So what? My point is that a double NA team final would really put NA in a great spot to acknowledge its superiority in this tournament. Hence it's not lucky to them considering they're all put in the same bracket and only 1 NA team will be through.
| Flag: | International |
| Registered: | May 28, 2021 |
| Last post: | April 24, 2023 at 6:45 PM |
| Posts: | 662 |
So what? My point is that a double NA team final would really put NA in a great spot to acknowledge its superiority in this tournament. Hence it's not lucky to them considering they're all put in the same bracket and only 1 NA team will be through.
I don't think it's really lucky to NA considering only 1 NA team can get to finals.
There's been much improvement from all teams to catch up with Sentinels, just don't be too quick to count them out too. At this point, with a combination of a team having a great day and the other a bad day anybody can come out on top.
Basically yes. We are comparing a much less developed SEN with an already Champion SEN well developed and structured going throughout an entire tournament completely unbeaten. But yeah.
Well obviously there'll be some work to be done for both parts, there shouldn't be any doubts about this. I don't think they'll shift their playstyle entirely.
Some people just can't
Betting advice: Only put in the money that you're okay with losing.
Exactly. There's really no particular order for a losing event for a team like SEN. They've proved they are on top and can beat anybody, which means that it really matters not the order of match-ups or who they match against, as long as the other team manages to get on top of them at the end of the series.
I understand some teams mind be upsetting against SEN and give them a harder time, but given that most likely the best two teams of the tournament will eventually face at some point during the tournament I don't really think there's any particular order that would give the rest of teams a better chance at winning other than, what I already said, have SEN lose early in the playoff stages.
I don't really get it.
The chance all teams have at winning other than SEN solely depends on SEN losing. It doesn't matter who they play against, so long they lose they stand a chance at winning.
mans probably immortal at eating ass amirite
For sure it is a good alternative. But it gives some different vibes and adds a little more to the competition having them face each other just like they do in League. I personally like the distribution and the stage and all, truly feels different and brand new, but in-ears are the best solution to keep all the set-up as it is.
Despite this, I feel like the ability to maintain your ult activated for as long as you hold it is a bit overtuned IMO. I feel like they should add some sort of timer similar to Reyna's Empress.
Wasn't brehze in the Top 20 HLTV Ranking as one of the best players? I think that would make it hard for him to switch to a different game.
edit: nvm he isn't
its aight to be superstitious, you're most definitely not alone
maybe i push it a little too far, i always wear a necklace that has two trinkets on it, whenever I'm about to watch a team I'm supporting playing I must wear it backwards, otherwise I feel like I'm jinxing my team lol
he's legit funny, aims to trigger people and succeds every time
i used to rock a lotta WoW now I just play single player games aside from Valorant like AC and so on...
also the show 21
Would've been great. Tho maybe with a crowd some individuals might find it motivating. Yet again 100T are full of LAN experiencie so maybe they would've put up a greater fight since round 1.
I don't think this accounts for my claim, but somewhat holds a little to it.
I’ll never understand how valorant players and valorant teams allow players that just.... miss... shots. I feel like there has to be pools of pro players in the EMEA that won’t miss simple shots. Or clutchers that won’t mess the clutches idk man it seems so SILLY. Would love opinions on this.
A thousand thieves are probably the strongest on that list
At this point it's fair to say that unless some T1 players switch from CSGO to Valorant we won't be seeing new Orgs pick up teams. I would guess since it's not gonna make them enough money to sustain its team in Valorant with players that either don't have the level or haven't proved themselves, and the ones that have already play under a banner, there won't be no consideration.
That's why some teams said MAYBE and other just plain NO.
Sorry if I'm completely mistaken but weren't Astralis having financial issues?
I definitely agree with you. It's nice to see fresh blood being developed in the scene and trying their best to prove themselves in every other game.
Well of course you mean why switch right now. You're right in that, there's no point in switching to a different game when you're the top at the one you're currently playing.
I'm thinking he probably meant as Valorant will eventually get bigger than CS (hopium) in the future.
never too late to make the right choice my friend
well that breeze semmed pretty tenz sided to be honest..................
Under what org would u see this happening?
I thought Sentinels and NA were the dominant ones? tf
Well, anything could happen.
plus justin is as annoying as he gets jesus christ
Winning or losing doesn't always determine which team of the 2 is better, rather than which one performed better at that specific series.
Imagine Sentinels loses to whatever other Team, we know for a fact based on recent performances that Sen are the better team. Would that mean they're worse than the team they lost against? No.
dapr is radiant in trashtalking and u gotta love it
your a little late, dont use Internet Explorer next time (4)
Where in Spain tho? It seems to me the only few plausible possibilites are either Madrid or Barcelona.
Discord