ez tbd
ZETA
PRX
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.35 0.16 2.04 | 288 56 424 | 18 1 17 | / 14 6 8 / | 5 2 3 | +4 -5 +9 | 74% 57% 83% | 171 32 252 | 54% 100% 51% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.66 1.02 0.45 | 153 223 114 | 10 6 4 | / 16 6 10 / | 2 0 2 | -6 0 -6 | 58% 57% 58% | 93 109 84 | 21% 25% 14% | 3 1 2 | 2 1 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.59 0.80 0.47 | 139 143 138 | 11 4 7 | / 15 5 10 / | 3 2 1 | -4 -1 -3 | 74% 57% 83% | 94 88 98 | 57% 50% 62% | 0 0 0 | 1 1 0 | -1 -1 0 | |
|
0.54 0.72 0.44 | 158 157 159 | 11 4 7 | / 17 6 11 / | 2 1 1 | -6 -2 -4 | 47% 57% 42% | 94 74 106 | 32% 13% 45% | 2 1 1 | 6 1 5 | -4 0 -4 | |
|
0.50 0.28 0.63 | 93 53 117 | 5 1 4 | / 14 6 8 / | 6 3 3 | -9 -5 -4 | 47% 43% 50% | 68 40 85 | 18% 0% 23% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.62 1.63 1.61 | 298 335 237 | 22 15 7 | / 10 7 3 / | 2 2 0 | +12 +8 +4 | 79% 83% 71% | 186 194 174 | 27% 26% 28% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.54 1.58 1.47 | 269 245 310 | 19 12 7 | / 10 6 4 / | 2 1 1 | +9 +6 +3 | 74% 58% 100% | 172 153 204 | 31% 29% 32% | 3 2 1 | 1 1 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |
|
1.28 1.17 1.48 | 229 208 267 | 15 9 6 | / 11 8 3 / | 6 4 2 | +4 +1 +3 | 74% 75% 71% | 136 118 166 | 24% 21% 27% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.95 0.86 1.09 | 159 144 186 | 10 5 5 | / 10 7 3 / | 8 7 1 | 0 -2 +2 | 84% 75% 100% | 98 95 103 | 27% 25% 30% | 1 0 1 | 1 1 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.70 0.53 0.99 | 172 168 179 | 10 6 4 | / 14 11 3 / | 4 2 2 | -4 -5 +1 | 63% 58% 71% | 112 103 128 | 17% 20% 9% | 3 2 1 | 4 3 1 | -1 -1 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.34 1.12 1.20 | 207 218 207 | 48 17 31 | / 35 12 23 / | 20 11 9 | +13 +5 +8 | 79% 67% 86% | 136 136 136 | 38% 41% 36% | 4 2 2 | 4 3 1 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.47 1.47 1.10 | 230 115 299 | 41 6 35 | / 40 17 23 / | 19 9 10 | +1 -11 +12 | 72% 67% 75% | 155 84 196 | 29% 23% 31% | 9 2 7 | 6 4 2 | +3 -2 +5 | |
|
1.33 0.88 1.05 | 210 224 189 | 44 19 25 | / 38 12 26 / | 9 3 6 | +6 +7 -1 | 72% 67% 75% | 131 139 126 | 25% 30% 21% | 7 1 6 | 3 1 2 | +4 0 +4 | |
|
1.11 1.00 1.04 | 220 198 225 | 42 15 27 | / 41 14 27 / | 16 5 11 | +1 +1 0 | 72% 81% 67% | 148 132 157 | 22% 16% 25% | 11 4 7 | 7 1 6 | +4 +3 +1 | |
|
0.77 0.94 0.88 | 179 161 187 | 36 13 23 | / 40 17 23 / | 15 7 8 | -4 -4 0 | 70% 62% 75% | 110 86 124 | 23% 16% 26% | 4 2 2 | 2 1 1 | +2 +1 +1 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.24 0.95 1.11 | 233 272 191 | 51 35 16 | / 42 27 15 / | 7 7 0 | +9 +8 +1 | 67% 75% 52% | 156 168 135 | 20% 18% 27% | 4 3 1 | 11 6 5 | -7 -3 -4 | |
|
0.92 1.27 1.05 | 194 168 251 | 39 21 18 | / 41 27 14 / | 18 12 6 | -2 -6 +4 | 68% 61% 81% | 124 104 158 | 28% 23% 33% | 5 3 2 | 2 1 1 | +3 +2 +1 | |
|
1.15 0.84 1.03 | 201 217 164 | 40 29 11 | / 39 25 14 / | 14 8 6 | +1 +4 -3 | 68% 75% 57% | 122 135 100 | 30% 35% 22% | 3 1 2 | 4 1 3 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.83 1.21 0.97 | 221 219 248 | 43 25 18 | / 45 32 13 / | 9 6 3 | -2 -7 +5 | 70% 64% 81% | 146 137 162 | 21% 22% 21% | 8 4 4 | 13 12 1 | -5 -8 +3 | |
|
0.47 0.73 0.57 | 122 115 140 | 21 12 9 | / 44 30 14 / | 25 14 11 | -23 -18 -5 | 65% 58% 76% | 79 77 83 | 16% 20% 12% | 2 1 1 | 5 4 1 | -3 -3 0 |
ZETA
PRX
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.73 2.72 1.49 | 302 426 271 | 19 6 13 | / 6 0 6 / | 0 0 0 | +13 +6 +7 | 93% 100% 92% | 184 210 177 | 28% 33% 25% | 3 0 3 | 1 0 1 | +2 0 +2 | |
|
1.44 1.76 1.36 | 213 250 204 | 13 2 11 | / 6 1 5 / | 11 7 4 | +7 +1 +6 | 93% 100% 92% | 144 150 143 | 34% 44% 31% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.43 0.60 1.64 | 290 241 303 | 14 2 12 | / 9 3 6 / | 5 1 4 | +5 -1 +6 | 87% 100% 83% | 208 143 225 | 19% 6% 23% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |
|
1.39 2.73 1.05 | 234 355 204 | 14 5 9 | / 7 0 7 / | 2 0 2 | +7 +5 +2 | 100% 100% 100% | 137 146 135 | 29% 27% 29% | 2 2 0 | 1 0 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
1.17 0.83 1.26 | 196 50 232 | 9 0 9 | / 7 1 6 / | 4 2 2 | +2 -1 +3 | 80% 100% 75% | 141 42 165 | 28% 33% 28% | 3 0 3 | 0 0 0 | +3 0 +3 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.73 0.74 0.71 | 212 212 217 | 10 8 2 | / 14 11 3 / | 3 3 0 | -4 -3 -1 | 60% 67% 33% | 134 139 117 | 38% 47% 23% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.70 0.79 0.36 | 191 206 135 | 8 7 1 | / 14 11 3 / | 4 3 1 | -6 -4 -2 | 67% 67% 67% | 120 128 87 | 25% 25% 25% | 1 1 0 | 4 4 0 | -3 -3 0 | |
|
0.63 0.73 0.21 | 125 138 76 | 7 6 1 | / 14 11 3 / | 4 4 0 | -7 -5 -2 | 53% 58% 33% | 64 71 37 | 19% 25% 0% | 1 1 0 | 1 0 1 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.49 0.70 0.01 | 138 172 5 | 7 7 0 | / 13 10 3 / | 2 2 0 | -6 -3 -3 | 53% 67% | 92 114 5 | 20% 21% 0% | 0 0 0 | 4 2 2 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
0.25 0.23 0.37 | 88 73 149 | 3 2 1 | / 14 11 3 / | 4 3 1 | -11 -9 -2 | 47% 42% 67% | 59 50 96 | 8% 18% 0% | 0 0 0 | 2 2 0 | -2 -2 0 |
ZETA
PRX
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.54 1.56 1.52 | 268 257 278 | 24 11 13 | / 14 6 8 / | 6 2 4 | +10 +5 +5 | 74% 64% 83% | 165 163 166 | 32% 36% 29% | 3 2 1 | 2 2 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.19 1.50 0.91 | 212 213 212 | 17 9 8 | / 15 5 10 / | 9 3 6 | +2 +4 -2 | 83% 91% 75% | 152 166 139 | 22% 24% 21% | 6 2 4 | 1 0 1 | +5 +2 +3 | |
|
0.92 1.16 0.70 | 175 170 180 | 15 7 8 | / 16 6 10 / | 7 3 4 | -1 +1 -2 | 70% 64% 75% | 128 139 118 | 27% 33% 21% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.85 0.56 1.12 | 210 178 240 | 17 7 10 | / 19 11 8 / | 7 4 3 | -2 -4 +2 | 70% 64% 75% | 127 99 152 | 21% 14% 26% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.85 0.56 1.11 | 206 170 240 | 14 5 9 | / 19 10 9 / | 10 5 5 | -5 -5 0 | 65% 64% 67% | 151 129 171 | 20% 16% 21% | 4 2 2 | 5 3 2 | -1 -1 0 |
| R | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.37 1.19 1.57 | 301 283 322 | 25 12 13 | / 17 10 7 / | 1 1 0 | +8 +2 +6 | 78% 67% 91% | 190 178 203 | 22% 21% 25% | 4 1 3 | 5 5 0 | -1 -4 +3 | |
|
1.09 1.38 0.78 | 263 310 213 | 22 13 9 | / 19 10 9 / | 3 3 0 | +3 +3 0 | 65% 75% 55% | 173 197 146 | 17% 13% 27% | 2 1 1 | 6 3 3 | -4 -2 -2 | |
|
1.02 1.53 0.46 | 161 233 84 | 15 12 3 | / 14 6 8 / | 5 1 4 | +1 +6 -5 | 70% 83% 55% | 102 147 53 | 28% 34% 17% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 | |
|
0.92 0.44 1.44 | 187 121 260 | 13 3 10 | / 17 10 7 / | 12 7 5 | -4 -7 +3 | 74% 67% 82% | 123 88 161 | 30% 18% 38% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.45 0.32 0.60 | 118 127 109 | 8 5 3 | / 20 12 8 / | 13 4 9 | -12 -7 -5 | 61% 58% 64% | 77 86 67 | 14% 16% 11% | 1 1 0 | 2 1 1 | -1 0 -1 |
RIP EMEA slayers are denied the opportunity. Gonna be a banger match PRX vs ZETA
Hopefully G2 wins their next game so ZETA has the opportunity to eliminate all 3 EMEA representatives.
Edit: Well, this is fine too since EMEA is out anyway.
NOW this is the match i'm waiting for. gotta root for the boys.
PRX 2-1 Zeta
Confirms an Asian team in the top 3 at the very least.
I'm contractually obliged to support PRX but I also have twice overdosed on the Zetium
PRX 1-1 Zeta (last map goes 50-50 and they draw)
PRX going to 2-1 Zeta. Zeta had a good run, but they're outclassed by PRX.
i can't predict this match i dont want both team to lose :( , both teams soo fired up
all ZETA fans and PRX fans lets become friends and hope for an amazing 3 map game <3
Oh no my 2 Favs 🥺 but I still favor PRX best of luck for both teams at least we secured top 3 with asian team but still rooting for grand finals goodluck both #ZETAwin #PRXwin
F*ck bro I want PRX to win but I want to watch Lazvel on grand finals bc he make me cry w the interviews fak man this game is so heartbreaking
realistically i should root for PRX for my country but I really love Zeta's playstyle..
zeta 2-1
sugarz3ro and ten have beated them last year LCQ + playing with more stronger players
but PRX's playstyle might be hard for zeta
Last year f0rsaken wasnt on Jett so maybe this time it could be hard hope for the best tho
it depend on map pick..if they play in split and fracture...zeta had a huge chance to win...
My heart ain't ready for this match, I kinda want to see this match to be the final. But yeah, I think PRX will win 2-1
18-16
12-14
13-11
Hoping onto prx train, but if zeta beats them, they rather win the whole fkin tournament.
G2 > ZETA, PRX > G2
G2 = Paper
ZETA = Scissor
PRX = Rock
So this must be PRX 2-0
this is why we don't solely rely with this kind of logic. Each team may be a kryptonite for other teams.
Unfortunately valorant doesn't work like that brother, anyone can win this match
PRX 2-1 '//,eta
13-11 Split
6-13 Fracture
16-14 Icebox
will be very wrong
Ngl feels like this is more anticipated than upper final but for me Zeta 2-1 Paper Rex
Zeta won’t be able to handle PRXs hyper aggressive style.
2-0 PRX win.
Honestly, any team worth their salt who knows how to counter aggressive styles should be able to. I’m not sure which ones are, but I’m not entirely certain if zeta is able to.
imo the only team i can see handling their chaotic style is DRX / APAC teams ( if they have the talents / aim necessary ) mostly because there's order inside that chaos, sweeping the opponent in chaos while PRX themselves are playing orderly / organized even tho it doesnt seem so. Also because their chaos / aggressiveness is different compare to any other aggressive team.
However ZETA are 1 of PRX scrim partners so that could play a huge factor.
Still on that PRX Hopium tho ;D
Didn't aaron (mindfreak) said that they hated DRX because they played so slow, I'm pretty sure that manipulating the tempo of the game is PRX weakness (cancelling every agressive PRX attempt)
Any team that has a player who can reasonably pilot Astra can probably handle the aggression.
my brain tells me PRX my heart tells me ZETA DIVISION BABY WOOOOOOOOOOOO CMON #ZETAWIN
man these are 2 powerfull team, i like one of them goin to win.. but ill support PRX. PRX hope u all the best
Vouching for paper rex to win but i want them to win close game because this match is absolutely fire!
It's not about asia its about our region.So PRX FTW and they deserve to win
2-0 paper rex
Im not paper rex fan but they are really so good and fun to watch Also f0rsaken can be best player on valorant .
Forsaken is indian..he had plastic surgery and moved to singapore. he is jacked as faaak.
i know ure trolling but jason isnt lives in sg. just be smart. please. ure not even that funny bro.
I like this zeta is being more active and taking the fight to the fight takers
these pooper rex throwing that map hope they lost fckers rip my parley dog
what makes me mad is they're not even fighting, like intentional throw.. just look at map 3 these dog gonna stomp this japanese
LMAO atleast PRx reached further than the so called best asian team a.k.a DankRX. Talk about overrated.
Why didnt zeta participate in APAC qualifiers then? APAC doesnt always include Japan
if they arent part of apac. they cant play in APAC LCQ last year. even zeta considered themself as apac on their tweet.
ur statement is unreasonable
The mental fortitude of Zeta is just unreal. Props to them. Who would have guessed they could go this far? GG
3 round pushing mid without any reason. i mean i know ure paper rex but what for?
OMMMMA GOD THEY DO IT IM SO PROUD FOR MY BOYS I START THIS VCT WITH 1K EURO NOW I HAVE 25K, ZETA BEST TEAM IN THE WORLDDDDDDDDDDDD, SHIBUY DRUNK ALLLL NIGHTTTTTT ZETAAAA I FUCKING LOVE U BOYZ
more like forsaken always push mid like retard and trading 1 for 1 , then lose map control
Bro you're talking in hindsight. It could have worked but it didn't, it is what it is. They reached top 4 playing like this.
agreed. dont mind if d4v4i and mindfreak bottom fragging, they played the role. but the push without the trades were kinda meh imo.
it's not f0rsaken or jingg fault, just check the 3 guys in prx always timing and lose if its 1 v 1
new roster
look at round when scoreline 9-7 that mid push from forsaken cost the game by giving free map control for zeta
Hell no! he only started doing it from the round after PRX timeout, so was probably told to, and even then he always played safe and fall back after getting a pick. f0rsaken ended up 13/7 on defence a lot of impact kills so he really shouldnt be the one blamed.
ZETA chemistry is next level. The way those guys play off of each other reaches a level of syntony that is almost perfection.
forsaken check paypal pls ,fcking star syndrome solo hadnling losing map 3 lulw
Don't know why many people are mad but NT for our boys showing that APAC can compete with the world. GGs for Zeta they deserved the win and go win it all, `//, `//, `//,
Davai, mindfreak losing 1v1s consistently made them lost the game. They getting out aimed fr.
That's the thing about aggressive players, they get shut down against good teams who knows how to handle aggression and their game styles.
u have a point.....wait for ur downvotes lol...ppl will not understand
How u said like that with that statistic of f0rsaken? PRX losing the match not always because of their duelist
damn mindfreak -23, bad day for him.. Always got timing and losing 1vs1 situation... Controller diff
Win or lost they make apac proud ..not like shithead bleed esport more like bot esport .. malding fans and ceo rich but noob & 0 win L