banger
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
274 | 19 | / 16 / | 2 | +3 | 177 | 34% | 3 | 4 | -1 | |||
|
191 | 12 | / 17 / | 9 | -5 | 122 | 31% | 1 | 0 | +1 | |||
|
169 | 11 | / 15 / | 3 | -4 | 111 | 31% | 3 | 3 | 0 | |||
|
129 | 10 | / 16 / | 7 | -6 | 76 | 44% | 2 | 1 | +1 | |||
|
105 | 6 | / 16 / | 4 | -10 | 72 | 8% | 0 | 2 | -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
320 | 23 | / 11 / | 10 | +12 | 201 | 36% | 1 | 2 | -1 | |||
|
288 | 21 | / 11 / | 1 | +10 | 185 | 45% | 7 | 4 | +3 | |||
|
223 | 14 | / 12 / | 15 | +2 | 141 | 12% | 2 | 1 | +1 | |||
|
204 | 14 | / 11 / | 2 | +3 | 150 | 24% | 0 | 1 | -1 | |||
|
125 | 8 | / 13 / | 4 | -5 | 79 | 23% | 0 | 1 | -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
274 | 19 | / 16 / | 2 | +3 | 177 | 34% | 3 | 4 | -1 | |||
|
191 | 12 | / 17 / | 9 | -5 | 122 | 31% | 1 | 0 | +1 | |||
|
169 | 11 | / 15 / | 3 | -4 | 111 | 31% | 3 | 3 | 0 | |||
|
129 | 10 | / 16 / | 7 | -6 | 76 | 44% | 2 | 1 | +1 | |||
|
105 | 6 | / 16 / | 4 | -10 | 72 | 8% | 0 | 2 | -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
320 | 23 | / 11 / | 10 | +12 | 201 | 36% | 1 | 2 | -1 | |||
|
288 | 21 | / 11 / | 1 | +10 | 185 | 45% | 7 | 4 | +3 | |||
|
223 | 14 | / 12 / | 15 | +2 | 141 | 12% | 2 | 1 | +1 | |||
|
204 | 14 | / 11 / | 2 | +3 | 150 | 24% | 0 | 1 | -1 | |||
|
125 | 8 | / 13 / | 4 | -5 | 79 | 23% | 0 | 1 | -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / | ||||||||||||
|
/ / |
From TEs Champions performance TE should 2-0 RRQ
But RRQ is a real deal they aren't weak even beating peak GENG and DRX in 2024 regular season (GENG members mightve been sick from a flu but u get my point)
But TE clearly showed their strength the only weakness is their map pool which is pretty small and weak in my opinion. Also Heybay is a good leader but his firepower is pretty weak
Still TE 2:1 RRQ cause RRQ didnt do the best in Redbull qual