i see all the emea and eu people saying NA only has Sentinels blah blah blah. NV and 100T are pretty close to SEN maybe NV more then 100T BUT they are both really good teams. just as good maybe better than gambit ace and G2.
First how can you say NV more than 100T when 100T beat NV thus would make them closer to the top? would it not
Second they are not pretty close SEN has proven since stage 2 that they are the best and by a very long way
Third if you are saying that 100T and NV are better than gambit ace and G2 that would mean that they are better than SMB using your logic thus proving again your logic is flawed
Fourth EMEA ftw
This was said about Iceland too. Eventually it will be correct, but saying it before every LAN is just dumb when we have no real way to compare the teams since Iceland. Of course the odds aren't in SENS favour to repeat, there's like 8 teams that realistically have a chance to go on a run and win it all. But pretending you are some expert that is seeing something in the game most people are is silly.