"sage on icebox"
now he gets 6 kills in a half(didnt get a kill till r8) on KAYO.
whats excuse now.
if he didnt have 400k twitter followers this bot would be replaced long ago.
Me personally as a viewer I don't go too deep into thinking about shit like that. We're not in the game. No way for us to know the value he really adds to the team even if we can't see the impact. I'd just trust the team to make those decisions on their own and let them come instead of bickering about individual performances.
TLDR They're a team, it only takes one round to get momentum/come online.
You're misunderstanding. Not speaking for him, but I'm sure he means that 100T game plan relies more on Asuna using Kayo as support for the team, rather than investing the utility in himself so much.
All I'm saying is there's at least 6 other people's opinion (4 teammates/ coaching staff) who are more than capable of making roster decisions. No need to give your negative one.
saadhak mvping with sage https://i.imgur.com/ecq3SjK.png
pancada mvping with sage https://i.imgur.com/lppgku1.png
playing sage isnt excuse to be bad
When are we gonna stop acting like Valorant games are so cookie cutter. Every team plays to different strategies. Sometimes you just don't get the same scenarios/setups that allowed those performances.
Not taking away from Saadhak and Pancada they successfully reacted and excuted. Just pointing out those are different players, meta, matches, etc.
So many things go into the outcome of Valorant rounds it's not just a simple equation.