Stop Fighting on BO1

#1

OnlyOneStar

We know BO1 are not as accurate as BO3 also that doesn't mean you take away credit from BO1 winners

#2

SnooTangerines

3

Frags

+

–

ok

#3

horse69

-10

Frags

+

–

https://www.vlr.gg/157700/global-esports-vs-bleed-valorant-india-invitational-by-galaxy-racer-d2
ADR/HS/ACS/KAST
GE: 128/ 27.8%/186.8/71.4 %
BLD: 128.6/26.2%/197.4/67.8%
https://www.vlr.gg/157693/paper-rex-vs-global-esports-valorant-india-invitational-by-galaxy-racer-d1
GE: 128.8/29.6/193.6/62%
PRX: 158.8/ 28.2/226.4/77%
The stats against bleed show that they were close, meaning bleed could’ve won if small things changed. But stats against prx show they got absolutely dominated. I would call this a BO1 fluke.

#4

33AJ

13

Frags

+

–

No sane indian would say ge>bleed or ge >prx
But ge>boom end of discussion

#6

horse69

0

Frags

+

–

I agree with ge > current boom

#8

FlyingDoggoWoweeCIap7

-3

Frags

+

–

GE > current BOOM
Old Boom > GE

but i hope current BOOM can figure the problem out man

#5

SnooTangerines

7

Frags

+

–

Man literally copied stats and think he is Einstein or something.

bleed could’ve won if small things changed.

Except they didn't, the same was true for so many earlier SA games like EG vs Mith or VLT vs FS. What matters is experience VLT and EG did not have the experience of closing games in which they have the lead. That's it. A win is a win a loss is a loss. Take it how you will take it. Upsets do happen. If we talk about "if X team changed small little things against team Y" for every single game then PRX would have won masters 2, DRX would be world champions by now and both EG and VLT would be in APAC playoffs doing pretty well. Xerxia would beat Liquid, Team Secret could have beaten Gambit.

But stats against prx show they got absolutely dominated

Jingg got diffed by Kappa in that match btw. Care about mentioning that? Does that mean Kappa > Jingg now?

If you think stats tell the entire story you are one of the dumbest guy over here.

#9

horse69

-4

Frags

+

–

I guess if you think Jingg got diffed by Kappa
Jingg diffed HellrangeR, Skrossi
Benkai diffed Skillz, HellrangeR, Kappa, SKrossi, but got diffed by Lightningfast
mindfreak diffed Kappa, SKrossi, Lightningfast, but got diffed by Skillz
D4v41 diffed Kappa, but got diffed by SKrossi, Lightningfast
f0rsakeN diffed Skillz, Kappa, Lightningfast, but got diffed by SKrossi
in that game
also i dont think stats tell the entire story but that is my evidence of how prx was way better in terms of those ways of counting value of players in valorant, while ge wasn't dominant against their match against bleed

#11

SnooTangerines

7

Frags

+

–

Care to tell me what is your definition of domination? A lot of the rounds in PRX vs GE came down to 1v1 or 1v2s with a 50/50 chance of winning for either team. PRX won the better share of those.

The scoreboard ofc had top PRX members on top but GE members were not very far behind with comparable frags.

There were highlight frags from both teams.

The scoreline was not 13-4 or 13-1 or something. It was an okayish 13-7. Which lies in the middle (not domination, not close).

None of this means it was a domination, care explaining why was it a domination or you just said it cause you are another one of those dumb baiters on this site with an IQ lower than the number of frags Kappa got.

If you think
GE: 128.8/29.6/193.6/62%
PRX: 158.8/ 28.2/226.4/77%

if a huge gap of stats how about you look into games which appeared much closer to you? The stats are usually far apart. Look at PRX vs BOOM for instance which you can call domination. PRX vs GE stats are really close as well.

#16

horse69

-2

Frags

+

–

13-7 is almost a double score, which i think is domination. For it not to be a domination, i say it should be 13-9 or more. both ADR and ACS diff by 30, which is also a large number

#21

SnooTangerines

1

Frags

+

–

Do you even know how ACS is calculated or are you a born idiot?

Literally, 30 extra dmg will give you 30 ACS. This means literally shooting 1 extra phantom bullet will give you 30 extra ACS.

A multi kill bonus gives you extra 20 ACS, an extra flash or smoke assist gives you 25 ACS.

If all that means is that GE vs PRX was even close than what the scoreline says. Ofc horse "Einstein" 69 thinks just copying stats makes him a genius.

#32

horse69

-2

Frags

+

–

Literally, 30 extra dmg will give you 30 ACS. This means literally shooting 1 extra phantom bullet will give you 30 extra ACS.

A multi kill bonus gives you extra 20 ACS, an extra flash or smoke assist gives you 25 ACS.

in every single round

#17

horse69

-2

Frags

+

–

dumb baiters on this site with an IQ lower than the number of frags Kappa got

Well GE beat Bleed so GE owns every single EMEA team now.

SkRossi the 🐐🐐 owns the following:

APAC
EMEA
NA
Entirety of VCT
You
Your Mom
Your grandma

#19

SnooTangerines

2

Frags

+

–

I think you do not understand what sarcasm is. Also going through my profile just shows how desperate you really are.

Mind sharing the context with other people? Just to further prove just how big of a clown you really are.

#20

horse69

-1

Frags

+

–

what you say: sarcasm
what others say: bait
+
I looked clicked your profile since you had four stars and complained about baiters on this site, and found you have almost 2000 posts. there aren't 2000 things to talk about on this site unless they are stupid baits. So I looked though around 10 of ur posts and thats what came up

#22

SnooTangerines

2

Frags

+

–

I eat low IQ ppl like you for breakfast. Unfortunately there are too many like you on this website and that explains the 2000 posts.

#24

horse69

0

Frags

+

–

I bet i am smarter than you

#25

SnooTangerines

4

Frags

+

–

XD you are from Australia mate. One of the smarter 10th-grade kids in India could probably graduate from your universities with a top grade.

continue thread →

#12

SpaceFam

-1

Frags

+

–

bro only saw the kappA>Jinngggg

#10

horse69

-1

Frags

+

–

i never said would've but i said could've lmao learn english diction

#14

SnooTangerines

4

Frags

+

–

The stats against bleed show that they were close, meaning bleed could’ve won if small things changed.

The stats against bleed show that they were close, meaning bleed would’ve won if small things changed.

Care to explain how that brings a difference in your intentions? You still mean BLEED did not play bad, you are trying to steal credits from a team who actually won while being a hypocrite and ignoring the fact that the same was true for earlier SA games as well.

Its just funny how idiots like you just cannot see somebody else win and will dig up excuses from the depths of the earth just to steal credits for a win.

#15

horse69

-1

Frags

+

–

I never said GE didn't deserve win or smth. I said that GE winning a BO1 against BLD isn't something to go crazy on, especially since it was a close game. Therefore i said could've suggesting possibility, not would've which has more definite diction

#18

SnooTangerines

1

Frags

+

–

Then what even your point idiot? How about you stick to your claims and own something for once?

Ofc everybody knows Bo1 is not something to claim that GE is the best team there is RN. There are only a couple of ppl claiming that and we all know how delusional they are.

Bleed is a top-ascension team. Beating them IS SOMETHING TO GO CRAZY OVER especially when GE was expected to go 0-3 in the groups and 13-0 or 13-1 against PRX. Instead, they had a decent game against PRX, beat Bleed and had a very good performance against BOOM.
GE over-delivered and that is what is keeping people talking.

Unfortunately, you are just one of those self-loathing people that try to comb in with people from other regions. Don't worry there are plenty of people like you in India as well and we know how big of clowns they are.

#23

horse69

-1

Frags

+

–

Ofc everybody knows Bo1 is not something to claim that GE is the best team there is RN. There are only a couple of ppl claiming that and we all know how delusional they are.

Not everyone does? go back to the previous post on
https://www.vlr.gg/158439/ex-ge-playstyle
and you'll se dozens of people on just that thread. again, i never said ge is generally a bad team, i said that bleed and prx matches aren't something to hype since the are BO1 and thats where my first post came from

#7

Melloaw

10

Frags

+

–

Yea that’s the good thing about bo1 is it is very unpredictable, lots of surprises smaller teams have more chance to win. I like it. A win is still a win doesn’t matter if it’s bo1 or bo3.

#13

SpaceFam

1

Frags

+

–

Rare Mellaow W

#28

horse69

0

Frags

+

–

.