Was masters 2 a fluke run?

Master 1 - people called Optic’s win a fluke run due to EMEA teams not at their full level. Loud also made it to second place. HOWEVER, their performance in Masters 2 were subpar with Loud dropping out and Optic earning a subpar rank

Masters 2- same shit with PRX and FPX. Made it to grand finals and choke on champions

chose on champions? what are you even smoking brah

These top 2 teams were the best at the time. Every tournament run ever seen in international valorant events has been called a fluke. That just doesn’t add up, they were the best teams at the time, then teams evolve, and people adapt to their play style, it’s how the cookie crumbles

Isn't every valorant international lan a fluke run...except for optic they have been consistently at the top

Tf you mean Optic got a subpar placement at Copenhagen, they got 3rd…

they still have a lower bracket and they lost to an actual good team.

if you look at fpx run closely at m2, you see they beat 1st seed jp, kr, apac, fellow emea teams, and optic. i dont think that's fluke.
prx and fpx are the most studied teams in this tourny, too.

Optic is a fluke run, you can't convince me otherwise (except they win this tournament). they are 3rd, 4th, or at best 2nd place
FPX is not a fluke run

honey wake up someone else is making a thread calling a good team a fluke

Choke ? Little bro , fpx are still alive and they won Copenhagen via lower bracket run . Don't forget that .