https://mobile.twitter.com/witnessqq/status/1406631108259848196
It's a job. Sometimes the best people don't get selected for a given job; especially when there is not only a relatively new industry in consideration, but also a totally new game. I get the basic idea, that financial incentives leads to an increase in demand of people who are willing to coach and that fresh supply may not just be in it for the love of the game, but the reason they should be getting paid is because they have the qualifications and capacity to do the job.
Why should the industry as a whole go backwards and choose to restrict their coaches pay, because financial incentives mean "they're not in it for the game"? It's not about the damn incentive, it's about sustainability. The coaches, that are "in it for the game" don't just disappear because financial incentives exist, they're the ones most likely to get picked up in the first place and they can enjoy focusing on the game and not worrying about how they're going to pay their next month's rent.
If the people selected can't do the job properly, eventually people who prove themselves to be more capable ought to take their place, assuming proper management and communication within the teams.