3

would FPX 2 peated?

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
tuxmko

stage 1 FPX was better than this version of FPX, even tho I'm a APAC fan you guys think they would of won stage 1 if there was no IRL world fiasco? and maybe stage 2 depending on how prx approaches this

#2
SigmaMale
1
Frags
+

Im pretty sure they wouldve made top 3

#3
tuxmko
4
Frags
+

yes without a doubt

#4
Olofboost
3
Frags
+

It wasn't better than this
This is the peakest of peak FPXs we've ever seen

They still would've won M1 tho, just less convincingly

#11
tuxmko
0
Frags
+

they beat fnatic and g2 that challengers, and im pretty sure fnatic got their energy sucked from that levi vs fnatic game so that's why i thought FPX m1 was better than this one, also i thought shao was way better challengers 1 statistically
Edit: but ur the fan of fpx so u know more but plz enlighten me, cause i love the other regions development

#5
worstbrimplayer
-2
Frags
+

Nah they wouldn’t have

#6
blueberry
1
Frags
+

didnt fpx roll through challengers in stage one? i think they would definitely get to gf if all 5 were there

#7
Snakee--
0
Frags
+

They would. Optic just cant win vs EU.
They are too bad.

#8
w0v
1
Frags
+

Based take

#9
patuj
1
Frags
+

IMO they would have been one of the favorites. They were arguably best EMEA team for Masters 1 meta. They knew how to play fast and aggressive unlike G2 lol

#10
archetype
3
Frags
+

Masters 1 they could've won/top 3 min. But Idk if this would've carried over for Masters 2 because the winner of these tournaments gets counterstratted really hard

#12
Wylie
2
Frags
+

the only correct take

#13
tuxmko
1
Frags
+

good take

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment