How it works / Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Semi-Finals
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Semi-Finals Recap
Aspas vs Something : Aspas (32)
T3xture vs Demon1 : Demon1 (21)
How it works / Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Semi-Finals
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Semi-Finals Recap
Aspas vs Something : Aspas (32)
T3xture vs Demon1 : Demon1 (21)
A fun fact is that in the 5 matches they had against each other, Demon1 never came out positive in direct duels against Aspas.
These direct duels don’t really count for their aim, it’s not always a 1v1 aim duel
This is obvious.
But think about it, if this happens five times in a row, then it's something to be observed, don't you agree?
3/5 times Ethan clears Aspas then, that means Ethan has better aim and there is something to be observed ? GET OUT Fella 🗣️🗣️
Fallacy of false equivalence. Let’s hypothetically assume that direct duels between players mean nothing and that each player has a 50% chance of winning any given duel against another (even though this is not true).
Following this reasoning:
As the consistency of a perfect performance (like 5/0) is statistically much more significant than a narrow margin like 3/2.
The thing is these stats dont mean anything for straight raw aim other than performance lil bro, you put on the nerd glasses with the Brazilian bias we get it, everyone with eyes can see who has better aim.
And counting that NRG game is so shameless for a AIM duel stat while the first few times when they played Demon1 was still new to pro while Aspas was already a champion.
Yeah, baitpas shouldn't even be in the conversation for the best aimer title, Demon1/Alfa vs nAts is a better comparison, although nAts clears.
baitaspas ? where did you get this from? lol. Keep sucking the balls of Europeans and North Americans XD. Aspas is the goat, cry.
If aspas loses this to lemon1 of all players, this site is actually braindead collectively.
aspas lost to him in tokyo and champs, i don’t know what you’re implying with “of all players”