2 questions for RIOT

#1

feaN

Was the camera in the rulebook?
You can make a tech pause for someone jumping on a box, but cant make tech pause for someone using a camera whole match?

#2

Dittete

11

Frags

+

–

The camera was in the rulebook yes. https://twitter.com/onurthegreat/status/1467062926901223424

Onur:
The decision is very unfair to @VivoKeyd. The admins should have detected the exploit right away, backtrack the round using the cronobreak, and give VK a warning. It had no impact on the victory and the penalty in my opinion is disproportionate.

LucasRojo:
Onur, I remember that they gave us the list of bugs and exploits in masters 3. Did they do it here?

Onur:
Yes and it was in it. It has also been a popular exploit for the Giants case and I find it hard to believe that someone who played Sentinel his entire career doesn't know it too.

#4

RiotTechPause

-5

Frags

+

–

prove

#6

dapada

3

Frags

+

–

LucasRojo:
Onur, I remember that they gave us the "list of bugs and exploits in" masters 3. Did they do it here?

Onur:
Yes and "it was in it". It has also been a popular exploit for the Giants case and I find it hard to believe that someone who played Sentinel his entire career doesn't know it too.

#9

m4ky

0

Frags

+

–

https://twitter.com/onurthegreat/status/1467079792285650945 Its was not on the rulebook, there's only a Ascent and a Haven cam on the rulebook.
How can Riot dont put a HUGE exploit like this in theyr rulebook?

#10

dapada

0

Frags

+

–

https://twitter.com/ACE_Krimson/status/1467109773229404160 but yeah it's understandable since it was confusing

#12

m4ky

0

Frags

+

–

I found this tweet yesterday https://twitter.com/IronDucks_/status/1466984468116299777, what do you think mate? Do you think its a texture bug or just the way that the roof was designed to be?

#13

dapada

1

Frags

+

–

"If you find something where you are not sure if it's a bug or clever use of a mechanic, please check with the administration if it is an exploit/bug before using it in the match. Subsequent punishments may also be possible."
"Cameras: Cameras may only be placed in places where they can be seen and destroyed by the opponents."
Source: https://www.vct.gg/statics/rules

It's in the rulebook. In my opinion, the ruling against VK is justified.

#14

m4ky

0

Frags

+

–

Fair enough.

#15

dapada

0

Frags

+

–

https://twitter.com/WiPRenaud/status/1467087587005370372

you might want to see this

#11

m4ky

0

Frags

+

–

https://twitter.com/ACE_Krimson/status/1467109773229404160 Tho theres this rule here but i dont really think thats the case.

#8

Dittete

3

Frags

+

–

Can't teach you to read man sorry, your parents should have taught you better

#16

Gomes255

0

Frags

+

–

prove it wasn't there then lmao? room temperature iq type beat

#3

ait8k

0

Frags

+

–

that's also true, they used the cam for 6 rounds I believe and none of the admins called a timeout, I wonder if they're watching the stream with the observers prospective or they have their own

#5

RiotTechPause

-7

Frags

+

–

No, only generical sentence like "exploit will not be tolerated" so you're able to create a biased rule to punish what you consider "exploit" in the specific case.
Riot two weights two measures

#7

dapada

0

Frags

+

–

#6

#17

hellaeleganceyeah

0

Frags

+

–

"Cameras may only be placed in places where they can be seen and destroyed by the opponents."