Bro how are people clowning EMEA when they have 2 teams in top 4? braindead...
because anything outside of domination is an underperformance for EMEA due to such high expectations
u dont remember NA fans everywhere, reddit, twitetr etc when optic won reykjavik? when sentinels was dominating ?
Strange
they have 3 slots, not making a high placement is an embarrassement when you have the most slots
i mean theres an argument to be made about depth. 3rd seeds emea actually does something unlike other regions 2nd seeds. only time they didnt was when fnatic had 2 subs.
Idrk NA got 3 seeds in berlin and both 2 & 3 did better than 1st. 100T and nv got third and second no?
I don't like doing this but when it comes down to a head to head G2 lost to gambit while 100T won against them even though it was in the group stage. Therefore, there's an argument to be made for saying that 100T got third in m3 Berlin. However, no one can say for sure because they didn't play for third and it doesn't matter because they got the same amount of prize money for making it to the semis.
NA fans talk like if our 3rd seed didn’t beat OPTC. They can say fluke or whatever which I believe is partially true but it’s already more than what XSET has done
3 slots but then they put one of teams in a group with loud, optic and even if they get out they still have to play against emea teams
I think the region gets called shit because when they play qualifiers within the region the matches are very slow and tactical. To the general watcher it's boring so they just dismiss it
The region shows how good it is when the tactical game has to adapt on the world stage to the firepower of other regions.