would FPX 2 peated?

stage 1 FPX was better than this version of FPX, even tho I'm a APAC fan you guys think they would of won stage 1 if there was no IRL world fiasco? and maybe stage 2 depending on how prx approaches this

Im pretty sure they wouldve made top 3

SigmaMale [#2]

Im pretty sure they wouldve made top 3

yes without a doubt

It wasn't better than this
This is the peakest of peak FPXs we've ever seen

They still would've won M1 tho, just less convincingly

Nah they wouldn’t have

didnt fpx roll through challengers in stage one? i think they would definitely get to gf if all 5 were there

They would. Optic just cant win vs EU.
They are too bad.

Snakee-- [#7]

They would. Optic just cant win vs EU.
They are too bad.

Based take

IMO they would have been one of the favorites. They were arguably best EMEA team for Masters 1 meta. They knew how to play fast and aggressive unlike G2 lol

Masters 1 they could've won/top 3 min. But Idk if this would've carried over for Masters 2 because the winner of these tournaments gets counterstratted really hard

Olofboost [#4]

It wasn't better than this
This is the peakest of peak FPXs we've ever seen

They still would've won M1 tho, just less convincingly

they beat fnatic and g2 that challengers, and im pretty sure fnatic got their energy sucked from that levi vs fnatic game so that's why i thought FPX m1 was better than this one, also i thought shao was way better challengers 1 statistically
Edit: but ur the fan of fpx so u know more but plz enlighten me, cause i love the other regions development

archetype [#10]

Masters 1 they could've won/top 3 min. But Idk if this would've carried over for Masters 2 because the winner of these tournaments gets counterstratted really hard

the only correct take

archetype [#10]

Masters 1 they could've won/top 3 min. But Idk if this would've carried over for Masters 2 because the winner of these tournaments gets counterstratted really hard

good take