1

NA>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Emea

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
ibop_

I feel that at this pace we should consider giving NA teams more opportunities to showcase the potential that Tier 2 teams have at an international level, NA Ascension league is more entertaining to watch compared to bad Emea or Apac T2 tourneys where all the competition is already franchised, while NA has T2 teams that could easily keep up or even dominate T1 Apac/Emea teams 😴 Certain Emea franchised teams don’t deserve to be playing with C9, EG, or NRG 🥱

#2
goldy_OP
0
Frags
+

What does NA and Emea stands for ?

#4
ambo69
-3
Frags
+

north america and europe

#6
HockeyStick
0
Frags
+

Europe and mena btw kekw

#10
xD1LL4N
-4
Frags
+

Smartest American.

#12
ambo69
18
Frags
+

EMEA stand for "Europe, Middle East and North Africa" but since only Europe has any representation, it is colloquially used to describe the European scene

Happy, asshole?

#14
blueberry
6
Frags
+

Own that fraud

#16
xD1LL4N
-9
Frags
+

Im a Happy asshole. yes

#21
sexyman
-3
Frags
+

Commas save lives.

#27
BroStop
0
Frags
+

bro from EU and doesn't understand his own Region LMAO

#3
sexyman
2
Frags
+

Hey wait I have seen this one before...

#5
hanafuji
-4
Frags
+

NA >>>> EMEA >>>>> DRX >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> REST OF PACIFIC

#24
HockeyStick
0
Frags
+

Change

#7
juno_VLR
3
Frags
+

5 NA teams is honestly enough, especially compared to CS where there’s Liquid and occasionally Complexity.

#20
Gqviria
0
Frags
+

This isnt CS tho, Valorant is as big if not bigger than other regions

#22
cocoluna
0
Frags
+

Hallzerk- imma need me them Awps every damn round

#8
Wronghand
7
Frags
+

Top 4 EMEA teams in other side of bracket.

Put them on this side and it'd be super close matches.

Lets just wait until we see the real EMEA play before we say anything.

But yes, they'd function the same with 6 slots as they would with 10.

#13
LouBag
0
Frags
+

This is true.

I have 100% picks but I have EMEA winning most of the matchups in the next bracket.

#19
Wronghand
0
Frags
+

My bracket delusional as fuck, but I got LEV over Navi because FUCK IT WE BALL.

Maybe Sen, Lev, or 100T can take out an EMEA team but we'll see.

#9
Subreezy
0
Frags
+

T2 Americas EMEA and Pacific tourney would be so funny though

#15
ibop_
0
Frags
+

maybe bottom 5 of ascension team vs top 5 of each emea/apac ascension teams, DSG, The Guard, and M80 are T1 caliber tbh

#18
Subreezy
0
Frags
+

agreed, NA challengers is crazy this year
i still call them T2 cause they're in challengers even though their skill level is higher than some franchised teams

#11
Ivan_
3
Frags
+

.

#17
Ivan_
3
Frags
+

Americas top 5 <= EMEA top 3
Americas bottom 5 > EMEA bottom 7. Also Russian players solo

#23
yungbasel
0
Frags
+

Oofh, honestly at this point, NA >>> EMEA shouldn't be a hottake.

The best EMEA teams are carried by CIS players really. How it got like this so quickly after 2021? I do not know.

Fnatic are perrenial chokers, and I do not think that SEN game is free for them at all, though I'd like to see them get a win and play to level we know that squad is capable of.

NAVI and Liquid both solid, but will likely end up knocking each other out.

#25
frakeN
0
Frags
+

We still didn't see NaVi TL FNC

KOI TH BBL were really bad tho

Giants-NRG is important

#26
unknown_trash
0
Frags
+

NA may be better overall, but the top of EMEA are extremely good. The reason why EMEA and pacific look so bad is because it is only now that we are seeing the divide between the best of the best in EMEA compared to those just below them. I won't say that EMEA is a one team region, but theres definitely only like 25 players in EMEA that are good enough to compete on the world stage and they have been divided into 10 different teams. That might explain why so many of the EMEA teams look so bad, whereas in americas, while there might also only be like 35 top players in the world at most, only 25 of them (more like 23) actually get to play in franchising, so the talent is less spread out. Also, brazil and latam have some good teams because all the best players have been put into 2 or 3 teams. So it makes more sense that NA (and Americas league) will be better and NA ascension will also be better too. Finally, the reason why pacific league is so bad (or mediocre) is because japan was a one team region, korea was a one team region, and SEA was only really dominated by PRX and XIA. Therefore, Americas will be the strongest and most entertaining league for a while.

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment