1)Gambit
2)Sen
3)NV
4)100T
5)VS
6)ACE
7)Xset
8)G2
9)Team Liquid
10)Kru
you should at least have a logical reasoning for your "hot take"
obviously the latest International LAN, the most important event in the VCT circuit so far, would affect how people rate envy.
the level of competition was a degree above Iceland, and they went through the entire tournament without losing a single map until the finals.
defend your take
Oh god envy fans are jumping me now
Ok so
100T best envy more ( doesn’t mean anything to u guys )
100T beat gambit and they have a 100% stronger mental than envy
See 100T got stomped map 1 and in map 2 they got stomped and made a comeback
To be stomped like that and then comeback and win the next 2 series
It takes a really good team and a really strong mental and 100T have that
And for ppl who said it was fluke
100T vs Acend
They lost map 1 and then won 2-1
And they made a 12-7 comeback on final map
And for many
Acend and gambit were the best EMEA representatives
Smb didn’t do that great
And G2 hits different on LAN
And envy
Sure they beat sentinels
Sure they didn’t drop a map
But when they lost a map
They fought back
Sure but they couldn’t win after that
I’d make an arguement that MAYBE
If 100T made it to GF they could’ve won 3-1 or 3-2 against gambit
But who knows
nobody is "jumping you" lmao, i just wanted to hear why you think that. overdramatic
100T best envy more ( doesn’t mean anything to u guys )
you say "doesn't mean anything to you guys" as if it should. this is obviously a new roster with a distinct playstyle compared to back when they had mummay. they picked up literally the best player in all of NA, why would you cite results that he wasn't even involved in?
i'd hope you aren't factoring in the match they had in the berlin qualifier, where Envy had 4 days of practice... lmao... that would be incredibly dumb especially considering they were already qualified at that point
100T beat gambit and they have a 100% stronger mental than envy
this is how strategic matchups work in valorant. certain teams have playstyles that favour certain matchups, this should be obvious.
and you don't know anything about envy's mental so talking in absolutes (100% stronger mental) is a joke LMAO. what do you know about their mental? are you in their comms?
the rest of your comment is meaningless
what i'm getting from this is that it's literally all just random conjecture that you have no actual evidence for
If envy are best in na and better than 100T and sentinels
Why didn’t they even take a map in gf
It’s clear that they need to work on only one thing and that is to comeback when ur down
And I’m pretty sure they are improving Rn as there is a huge break before champions
I expect envy to be really good at champions
If envy are best in na and better than 100T and sentinels. Why didn’t they even take a map in gf
because gambit is the better team, and they were stylistically compatible against them?
What is this non-sequitur lol, what does being the best team in NA have to do with beating the best team in EMEA...?
Your logic is so faulty
the problem with this site is that people that have no clue what they're talking about are convinced that they do
it's my fault i really shouldn't have typed in the first place. it's like talking to a brick wall sometimes. i don't use any "big words" you're just dumb as a rock dude.
gonna stop myself from typing any more, hf replying
VLR gotta be the most degenerate site on the whole internet. These dudes are attacking a dumb take, with the dumbest attack i have ever seen. MFs said you can't count the old roster as if 100T didnt make a huge change recently LOL. MFs said if you beat them head to head you're better but won't say 100T is better than Gambit. MFs actually just being the biggest hypocrites but I applaud you for reminding me why we shouldn't read these comments.
you can have whatever opinion you want, you can think ge is the best team in the world and that's fine
but if you're not going to properly defend it of course i'll make a comment lmao
instead just saying "hot take: blah blah blah" and then failing to provide any evidence is just a waste of everyones time
if you have a take with no backing to it you're literally just spewing shit out of your mouth for no reason, obviously people will call you out on it
hot take: sentinels are actually the worst team in na
hot take: havan liberty is better than gambit
hot take: india deserves 16 spots at champions
hot take: japan is the strongest region
nice man
KRU would be top-12 in EMEA at best, these guys are good but still were rolled by Envy / G2.
Nuturn... Lost to Full Sense 13-3 13-0... Do I have to say something else?
Sentinels low competition abusers, won 1 tournament when nobody had any clue how to play Valorant and you put them above VS and Envy, I wanna see what they can do at Champions but I don't think they will succeed...
Sentinels are big fluke, you saw that in Berlin and you gonna see it in Champions too…they dont have a coach, they were better in Iceland than the other teams cause back than there werent good strategies in the game, so they just won it with aim cause they had shazham and tenz in the team, sick is good too but they not gonna do much without a coach and with these same strategies all the time.
Champions winner is gonna be Gambit or Liquid imo, but VS, Acend,Envy,G2 can put up a good fight too.