welcome autumnly, to the world of paragraph writers. prepare for many more allats to come

Okay it's obvious that ASE will beat FUT,

but the real question is whether or not they can beat the winner of EG vs DRX.

DRX are too structured and experienced to lose rematches, especially to a team that they scrim regularly.

but I can't say the same for EG.

EG is used to a "normal" style of playing, they've maybe scrimmed with EMEA and other APAC teams now, but they expect a more structured style of valorant than what the Chinese teams have.

Don't forget that they're all still rookies, and Boostio and Potter took a lot longer than mCe and Runi did to adapt to better opponents throughout the Americas season. Since there's no way they've been able to scrim ASE since arriving (2 week rule and allat), Their unpredictable, chaotic playstyle is likely to throw them off and make them collapse under the pressure.

ASE has better firepower overall, and if Demon1 has a bad game then it's game over for EG, even if he's on it'll be a close game with Demon1 fragging over everyone else and Life farming the others.

The most likely outcome, however, is that DRX will beat EG, and ASE will beat FUT and EG and make playoffs.

ASE is making playoffs

No I 100% believe ASE will beat FUT. FUT is less structured and ASE thrives on chaos.

They already made it a close match against DRX, and FUT is significantly worse in almost every way besides their star duelist and different strats.

If EG win against DRX, then I can see them making them doing better the second time around, but unlikely as DRX is really good at holding onto control.

However, if DRX beat EG, then I think ASE will win against EG in lowers. EG is a heavy counter-strat team and if Life diffs Demon1, then their sheer chaos and firepower will bring out the rookies in EG.

Assuming EG loses to DRX, which is the likely outcome, then I predict ASE going to playoffs

Im just ego-bumping tbf, I made this 4 days ago but nobody believed me

.

i dont claim him

i've been on a fate binge recently ngl. I watched the original, ubw, and heaven's feel. I liked the archer scenes

I skipped on all the pedo scenes.

I liked seeing Illya live an innocent carefree life as a regular kid without having any knowledge of servants, having both her parents in her life and not having to fight in the holy grail war

i liked seeing miyu happy after all the suffering she had to endure in her own universe.

BUT MOST OF ALL I JUST WANTED TO SEE KIRITSUGU BE A GOOD FATHER but the show excluded that for some reason

watch fate/zero, kiritsugu is actually yoru

I just sat through one movie and 4 seasons of this show just to find out Kiritsugu doesn't show up at all in the illya timeline.

I just wanted to see him be a kind father in a normal everyday life with his wife and kids...

Goated IGL brings back Guard to their former glory.

loses to m80 still but I BELIEVE IN VALYN UNTIL THEN. SHOW THOSE VLR DOGS who's the 2nd BEST IGL IN NA

my new account is Seamstresss

gg rematch tho i think i can win using same team

challenge sent

Riding back home rn gimme like 5 mins

i will beat your legendaries with my comp pilled team

trust i have the NRG of pokemon teams

my premade strategy thoo

gen 8 anything goes

uhhh whatever has the least rules cus apparently half my team is banned

I haven't seen his raze in a while, so I'm not including it

my new account is Nachtel

can you link the game im too lazy to find it

I have to see how he compares with Sayf before I can make that change, for now im putting him at 9.5 along with Sayf

jesus calm down, I corrected it.

unfortunately not every team has comms videos I can meticulously nitpick.

i wish tho

NRG puts FNS on Yoru tommorrow; both him and ange1 drop 40 and match ends with NRG winning 2-1 NAVI

There's no particular criteria for the duelists I chose, just the ones that came to my mind. This isn't a top 10 list, I'm just putting in the duelist I thought of and their rating

We are in a meta where the duelist is sometimes forced to not play duelist on every map. E

In an ideal world you have flex players that can fill every support role that is needed exceptionally well and the duelist can stick to jett, raze, neon.

But in reality every roster has some sort of role conflict issue, and especially when prospects are limited for other roles sometimes you have to make concessions and have someone play a role that is not their comfort role.

If I, as an org owner, see that a duelist is capable of filling absolutely anything and still perform at a high level, then that duelist has an inherent value to me over a jett one trick.

It also guarantees long-term consistency. If whatever agent they main gets nerfed, or if the duelist role gets undermined like it did under the chamber meta, then being flexible means that player will survive in esports and won't be a huge money pit for the org they're signed to, and will be a less risky investment, which I would happily pay a premium for.

A flexible vs an unflexible duelist is the equivelant of an insured vs uninsured car

Request accepted

I haven't watched enough navi games (where he isn't playing yoru) to know tbh. If i did itd probably be inaccurate af

Brumphrey,

I have quested through various lands, obtained the most valuable pokemon, trained them to absolute perfection...

All in the name of defeating you.

1v1 me in pokemon showdown once more

Sincerely,
Nachtel

I don't know if I could; I don't know enough about what makes someone good in other roles.

I only really made this to 1. Kill time and 2. Outline ways I can improve myself as a duelist

A matter of what I've seen so far. For all I know wolfen is God's gift to valorant and just whiffs everytime he's on stage.

I'll update these as the season goes along; if something shows a good raze then I'll add that to his agent pool

Its based on my personal opinion ngl. For example, with ardiis, he's played raze against Sentinels and NRG won, but he didn't particularly look very comfortable on raze (nading then satcheling into his own nade) so I don't consider raze part of his agent pool

You can think of pathing as how good they are at the micro aspect of taking a site, where they decide to go first, the spaces they clear, etc.

Corrected

My mistake, corrected.

I was changing each stat over and over again when comparing and forgot to update some it seems

Notes:

1. Overall score can be deceptive, if a player's overall score is carried by their aim score while their other scores are lower, then what that reflects is the player's consistency. For players with really high aim scores but low scores everywhere else, they will have games where they look like the best player in the world, and then have bad off games other times.

2. A player with a lower overall score can still perform better than a player with a higher overall score if put on a team that mitigates their flaws (for example: if a player can only play one agent and their agent pool is shit, they can still thrive on a team or meta that only really requires them to play that agent).

3. Individual scores are entirely subjective based on what I think.

4. Aim is a combined score of awping and rifling.

Aspas: 9.15/10
9.5/10 Rifling
9.75/10 Awping
9.5/10 Gamesense
9/10 Pathing
8/10 Agent pool (can jett, raze, and neon)

Derke: 8.85/10
9.75/10 Rifling
9.5/10 Awping
9/10 Gamesense
9/10 Pathing
7/10 Agent pool (can jett and raze)

Sayf: 8.8/10
9.5/10 Rifling
8.0/10 Awping
9.5/10 Gamesense
9/10 Pathing
8/10 Agent Pool (For duelists; can jett and raze. Can killjoy)

Something: 8.25/10
10/10 Rifling
9.5 Awping
7/10 Gamesense
7/10 Pathing
6/10 Agent pool (can Reyna but can't raze)

Sayaplayer: 8.3/10
8.5/10 Rifling
9/10 Awping
8/10 Gamesense
8/10 Pathing
8/10 Agent Pool (For duelists; can jett, neon, raze)

Qw1: 7.85/10
9/10 Rifling
9.25/10 Awping
7/10 Gamesense
7/10 Pathing
7/10 Agent Pool (Jett, Neon)

Ardiis 7.6/10:
8.5/10 Rifling
9/10 Awping
7/10 Gamesense
7/10 Pathing
6.5/10 Agent Pool (Jett, can technically play killjoy and sage but doesn't look comfortable on either)

TenZ: 7.4/10
9.5/10 Rifling
8.5/10 Awping
7/10 Gamesense
6/10 Pathing
6.5/10 (jett, and can play sage and kayo but doesnt look too comfortable on them)

Demon1: 7.95/10
9.75/10 Rifling
9/10 Awping
7/10 Gamesense
7/10 Pathing
7/10 Agent pool (can brim but can't raze)

Leaf: 8.7/10
9.5/10 Rifling
8.0/10 Awping
9/10 Gamesense
9/10 Pathing
8/10 Agent pool (for duelists; can jett and neon, additionally can also play killjoy and skye)

Yay: 7.95/10
9/10 Rifling
9.75/10 Awping
9/10 Gamesense
6/10 Pathing
6/10 Agent pool (for duelists; can jett. Can also sage but not as important to meta)

dms

I really don't want to go through 3 hours of the latest platchat episode, but he said it there

You're putting words in OP's mouth, he never once said the word dominant. He just asked who is top 10 including both current and past form which could mean either

That's what I'm trying to ask; are you ranking them based on how dominant they were or how individually skilled they were objectively?

No but what I'm saying is: if we're talking about ranking the best players at their prime, then are we talking about ranking them based on how dominant they were or how objectively skilled they were compared to one another; as in, would prime TenZ at Reykjavik be able to diff prime Aspas?

If it's about how dominant they were, then yes I can see why you'd put TenZ on this list, he was a step above everyone else during his era.

But if it's about who at their prime was better, then I'd say there are far more players than TenZ who could go on this list until he proves himself again

Sayf: 9/10
10/10 Aim
9/10 Gamesense
9/10 Pathing
7/10 Agent Pool (For duelists; can jett and raze)

Something: 8.25/10
13/10 Aim
7/10 Gamesense
7/10 Pathing
6/10 Agent pool (can Reyna but can't raze)

Sayaplayer: 8/10
9/10 Aim
8/10 Gamesense
8/10 Pathing
7/10 Agent Pool (For duelists; can jett and raze)

Demon1: 8/10
12/10 Aim
7/10 Gamesense
7/10 Pathing
6/10 Agent pool (can brim but can't raze)

Leaf: 9/10
10/10 Aim
9/10 Gamesense
9/10 Pathing
8/10 Agent pool (for duelists; can jett and neon, also can play killjoy)

I quote mCe in saying, "Your duelist should either be the smartest player on the server or the dumbest"

To me, there's nothing more valuable than a highly intelligent, highly mechanically gifted, and outspoken duelist who can play both jett and raze like Sayf once you break past his ego.

Are we talking about their form objectively or in comparison to other players?

I dont really think TenZ was all too impressive at Iceland in retrospect since the average skill level of that tournament was considerably lower than, say, Copenhagen 2022

mb, I didn't understand the post tbh but you're always posting about your love life i just assumed thats what it was

I am the strong sperm. Its the Greek God ok? the Greek god

i never understood why snapchat streaks mattered so much to some people, if i want to disappear for a few weeks at a time let me

im just saying you could be getting paid to distribute promotional material

lol i think he's talking about the wacky ethnic roots of turks. they're not mongols though, even the turkic people that lived in the steppes above china were their own separate group from the mongols and jurchens that they competed with