrong.. Dropping drone was not the move, and picking up bang wasnt the move either if they're not even gonna put him on controller...

posted about 3 years ago

Refer to #21

posted about 3 years ago

L + ratio

posted about 3 years ago

L

posted about 3 years ago

-hazed
+oderus
could actually work. we would still need a good IGL though. not that hazed is a good IGL in the first place, he really isnt.

posted about 3 years ago

LMFAO that john cena one was funny

posted about 3 years ago

Relax envy fan, you guys might lose to Gen G here LOL.

posted about 3 years ago

100% agreed.

posted about 3 years ago

yeah honestly. who the fuck expects XSET to beat sentinels, this absolutely fucked my pickems lmao.

posted about 3 years ago

You're reading too deep into it lmao..

posted about 3 years ago

It was a tactical. it literally said that on the screen UI. just because it didnt go grey or whatever doesnt matter, maybe they did it the old-fashioned way or some shit

posted about 3 years ago

Fuck yeah bro

posted about 3 years ago

yeah, i definitely wanna see Envy at the playoffs. hoping they beat Gen G, and tbh, they probably will.

posted about 3 years ago

I'm pretty sure yeah. They didnt call a single one during Iceland

posted about 3 years ago

YESSIRR UR NAME THO LMAO

posted about 3 years ago

This is sentinels's first tac time out against XSET, score 11-12 favouring sentinels. This is nice to see, sentinels finally realizing that tac timeouts are a good and beneficial tool.

posted about 3 years ago

LETS FUCKING GOO HIKO CLUTCH GOD STEEL FRAG GOD

posted about 3 years ago

LETS FUCKING GO BABY! 100T IS GETTING REVENGE ON ENVY'S TRASH ASS FOR BEATING THEM BACK IN THE PLAYOFFS SO THAT WE COULDNT GO TO ICELAND. WE'RE GOING TO BERLIN! CLEAN 2-0 REVENGE

posted about 3 years ago

fuck off, so fucking annoying and genuinely triggering to see 100T THROW THEIR PISTOLS. That 2nd half pistol was easily theirs, almost everyone on envy was low wtf win a pistol holy fuck man. But other than that, LETS FUCKING GO 100T

posted about 3 years ago

LOL

posted about 3 years ago

LMFAO

posted about 3 years ago

There are hundreds of scenarios and times it happens and costs them rounds.

posted about 3 years ago

Nah, vandal is better on ascent for sure. Kills through smokes are extremely situational and you can do the same with the vandal. In mid, the phantom is objectively worse. Phantom does not have better accuracy, and no pro will spray down people iin mid. You clearly don't watch valorant. Pros always tap/burst fire at mid/long range fights. they dont commit to sprays, they reset recoil, which vandal is better at as well. Vandal requires less body shots too, and wins in that aspect too. The phantom actually doesnt beat vandal in mid LMAO you need to do more research.

posted about 3 years ago

What? Wdym Im wrong, i literally stated "I do think that what you said is more likely, their players getting signed by bigger orgs."

Can you read? Lmao lack of reading comprehension. Playing well against 100T doesnt mean shit, those are open qualifier matches with rusty and sloppy tier 1 teams who have just played their first match. That applies to literally every other team too. Soniqs did good against sen, DZ did good against XSET, etc. Less footage to work with from 100T, too.

posted about 3 years ago

i mean even soniqs did 'pretty good' against sen, those are just sloppy open qualifier matches so they dont really matter too much. I just think that they shouldnt expect the entire roster to be signed to an org like in this tweet - https://twitter.com/frostyZK/status/1413595550172160003

Realistically only individuals from the roster will be signed to specific orgs

posted about 3 years ago

https://twitter.com/frostyZK/status/1413595550172160003

Wtf? So they're planning to stay together as free agents as a team? Thats a stupid idea, I dont see any orgs investing in this squad. They're good, but they dont really have the potential to become tier 1 or even top 8 NA. I hope they mean that they're just individually open to offers, because I can only see the big orgs picking up individuals from the squad for their own squad, not the entire team.

posted about 3 years ago

Beating TSM isnt a good accomplishment lol... TSM is a tier 2 team. Its entirely possible that they just werent looking good at all, Noble is still a tier 2 team. But I do think that what you said is more likely, their players getting signed by bigger orgs.

posted about 3 years ago

Huh? Scrims must've been going awfully I guess... or maybe internal conflict.

posted about 3 years ago

Yeah that's stupid as fuck... trades should not exist in a game like this. He killed the phoenix ult first, and thats that, he should not be dead there.

posted about 3 years ago

worst user is dogegamer for sure. Braindead baiter

posted about 3 years ago

That just isnt true at all lmao, and you can even find so many clips of pros losing fights to vandals bc of phantom not having one tap head shot and then not being able to convert the body shot due to strafing / tap fight and the other pros reaction time effectively using the vandal one tap

posted about 3 years ago

What? Phantom iis not nearly as good as vandal in long range or even mid range. It takes 5 body shots with phantom at mid/long range while vandal it only takes 4 body shots. Also, you have the consistent 1 taps while phantom cannot one tap at those ranges. In pro play you see this happen a lot where its a phantom vs a vandal, and both pros are strafing trying to tap the head, the phantom hits the head but cannot convert to a body shot, where the pro w/ vandal hits the head right after and kills him thanks to one tap.

posted about 3 years ago

ascent has a lot of MID to long range fights. for example A main to A heaven. And mid in itself is very mid/long range, and the vandal is superior in those fights as well due to its better stats. Vandal flicks on icebox work really well wdym? That just sounds like your aim isnt good enough lol. vandal's ffirst shot inaccuracy is not nearly as bad as you report it to be. Most of your shots will hit if you're accurate, its very unlikely to have that inaccuracy actually affect you in any consistent way. It doesnt make the one tap less effective, your accuracy just isnt good enough. Phantom is only best on 3 maps.

posted about 3 years ago

actually, the vandal's inaccuracy isnt that bad at all. vandal is better on long range maps like icebox breeze and ascent, while phantom is better on all the other maps. vandal's' stats make it better than the phantom in a lot of ways, for example its damage is 40 body shot at all ranges, so at mid/long range vandal would win a fight, obviously it has the 1 tap headshot at all ranges as well which is a huge advantage. it also has a better recoil reset

posted about 3 years ago

lmao

posted about 3 years ago

It factually isn't though..

posted about 3 years ago

They definitely are. In Iceland they had to use a stand-in in jammyz who wasnt even a tier 1 pro, and they had a couple weeks to prac with him. Now, they have thief who's a tier 1 pro with a lot of exp and they've had nearly a month to prac.. They are definitely better now but other teams just evolved WAY MORE than them.

posted about 3 years ago

If you dont know any previous encounter, it would mean you dont have sufficient data to conclude that the loss to BBG was anything but a fluke from BBG to sentinels. You have to wait and see if BBG can get consistent results against other tier 1 teams, if they dont, then obviously it was a fluke. From ur example alone, 100T beating BBG wouldnt mean 100T >> sentinels necessarily. you need more data.

posted about 3 years ago
1 •• 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 •• 19