kekw is that a Sen fanboy talking?
Flag: | South Korea |
Registered: | April 18, 2021 |
Last post: | November 14, 2024 at 6:39 PM |
Posts: | 2790 |
kekw is that a Sen fanboy talking?
VS 2-1 :D
hopefully
or..... VK just didn't need to exploit something they were fully aware of and especially after other high-profile teams had been previously DQ'd for
That's nonsense. High profile teams have already been DQ'd because of this. There's no doubt that they were fully aware that this was an exploit not supposed to be taken advantage of.
It's not harsh at all. If anything VK should be celebrating that they're not automatically losing the map. Heck they should be ecstatic that they're not DQ'd at all and have a chance replay Acend.
Judging by your posts, you haven't been on here since the past 4 days. This is just over 24 hours but the biggest news is that VK defeated Acend 13-8 in the last map, but they used an exploitable Cypher cam location which others teams in previous tourneys have been punished for using. Of the 6 rounds where the cam was used, Acend lost 4 of those rounds according to Riot so they flipped all 6 rounds that the cam was used (effectively 4) so from a 13-8 to a 12-10 in favor of Acend plus one more round for economic damage from losing the potentially 4 winnable rounds. Lots of Brazilians are understandably pissed (not all tho). If you ask me, the logic and reasoning behind the round conversions are justified, but Riot should have definitely acted sooner rather than waiting 10 hours after the match was over.
a bit over 100 words but oh well
common Tamagao W
⢰⣶⠶⢶⣶⣶⡶⢶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⡶⠶⢶⣶⣶⣶⣶
⠘⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠄⠄⠄⠈⠉⠄⠄⣹⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿
⠄⠤⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⡈⠙⠛⣿⣿⣿⣧⣀⠠⣤⣤⣴⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶
⢠⠄⠄⣀⣀⣀⣭⣿⣿⣿⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣤⣿⣿⠉⠉⠉⢉⣉⡉⠉⠉⠙⠛⠛
⢸⣿⡀⠄⠈⣹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣷⣾⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠛⢩⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣿⣿⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⣠⣴⣿⣷⣭⣻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⠸⠿⣿⣿⣿⠋⣴⡟⠋⠈⠻⠿⠿⠛⠛⠛⠛⠛⠃⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⡁⠈⠉⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣤⡄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠈⠄⠈⠻⠿⠛⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣠⣄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⢀⣀⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⡀⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠉⠉⠁⠄⠄⠄⠄⠐⠒⠒⠄⠄⠄⠄⠉⢸⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⢿⣦⣄⣠⣄⠛⠟⠃⣀⣀⡀⠄⠄⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⡀⢀⣰⣦⣼⣿⣿⡿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⠄⢰⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢛⣥⣾⣟⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡆⠈⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⠿⣧⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
nah just you making accounts only to start creating threads just to rant
Registered December 4th
go to the youtube stream and roll back the time a bit
he really hard performed the whole 2nd half tho not just the last 2v1
go to the youtube stream and roll back the time a bit
he really hard performed the whole 2nd half tho not just the last 2v1
Riot should have taken action sooner, but there logic behind the round conversions were justified imo.
Respect
he was just giving them benefit of the doubt
just checked the post like you said
"Acend won two of those rounds"
Anyways, I don't think you understand how detrimental eco damage can be. Acend lost several potentially winnable rounds, whether it be 3 or 4. Either way, if Acend had won those potentially winnable rounds, there could have been up to 2 rounds where VK would have been forced into eco save and Acend would have had full rifle rounds.
Possibly, or maybe even hand the win outright to Acend for VK's exploit.
Didn't they say they won 2 rounds?
Still, assuming that you're correct, 3 potentially lost rounds (and if I really want to argue this, crucial information gathered which can lead to more precious picks on Acend players making them lose weapons and have worse eco regardless of if they won the round or not) is enough to justify flipping more than one round in favor of Acend on top of the flipped round losses.
Acend won 2 of those rounds and lost 4. Thus the 13-8 to 12-9 switch plus the round for economic damage for potentially 4 lost rounds.
the other 2 rounds were sort of related since the cam exploit was being used then too. It's just that Acend won those rounds and there was nothing to be flipped in favor of them. If VK had won those, those rounds would also theoretically have been flipped in favor of Acend.
Correction: VK won 4, lost 2
Acend lost 4 of those rounds, not 3.
"Rounds 13, 14, 15, 17, 19, and 20. Acend won two of those rounds"
Flipping those 4 lost rounds changes the score from 13-8 in favor of VK to 12-9 in favor of Acend as written in the article.
And yes, ofc they are trying to make one team reach 13 to determine a winner, thus where the economic impact of 4 potentially lost rounds comes to play.
Again, Riot should have handled it sooner, but there justification for how they flipped the score seems reasonable to me.
Riot definitely waited too long and handled the situation poorly.
Still, their argument in their logic behind reverting those specific rounds, such as accounting for the economic impact of six rounds and the cam giving crucial information even if Acend attacked B site are fair arguments for me.
common Hudsen W
couldn't have said it better myself lol
VS 2 - 0 Fnatic :)
you need to save your tierlist first, you only re-sent the original link
aww get well soon. Ty for your hard work <3
accounts like yours should be banned ngl
@Eutalyx
"Acend had the misfortune of being placed into the same group as SuperMassive Blaze, EMEA's second seed, and 100 Thieves, the most experienced squad of the tournament"
Acend were in a group with SMB, Paper Rex, and Vision Strikers, not 100T just fyi :)
cringe + ratio in honor of Purest
CRCRCRCRCR-------CRCRCRCRCR----------------CRCR------------CRCRCRCRCRCRCR---------CRCRCRCRCRCRCR
CRCRCRCRCR-------CRCRCRCRCR--------------CR--CR------------CRCRCRCRCRCRCR---------CRCRCRCRCRCRCR
CRCR----------------------------------CRCR------------CR-----CR------------CRCR--------------------------------CRCR-------------CRCR
CRCR---------------------------------CRCR------------CR------CR------------CRCR--------------------------------CRCR-------------CRCR
CRCRCRCRCR-----------------CRCR------------CR--------CR------------CRCR--------------------------------CRCRCRCRCRCRCR
CRCRCRCRCR---------------CRCR------------CR----------CR------------CRCR--------------------------------CRCRCRCRCRCRCR
CRCR--------------------------CRCR-------------CR------------CR------------CRCR--------------------------------CRCR-------CRCR
CRCR-----------------------CRCR--------------CRCRCRCRCRCR--------CRCR--------------------------------CRCR----------CRCR
CRCRCRCRCR-------CRCRCRCRCR---------------------CR------------CRCRCRCRCRCRCR---------CRCR--------------CRCR
CRCRCRCRCR-------CRCRCRCRCR---------------------CR------------CRCRCRCRCRCRCR---------CRCR------------------CRCR
Common xominousx_ W (and tamagao <3)
VS will falter in groups (either perform poorer than expectations and barely squeak out of groups or won't even make it out at all)
huh? why are you assuming things? I just gave a genuine password suggestion :/