koi better or heretics better
Heard you loud and clear ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฟ
The best team became the best not with your region Coach lil bro what are you talking about ๐คฃ
Im bringing the 0 team region coach to make your best team a 0 team region!!!! Goober!!!
When you speak speak fax my region got the most trophyโs this year what are you talking about ๐๐
Koi should be better how so? You talk about how the roster need time then you say short term should better.
Well idk where you have read I said they need time, but yes they need time. How does that make sense? Well, because TH needs even more time.
A team with 4 players full of tier 1 experience should be better short term than a team of 4 rookies, as simple as that
What do you mean? you clearly say in a post that because the IGL is new need they more time. But you say now that short term this team should better that's why i don't understand.
I said that this being the first ever game IGLing, as a team, an off season tournament, agent bans and bo5 it was about to be a shitshow
Again my point is, they do need time, quite a few actually, just not as much as TH should need
But you're generalising the statement. Both teams might need more time but koi probably needs less time because they have three original players but a new igl, while TH has 4 relatively young and an old igl. Hence why koi should be better but I highly doubt that koi will do well again next year.
na tier 2 is considered much deeper than eu tier 2, especially since there are less tier 1 na orgs
is considered cos they are just clouted more. just because you know them more it doesnt make them good too.