Guys, stop with the threads of "Liquid deserve more the masters spot than G2 because they just beat oxg and giants" When you say that, do u realise that liquid just beat oxg and forze?
Forze its even worst than giants and, for more fun, liquid lost to navi!!!!!
They had a shit tournament and dont deserve to be in masters for their performance.
G2 deserve more in terms of performance (Their performance were bad, but not that bad as liquid), stop being delusional.
While they were a disappointment, top 4 isn't that bad and they showed what they could do when they weren't being inconsistent. But I do agree they def could have played better and in some games, they didn't look like themselves at all. Plus the lan experience from Iceland could have improved their performance in Berlin,
Are we forgetting that Liquid was like 4 seconds away from beating Gambit, the EMEA #1 Seed?
I think the point is that G2 struggled against Giants(a relatively easy opponent) to qualify, while Liquid had to, and almost did, beat a much better team.
I see where the Liquid fans are coming from but TL is very inconsistent and I think the 4 representatives from EMEA all deserve their slots.
g2 were less than a millisecond from beating gambit and did better against them overall compared to liquid
liquid lost 13-5 and 13-5 against giants in a more important match at that time
also 13-4 and 13-3 map wins for g2 against giants isnt struggling
sorry for this random nerd post i am g2 fanboy
liquid won against giants in a seeding match(grand finals) but they did good against them but still not better than g2
g2 didnt do well against giants on icebox tho
sorry for this reply idk why i sent it even though you typed all 4 representatives deserve their slots
prolly cuz im g2 fanboy
also i think in g2 v liquid match both teams are equal and it can go either way
Yeah, an upper bracket playoffs qualifier match is definitely more important match than a lower bracket Berlin qualifier. Got it.
By your logic, G2 almost dropped a map to OXG while TL stomped them. Does that make TL a better team?No
If Team A defeats team B by a greater margin than another Team C doesn’t make Team A better than Team C
i understand why someone would think g2 is more deserving and i also understand why someone would think TL was more deserving. i don’t think it’s right to call TL fans delusional no matter what you think because they had a very close series with Gambit and if one round went differently they’d be in berlin
Thats the same for G2, if the plant come just a few miliseconds later, then gambit wont be emea champions, but doesnt matter "if this, if that" G2 won the games that they need and liquid no.
My point is that, in terms of performance G2 is more deserving, and all the arguments that fanboys (not fans) use to say that their team deserve more the spot can be used against them as i said, also saying who deserve more wont change nothing.
https://www.vlr.gg/35979/are-liquid-more-deserving-of-masters-than-g2
https://www.vlr.gg/33895/g2-and-team-liquid
https://www.vlr.gg/33759/i-feel-sad-for-team-liquid
On all this threads u have a lot of posts saying that liquid deserve more than G2 having shit arguments that can be used against them.
Discord