pancc and NTK (BR come)

#1

Subreezy

it’s all good to joke about what these two have done, but don’t be weird and be xenophobic and racist toward the brazilian users here. most brazilians disagree with what they’ve done. make fun of the individual, not the region

#2

Manaphy

1

Frags

+

–

Thanks for calming me down. I was going on a rampage!

#5

rjsperm

0

Frags

+

–

bad boy.

#3

rjsperm

6

Frags

+

–

Wubreezy
but fr you people are delusional if you’re hating on all brazilians because of what those 2 did

#4

Kiko

11

Frags

+

–

AS LONG AS THEY DONT SUPPORT THE UNION I SUPPORT THEM!

#10

Subreezy

0

Frags

+

–

that’s fair

i think the other 3 should be picked up by mibr and furia next year though

#6

4rrowlol

-3

Frags

+

–

No I will 100% make fun of the region for having the age of consent at 14, allowing pancc to walk away scot free, as well as only giving ntk a 400 dollar fine and 6m jail time for beating the shit out of a woman.

It’s actually insane how riot shadow bans sinatraa (not condoning what he did) for simply being accused but ignores convicted criminals playing their game competitively, double standards are insane.

Also for those who are inevitably gonna come and say “what about Japan”, Japan prefectural law takes precedence over national law, and almost all prefectures have it at 18

#7

Kiko

2

Frags

+

–

and sinatraa wasnt even proven guilty (or innocent)

#8

Subreezy

12

Frags

+

–

you think every brazilian agrees with the laws of the country? do you agree with every law in the US and believe they’re a fair representation of every individual in the nation?

blame the lawmakers, not the average citizen.

#11

4rrowlol

4

Frags

+

–

The amount of Brazilians I’ve seen on this site saying “ntk did the time” is fucking astounding, anyone that supports the union needs to be put to shame

#13

Subreezy

0

Frags

+

–

it is fair to say that ntk did the time based on his country’s laws, but i don’t think that’s justification to say riot has no reason to remove him from franchising if the union makes it.

ultimately riot is a private company with no real valorant unions so they can deny whoever they want though. if they view ntk as a brand risk, they can force the team to remove him

(allat) ntk did do the time technically, but riot has every right to deny him a spot in the league

#14

alice_

0

Frags

+

–

a few days ago saw a br thread that had more info about ntk. iirc it said that after he got out of prison he had therapy and now has a normal relationship.
im not trying to say hes a saint or that i feel good about him but if thats true i think we should at least recognize that he might have improved his behaviour

and idk about pancc

#16

Subreezy

-1

Frags

+

–

pancc put out a twitlonger admitting his guilt and the only backlash that happened was him being dropped from his cs roster for 2 months, then they added him back

#9

alice_

0

Frags

+

–

i agree that all of that is fucked up but the citizens dont make the laws

#12

zombzino

0

Frags

+

–

thats my coach!

#15

Martinao

0

Frags

+

–

It’s their life, they can do whatever they want and live with the consequences

#17

srxz_

3

Frags

+

–

This team is a disgrace, Riot Brasil allow them to play with two convicted players is a disgrace as well, there's a term in Brazil that we call "passar pano" aka Whitewash that's what Riot does, even a Brazilian Riot caster is married with a player from the Union and she said that players committed "errors", Brazilian chat during the games are full of people cheering against and making comments towards the abusers but the msgs are always deleted by the Riot mod team.
I will never support a team with those two.

#18

DELUSIONAL_POTTER_FAN

0

Frags

+

–

support fame 🤤🤤🤤

#19

Zeron

0

Frags

+

–

i love br woman